Facebook and Twitter stars on Saturday shared lessons learned with young entrepreneurs aspiring to be the next hot technology firm.
Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg and Twitter co-founders Evan Williams and Biz Stone were among speakers at a daylong Startup School conducted by Y Combinator.
“It’s really awesome to be here,” Zuckerberg said as he joined Combinator’s Jessica Livingston on stage in a packed auditorium at the University of California, Berkeley.
“This is, like, my people. One of the things cool about the Y Combinator program is you have these T-shirts that say ‘Build something people want.’ I think that is right on,” he said.
Y Combinator, established in the Silicon Valley city of Mountain View in 2005, takes small stakes in startups in exchange for grooming them and exposing them to investors.
“We prefer groups with a lot of technical depth,” Y Combinator says on its Web site.
“We care more about how smart you are than how old you are and more about the quality of your ideas than whether you have a formal business plan,” it says.
More than 1,600 aspiring entrepreneurs applied to be in the class on Saturday at Startup School, which is held once a year.
A nearly 800-seat auditorium was filled to capacity.
Twitter sprang from a “two-week hack day” at Odeo, a podcasting company that Williams took part in starting after leaving a job at Google in 2004, the founders said in an on-stage chat with Livingston.
“I remember early on someone saying Twitter is fun but it isn’t useful and Ev said ‘So what? So is ice cream,’” Stone said while warning to be wary of skeptics. “We liked it. So we kept working on it.”
Since Twitter was entering new terrain with a microblogging service, Stone and Williams had faith in their idea, but little market data.
“One thing I’ve always admired about Google is they are good at saying this thing is huge and we are going to kick ass and do it better than anyone else; they did it with search and advertising,” Williams said.
“With Twitter, there was no market; no possible way to justify an investment other than it made us laugh and it’s really cool,” Williams said.
Twitter was able to incubate in Odeo, sparing its creators from pitching what “sounded like a stupid idea” to investors, the founders said.
Among the questions dogging Twitter today is how it is going to cash in on its global popularity.
“We’ve never had any doubt that if you create something popular you can make money,” Williams said.
Twitter’s biggest challenge is capitalizing on its position before a competing technology firm tries to commandeer the microblogging market,” Williams said.
“Things are going well and the stakes are really high,” Williams said. “We are going to face serious competition.”
Another challenge facing Twitter is preserving the company’s culture of doing social and environmental good woven as the small firm grows, Stone said.
“Twitter is two years old and in the global spotlight,” Stone said.
“We don’t want to be like the child actor that found fame early and grew up all funky and freaky. Part of working at Twitter is giving back to the world,” he said.
Stone said it is possible Twitter could go public with an offering of stock, but that he is hoping the company will find more creative ways to fund its growth.
“It sounds silly, with no revenue, to talk about going public, but I wouldn’t say that is ridiculous anymore,” Stone said.
“Our goal is to change the world. The needs of the platform mean growing bigger. At some point going public may make the most sense,” he said.
Zuckerberg said the creation of Facebook boiled down to a Harvard University student with hacker tendencies starting a company with smart friends.
“By the time I got around to building Facebook, I did it in two weeks,” Zuckerberg said. “Launch early and iterate; Facebook is a really good story of that.”
The evolution of Facebook has been driven by what members of the online social networking community do at the Web site and their feedback, Zuckerberg said.
“We pride ourselves on building stuff quickly,” Zuckerberg said. “We have this technology company that is really like a hacker company. My friends are people who really like building cool stuff.”
Quanta Computer Inc (廣達) chairman Barry Lam (林百里) is expected to share his views about the artificial intelligence (AI) industry’s prospects during his speech at the company’s 37th anniversary ceremony, as AI servers have become a new growth engine for the equipment manufacturing service provider. Lam’s speech is much anticipated, as Quanta has risen as one of the world’s major AI server suppliers. The company reported a 30 percent year-on-year growth in consolidated revenue to NT$1.41 trillion (US$43.35 billion) last year, thanks to fast-growing demand for servers, especially those with AI capabilities. The company told investors in November last year that
Intel Corp has named Tasha Chuang (莊蓓瑜) to lead Intel Taiwan in a bid to reinforce relations between the company and its Taiwanese partners. The appointment of Chuang as general manager for Intel Taiwan takes effect on Thursday, the firm said in a statement yesterday. Chuang is to lead her team in Taiwan to pursue product development and sales growth in an effort to reinforce the company’s ties with its partners and clients, Intel said. Chuang was previously in charge of managing Intel’s ties with leading Taiwanese PC brand Asustek Computer Inc (華碩), which included helping Asustek strengthen its global businesses, the company
Taiwanese suppliers to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC, 台積電) are expected to follow the contract chipmaker’s step to invest in the US, but their relocation may be seven to eight years away, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said yesterday. When asked by opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Niu Hsu-ting (牛煦庭) in the legislature about growing concerns that TSMC’s huge investments in the US will prompt its suppliers to follow suit, Kuo said based on the chipmaker’s current limited production volume, it is unlikely to lead its supply chain to go there for now. “Unless TSMC completes its planned six
TikTok abounds with viral videos accusing prestigious brands of secretly manufacturing luxury goods in China so they can be sold at cut prices. However, while these “revelations” are spurious, behind them lurks a well-oiled machine for selling counterfeit goods that is making the most of the confusion surrounding trade tariffs. Chinese content creators who portray themselves as workers or subcontractors in the luxury goods business claim that Beijing has lifted confidentiality clauses on local subcontractors as a way to respond to the huge hike in customs duties imposed on China by US President Donald Trump. They say this Chinese decision, of which Agence