The US Federal Reserve, under intense pressure from US President Donald Trump to stimulate the economy, on Wednesday cut the benchmark interest rate for the first time in more than a decade, but struggled to justify the move or explain where it goes next.
The move to ease the cost of borrowing was well telegraphed and meant to inoculate against global risks washing onto US shores, but financial markets were whipsawed by confusion over whether another cut would be coming.
Fed Chairman Jerome Powell told reporters he remains confident in the US economy and sees no sectors ready to go “bust.”
Photo: AFP
However, he said the Fed decided on a cut of 25 basis points to “insure against downside risks from weak global growth and trade policy uncertainty, to help offset the effects these factors are having on the economy.”
However, Trump — who had been loudly calling for a rate cut — wasted no time in attacking on Twitter, saying the move fell far short of the “aggressive rate-cutting cycle” he wanted.
The target for the federal funds rate was lowered to 2.0 to 2.25 percent and the central bank again vowed to “act as appropriate to sustain the expansion.”
It was a quick turnaround for the Fed, coming after four rate increases last year — the last one in December.
However, Powell tried to paint it as part of a continuum, with central bankers shifting their policy stance as economic data changed over the course of the year, especially trade tensions, which nearly “boiled over” last month, but have now returned “to a simmer.”
US markets plunged after Powell said the Fed was not on the threshold of a “lengthy cutting cycle,” with the Dow Jones Industrial Average at one point losing nearly 500 points.
Powell later clarified, saying that neither was he ruling out another rate cut, and the Dow pared losses to close down a little more than 300 points or 1.2 percent.
“Let me be clear. I said it’s not the beginning of a long series of rate cuts. I didn’t say it’s just one or anything like that,” he said.
It was another example of the Fed’s communication woes, as it is buffeted by conflicting economic signals and constant verbal attacks.
Nor is the Fed’s policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee presenting a unified front: Esther George and Eric Rosengren, presidents of the Federal Reserve banks of Kansas City and Boston respectively, dissented in the 8-2 vote, preferring to leave rates unchanged.
The Fed also gave Trump something else he has demanded in his unrelenting attacks: an early end to a policy known as “quantitative tightening,” or QT.
Starting yesterday — two months ahead of schedule — the Fed would stop reducing the huge amount of securities it built up during the global financial crisis.
Trump’s aggressive trade policies, and his conflict with China in particular, have thrown a wrench into the world economy and complicated the Fed’s carefully laid plans.
On Wednesday, Trump welcomed the end of QT, but said: “As usual, Powell let us down.”
“What the market wanted to hear from Jay Powell and the Federal Reserve was that this was the beginning of a lengthy and aggressive rate-cutting cycle which would keep pace with China, the European Union and other countries around the world,” he tweeted.
“We are winning anyway but I am certainly not getting much,” the president added.
Powell again dismissed fears that central bankers are swayed by outside pressure on the independent Fed, saying policy is “going to depend on the evolving data and the evolving risk picture.”
“We never take into account political considerations. There’s no place in our discussions for that,” Powell added.
And despite speculation that the last rate increase was a move to defy Trump, Powell said: “We don’t conduct monetary policy in order to prove our independence.”
While the committee continues to expect sustained economic expansion and inflation gradually rising to the Fed’s 2 percent target, “uncertainties about this outlook remain,” he said.
CHIP RACE: Three years of overbroad export controls drove foreign competitors to pursue their own AI chips, and ‘cost US taxpayers billions of dollars,’ Nvidia said China has figured out the US strategy for allowing it to buy Nvidia Corp’s H200s and is rejecting the artificial intelligence (AI) chip in favor of domestically developed semiconductors, White House AI adviser David Sacks said, citing news reports. US President Donald Trump on Monday said that he would allow shipments of Nvidia’s H200 chips to China, part of an administration effort backed by Sacks to challenge Chinese tech champions such as Huawei Technologies Co (華為) by bringing US competition to their home market. On Friday, Sacks signaled that he was uncertain about whether that approach would work. “They’re rejecting our chips,” Sacks
NATIONAL SECURITY: Intel’s testing of ACM tools despite US government control ‘highlights egregious gaps in US technology protection policies,’ a former official said Chipmaker Intel Corp has tested chipmaking tools this year from a toolmaker with deep roots in China and two overseas units that were targeted by US sanctions, according to two sources with direct knowledge of the matter. Intel, which fended off calls for its CEO’s resignation from US President Donald Trump in August over his alleged ties to China, got the tools from ACM Research Inc, a Fremont, California-based producer of chipmaking equipment. Two of ACM’s units, based in Shanghai and South Korea, were among a number of firms barred last year from receiving US technology over claims they have
BARRIERS: Gudeng’s chairman said it was unlikely that the US could replicate Taiwan’s science parks in Arizona, given its strict immigration policies and cultural differences Gudeng Precision Industrial Co (家登), which supplies wafer pods to the world’s major semiconductor firms, yesterday said it is in no rush to set up production in the US due to high costs. The company supplies its customers through a warehouse in Arizona jointly operated by TSS Holdings Ltd (德鑫控股), a joint holding of Gudeng and 17 Taiwanese firms in the semiconductor supply chain, including specialty plastic compounds producer Nytex Composites Co (耐特) and automated material handling system supplier Symtek Automation Asia Co (迅得). While the company has long been exploring the feasibility of setting up production in the US to address
OPTION: Uber said it could provide higher pay for batch trips, if incentives for batching is not removed entirely, as the latter would force it to pass on the costs to consumers Uber Technologies Inc yesterday warned that proposed restrictions on batching orders and minimum wages could prompt a NT$20 delivery fee increase in Taiwan, as lower efficiency would drive up costs. Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi made the remarks yesterday during his visit to Taiwan. He is on a multileg trip to the region, which includes stops in South Korea and Japan. His visit coincided the release last month of the Ministry of Labor’s draft bill on the delivery sector, which aims to safeguard delivery workers’ rights and improve their welfare. The ministry set the minimum pay for local food delivery drivers at