In the gently undulating semi-desert, 10 minutes' drive from the dusty northern Jordanian town of Mafraq and the old single-track Hejaz Railway that Lawrence of Arabia targeted 85 years ago, lies the sprawling campus of an international university which forms part of Jordan's strategy to counter extremist Islam.
In a part of the world often associated in the West with bigoted fundamentalism, Aal al-Bait University has a "special mission," says its president, Salman al-Badur: "To teach students academic subjects; and to create Islamic moderation, Islamic tolerance."
Established in 1993, the university was part of Jordan's answer to the rising regional tide of Islamic fundamentalism.
"When King Hussein dedicated this university, he stated this very clearly," al-Badur said. "We are here to teach tolerance. We're not limited to one point of view -- the Sunni, or the Shia, the Zaidi or the Alawi.
We teach all Islamic traditions."
He explained: "Every student, even those studying subjects such as computer science, physics and chemistry, has to be acquainted with the problems facing the Islamic world, with the differences between Muslims themselves. Every student has to study comparative religion."
Aal al-Bait -- which roughly translates as "family of the Prophet" -- now has some 7,000 students and 300 teaching staff. Most of the students are Jordanian but a significant number are foreign.
"We have students from Malaysia, Iran, Indonesia, Brunei, the US, Russia, Herzegovina, Ghana and Senegal," said al-Badur, a philosopher who has studied and taught at universities as diverse as Damascus, Tehran, Princeton and Harvard.
As in all eight of Jordan's public universities, academic standards at Aal al-Bait are high and competition for places is fierce. The university's preoccupation with Islam does not mean that the students are all Muslims. Echoing the religious structure of the kingdom's 5 million people, they include some Christians.
Islamism is nothing new in Jordan. The country's first King, Abdullah, encouraged conservative Islamic sentiment as a means of staving off the demands for greater democracy of secular-minded Arab nationalists. His successor, King Hussain, while paying necessary lip-service to nationalism, took a similar line. After the catastrophic Arab defeat in the 1967 war with Israel, however, nationalism declined and Islamism became the region's most dynamic political force, threatening the existing order, including the conservative, Western-backed monarchies like Jordan's that had survived nationalist hegemony.
In Syria and Iraq and other states, Islamism was held in check by sweeping and cruel repression. King Hussain took another, arguably more intelligent, road, seeking to tame the Islamists by making them an integral part of the system as the "loyal opposition."
In 1989, Jordan held its first free and fair general election for three decades. The Islamic Action Front (IAF) -- essentially the political wing of the main Islamist movement, the Ikhwan al-Muslimoun or Muslim Brotherhood -- won 22 parliamentary seats, a quarter of the total.
This was a bit more than the regime had anticipated. For the 1993 elections the voting rules were changed in a way that would work against the IAF, whose seats declined to 19. Angered, the IAF boycotted the 1997 elections. The 2000 election was delayed until June this year, when the IAF returned 17 members to parliament, including one woman. In addition, the IAF could count on the support of five or six independent Islamists.
Although far from forming a parliamentary majority, the IAF is the only organized party in Jordan's parliament. All the other members of parliament (MPs) represent tribes, clans or regions.
"In this parliament there are no real political movements except the IAF," said Deputy Speaker Ali Abu al-Sukkar.
His view was endorsed by a well-placed Western diplomat: "The IAF is the only coherent party."
To avoid alienating Islamic sentiment, the monarchy has emphasized its religious credentials, including the royal family's descent from the Prophet Muhammad. It has encouraged moderation by giving Islamists a stake in the system (albeit that Jordan's parliament in practice has only limited powers) and by such steps as establishing Aal al-Bait University.
At the same time, it has used more direct methods to neutralise Islamists (and others) deemed to be beyond the political pale, justifying this to Western audiences since Sept. 11 as part of the "war on terrorism." The kingdom's key internal security agency, the General Intelligence Directorate (GID), stands accused of harassing, detaining and maltreating dissidents. It's a far cry from the brutalities of outright police states but the GID's excesses fit awkwardly with Jordan's carefully cultivated image as an oasis of tolerance and decency in a regional desert of political oppression.
"In all Third World countries, it's the mukhabarat [secret police] who exert control and we are one of those countries," said Abdul Majid Thnaibat, superindendent-general of the Muslim Brotherhood, although he conceded that Jordan was nevertheless "better than any other Arab country."
Elsewhere in the region, he explained, "the president is the head of a party, not the head of state. Here, the king is for everybody."
Asked early this year whether the regime's attitude towards democracy had improved in recent years, Shaikh Hamza Mansour, head of the IAF, declared: "No, it's worse."
He complained of "unceasing repression," inking this to the government's failure to resist anti-Islamic pressures from its key foreign backer, the US.
At grassroots level, Islamism remains easily the dominant political force in Jordan.
"In general, people here don't consider bin Laden's actions to be criminal, but acts of self-defense," said Abd as-Salam al-Fandi, Imam of the small Ahmad Bin Taimiyah Mosque in the village of Ba al-Jadid, 13km west of the capital, Amman.
"We [Muslims] don't attack. We just defend," he said.
He said Muslims deeply resented the West's support for Israel's dispossession of the Palestinians, its drive for hegemony and its appetite for the Islamic world's oil and other resources.
"The people hate the US for what it did and this makes them like bin Laden. An eye for an eye," he said.
Reflecting the majority view in Jordan, al-Fandi stressed: "It's not just a [conventional] fight over borders. The people believe that it's a fight to affirm the existence of Islam."
The extent to which Islamism gathers even more momentum in Jordan will depend on the West's readiness to respect regional sensibilities. The invasion of Iraq and US President George W. Bush's failure to bring peace between Israelis and Palestinians suggest that the hardline fundamentalist tide will continue to rise. Whether there will ultimately be a place for the moderation symbolized and fostered by Aal Al-Bait University remains to be seen.
Alan George is the author of Syria: Neither Bread Nor Freedom.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations