Set to a rhythmic soundtrack of clacking machinery, whirring drills and inflating tires, bikes take shape at a factory run by Giant Manufacturing Co (巨大機械), which is leading the nation’s push to regain its crown as bike maker to the world.
Key to this push is demand for electric two-wheelers from environmentally conscious European consumers, with surging exports providing support during a China-US trade war.
At an assembly line near Taichung, workers for Giant — the world’s biggest bike maker — build new electric bikes that boast visibly thicker frames to house rechargeable batteries.
Photo: Sam Yeh, AFP
“This is one of the biggest driving forces for the past five years,” Giant chairwoman Bonnie Tu (杜綉珍) said, adding that e-bikes now make up one-fifth of the group’s revenue, “but I think for this year, maybe we’ll be able to reach about 30 percent.”
The global e-bike market was in 2017 valued at US$16.34 billion, but is expected to reach US$23.83 billion by 2025, according to Allied Market Research.
Taiwan’s exports of e-bikes last year jumped by more than 50 percent, with each unit costing more than US$1,300 on average, much more than standard bicycles, customs data showed.
The nation had for years been the world’s No. 1 bike producer until the 1990s, when China’s economic reforms saw firms take advantage of a vast, cheap labor force that absorbed virtually all output of the Taiwan’s bikes.
While Chinese factories continue to play a dominant role, Taiwanese production is bouncing back.
In the first quarter of this year, e-bike exports from Taiwan to Europe increased 135 percent year-on-year, while shipments to the US climbed 78 percent.
There are other increasingly compelling economic reasons to shift manufacturing away from China.
In January, the EU introduced a series of anti-dumping measures after years of complaints that e-bikes made in China were saturating the market, sold for below production costs thanks to state subsidies.
Then there are punitive tariffs the US has imposed as part of the trade dispute, which has battered many Taiwanese companies that assemble in China.
That has led to an even more pronounced surge in exports from Taiwanese factories, with firms across a range of industries increasingly willing to return home or look elsewhere for new factories.
“The shift was already kind of underway before [US President Donald] Trump was elected, or people were talking about it anyway,” said Shelley Rigger, an expert on Taiwan at Davidson College in North Carolina.
Even before the trade war, Taiwanese companies were worried about increased labor costs in China and that many of the incentives used to lure them had dried up, she said.
“They’re not getting special treatment as much and the cost benefit — they can find lower costs elsewhere. It’s been more sort of a diversification rather than a relocation,” Rigger said.
The trade war has only added to concerns, with Taiwan among Asia’s most vulnerable economies given that China and Hong Kong account for 40 percent of its exports.
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) favors being much less economically reliant on China, urging firms to return to Taiwan.
Some have heeded her call.
As of April, about 40 companies, including Giant, have committed to investing a combined US$6.7 billion and creating 21,200 jobs.
However, relocation remains hugely controversial, with business owners fearful of being punished by China and many asking Taipei not to reveal their names or details.
Still, Tu was adamant that Giant is committed to manufacturing in China, which remains “a very important market.”
She portrayed the opening of new assembly lines in Taiwan — and a factory in Hungary — as part of a need to be closer to consumers, saying: “We are a global company.”
However, she agreed that the trade dispute had morphed from initial “jitters” to “a new reality.”
“I think I suddenly realized maybe it won’t go away,” Tu said. “I think the war is here. And we have got to have a long-term plan.”
CHIP RACE: Three years of overbroad export controls drove foreign competitors to pursue their own AI chips, and ‘cost US taxpayers billions of dollars,’ Nvidia said China has figured out the US strategy for allowing it to buy Nvidia Corp’s H200s and is rejecting the artificial intelligence (AI) chip in favor of domestically developed semiconductors, White House AI adviser David Sacks said, citing news reports. US President Donald Trump on Monday said that he would allow shipments of Nvidia’s H200 chips to China, part of an administration effort backed by Sacks to challenge Chinese tech champions such as Huawei Technologies Co (華為) by bringing US competition to their home market. On Friday, Sacks signaled that he was uncertain about whether that approach would work. “They’re rejecting our chips,” Sacks
Taiwan’s exports soared 56 percent year-on-year to an all-time high of US$64.05 billion last month, propelled by surging global demand for artificial intelligence (AI), high-performance computing and cloud service infrastructure, the Ministry of Finance said yesterday. Department of Statistics Director-General Beatrice Tsai (蔡美娜) called the figure an unexpected upside surprise, citing a wave of technology orders from overseas customers alongside the usual year-end shopping season for technology products. Growth is likely to remain strong this month, she said, projecting a 40 percent to 45 percent expansion on an annual basis. The outperformance could prompt the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and
NATIONAL SECURITY: Intel’s testing of ACM tools despite US government control ‘highlights egregious gaps in US technology protection policies,’ a former official said Chipmaker Intel Corp has tested chipmaking tools this year from a toolmaker with deep roots in China and two overseas units that were targeted by US sanctions, according to two sources with direct knowledge of the matter. Intel, which fended off calls for its CEO’s resignation from US President Donald Trump in August over his alleged ties to China, got the tools from ACM Research Inc, a Fremont, California-based producer of chipmaking equipment. Two of ACM’s units, based in Shanghai and South Korea, were among a number of firms barred last year from receiving US technology over claims they have
BARRIERS: Gudeng’s chairman said it was unlikely that the US could replicate Taiwan’s science parks in Arizona, given its strict immigration policies and cultural differences Gudeng Precision Industrial Co (家登), which supplies wafer pods to the world’s major semiconductor firms, yesterday said it is in no rush to set up production in the US due to high costs. The company supplies its customers through a warehouse in Arizona jointly operated by TSS Holdings Ltd (德鑫控股), a joint holding of Gudeng and 17 Taiwanese firms in the semiconductor supply chain, including specialty plastic compounds producer Nytex Composites Co (耐特) and automated material handling system supplier Symtek Automation Asia Co (迅得). While the company has long been exploring the feasibility of setting up production in the US to address