Plans by US President Barack Obama to curb risk-taking by banks are unlikely to adversely affect Asia’s risk-averse financial institutions, analysts said.
The proposed measures, which aim to roll back corporate excesses and limit dangerous risk-taking on Wall Street, could even be beneficial to Asia because US banks may have to move their hedge fund businesses to the region, they said. Shane Oliver, an economist with Australia’s AMP Capital Investors, said it was unlikely regulation of Asian banks would be beefed up.
“Asian banks didn’t run into the sort of trouble that the US ran into through this crisis and it’s unlikely that we’ll see radical regulatory change across Asia,” he said. “There’s no need [for Asia’s regulators] to be heavy-handed in the way that President Obama is.”
Daniel Tabbush, head of regional banks research for Hong Kong-based brokerage CLSA, said that except for banking giant HSBC — which has a major presence in the US — he did not see any banks in Asia being threatened by Obama’s proposals.
Shinichi Ina, a Credit Suisse analyst in Japan, said that the plan, if passed by the US Congress, would likely be limited to operations in the US.
“For it to take effect in Europe or Japan you’d have to ask cooperation from regulators there and engineer a comprehensive regulation scheme,” he said.
Although Asia’s financial institutions did not escape the worldwide financial crisis completely unscathed, their losses were dwarfed by those suffered by their Western peers — thanks at least partly to lessons learned from the Asian financial crisis of 1997, which left the region with a more prudent investment approach.
Most of the Asian banks are commercial with relatively small investment banking services and very little proprietary trading, said Billy Mak (麥萃才), associate professor of finance at Hong Kong Baptist University.
And unlike many central banks in the West, countries like India and China already have a liquidity requirement in place, he said.
Quanta Computer Inc (廣達) chairman Barry Lam (林百里) is expected to share his views about the artificial intelligence (AI) industry’s prospects during his speech at the company’s 37th anniversary ceremony, as AI servers have become a new growth engine for the equipment manufacturing service provider. Lam’s speech is much anticipated, as Quanta has risen as one of the world’s major AI server suppliers. The company reported a 30 percent year-on-year growth in consolidated revenue to NT$1.41 trillion (US$43.35 billion) last year, thanks to fast-growing demand for servers, especially those with AI capabilities. The company told investors in November last year that
Intel Corp has named Tasha Chuang (莊蓓瑜) to lead Intel Taiwan in a bid to reinforce relations between the company and its Taiwanese partners. The appointment of Chuang as general manager for Intel Taiwan takes effect on Thursday, the firm said in a statement yesterday. Chuang is to lead her team in Taiwan to pursue product development and sales growth in an effort to reinforce the company’s ties with its partners and clients, Intel said. Chuang was previously in charge of managing Intel’s ties with leading Taiwanese PC brand Asustek Computer Inc (華碩), which included helping Asustek strengthen its global businesses, the company
Taiwanese suppliers to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC, 台積電) are expected to follow the contract chipmaker’s step to invest in the US, but their relocation may be seven to eight years away, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said yesterday. When asked by opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Niu Hsu-ting (牛煦庭) in the legislature about growing concerns that TSMC’s huge investments in the US will prompt its suppliers to follow suit, Kuo said based on the chipmaker’s current limited production volume, it is unlikely to lead its supply chain to go there for now. “Unless TSMC completes its planned six
TikTok abounds with viral videos accusing prestigious brands of secretly manufacturing luxury goods in China so they can be sold at cut prices. However, while these “revelations” are spurious, behind them lurks a well-oiled machine for selling counterfeit goods that is making the most of the confusion surrounding trade tariffs. Chinese content creators who portray themselves as workers or subcontractors in the luxury goods business claim that Beijing has lifted confidentiality clauses on local subcontractors as a way to respond to the huge hike in customs duties imposed on China by US President Donald Trump. They say this Chinese decision, of which Agence