Perpetrating stereotypes
In his article, David Momphard defined "the hidden minority," as those born in Taiwan, but raised in the US, or born in the US to Taiwanese parents ("The hidden identity," March 30, page 17). He continues by repeating a common misnomer by referring to them as "American-born Chinese," or ABCs.
I find it puzzling that these overseas Taiwanese are so often called ABCs. Shouldn't they more aptly be called American-born Taiwanese or ABTs? It is a simple label that clearly denotes one's country of origin.
Many Taiwanese or overseas Taiwanese still use the terms "Chinese" and "Taiwanese "interchangeably because of the confusion between national and ethnic identity. Or perhaps the lines have been blurred by mixed marriages.
As someone born in the US to Taiwanese parents, I proudly identify myself as a Taiwanese American, not a Chinese American. My parents were not raised in China, nor do they reside in China.
Momphard's depiction of "the hidden minority" in Taiwan proliferates the stereotypes of Taiwanese-born and raised overseas as spoiled, rich kids. It is unfair to categorize a group along narrow characteristics. There are many deeply personal reasons that ABTs have chosen to return to Taiwan -- which Momphard alludes to, but does not delve into.
Though Momphard didn't report on any major discrimination experienced by the hidden minority, there is discrimination, in subtle forms -- when one is chided for speaking Mandarin Chinese or Hokkien with a funny accent or constantly questioned as to why can't they speak Chinese as flawlessly as any native Taiwanese person. Discrimination occurs when members of the hidden minority, who are native English speakers in their own right, are paid less per hour for teaching English than other visually obvious foreigners.
Discrimination occurs when Taiwanese employers refuse to apply for work permits for the hidden minority; employers expect ABTs to have an ROC ID which entitles them to work in Taiwan, but other foreign-educated English speakers would most likely not meet such resistance from potential employers.
Certainly ABTs might be able to score the top jobs due to their foreign education and strong grasp of Chinese language skills, but their experiences are not without hidden discrimination.
Felicia Lin
Kaohsiung
Roy off-base about India
The opinion piece by Arundhati Roy is without any basis nor with any proof ("The resistable rise of Hindu fascism," April 8, page 9). India is a secular country and will remain so due to its culture of inheritance. Indian democracy is fair and vibrant. With advances in technology, the democracy in India is becoming fairer. How Roy concludes that democracy in India is unfair is beyond me.
Roy brings her communist ideology into her article, complaining about any form of institution that has power, as long as it is not communist.
Gautam Desai
Fremont, California
Arundhati Roy is well-known ideologue at the same time both sympathetic to terrorists and communists, and against Indian nationalists. Her opinion piece smacks of opinion, while presenting itself as fact.
Neither is India going towards fascism, nor do India's Hindu nationalists praise Adolph Hitler. Promotion of such fear serves to only further divisions within India, and give an improper picture to those looking at India from the outside.
India is a secular, democratic country where close to 1 billion people live in relative peace -- including over 800 million Hindus, 130 million Muslims, and tens of millions of Christians, Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists. Except for the state of Jammu and Kashmir, where Pakistan-supported Islamic terrorists have killed over 60,000 people, India remains mostly peaceful.
Today's so-called Hindu nationalists do seek to organize Hindus. There are several reasons for this: the Islamic attack against India is against India as a Hindu majority state, and the evangelical onslaught is to convert over 800 million Hindus to a fundamentalist school of Christianity. Also, Marxist ideologues like Roy draw fire from Hindus as they seek to claim that what is bad in India is because of India's 5,000 year-old traditions, called Hinduism, and what is good is that which does not come from Hinduism.
While there is great change occurring in India's social and political climate, India's commitment to pluralism, diversity, democracy and freedom still stands. India's so-called Hindu nationalist party, the BJP, elected a Muslim as president. The election commissioner is Christian. Supreme Court justices, chief ministers, governors and government secretaries continue to represent all religions.
The reality of India is quite different, and much more positive than Roy sees it.
Mihir Meghani
Fremont, California
Miles missed the boat
In his zeal to criticize presidential adviser Joseph Wu (
June Teufel Dreyer
Coral Gables, Florida
Perle piece a shame
It is a big disappointment and a shame that the Taipei Times makes itself the mouthpiece for a semi-fascist warmonger like Richard Perle ("Saddam's regime falls in Baghdad; UN falls in New York. Good!" April 14, page 9). How can the Taipei Times give a platform for the cynical and smug outpourings of such a figure of dubious intentions? To let him spit on the "bleating" UN bureaucrats, those very idiots that might actually care to "fight AIDs and malaria or protect children" -- very unlike Perle indeed. Why this hurrying obedience?
Torsten Nohl
Feng Yuan
Editor's note: If Richard Perle is a "semi-fascist warmonger," he is also one who wields huge influence in Washington. Surely readers should know what Perle thinks, even if only so they may more effectively oppose him.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the
RSS