British Prime Minister Gordon Brown on Friday warned the UK’s G8 partners against a retreat into isolationism and insisted that the looming threat to the global economy instead required a speeding up of the fight to tackle climate change and poverty.
Amid fears that the credit crunch will cause the G8 to backpedal on pledges to cut carbon emissions and increase aid to poor countries by US$50 billion a year, the prime minister used an interview with the London-based Guardian ahead of next week’s G8 summit to stress the need for united action in the West to reduce dependency on fossil fuels and boost food production in developing countries.
“The world is suffering a triple challenge: of higher fuel prices, higher food prices and a credit crunch. My message to the G8 will be that instead of sidelining climate change and the development agenda, the present economic crisis means that instead of relaxing our efforts we have got to accelerate them.
“This agenda is not just the key to the environment and reducing poverty, but the key to our economic future as well,” Brown said.
After a year that has seen growth slow sharply in many G8 countries, including the UK, and oil prices double to US$145 a barrel, he said the summit would be judged on whether it rolled back protectionism, supported projects for cleaner energy, and came up with blueprints for reducing global oil and food prices.
On the eve of his first G8 summit as prime minister, he said he would consider it to be a success if the G8 showed unity, gave strong backing to a new global free-trade deal, and pushed ahead on climate change and development.
The prime minister said that the state of the global economy meant the summit would have echoes of those in the 1970s.
“But in the 70s, many of the problems we faced were national, not global. The problems we have today are global and they require global solutions,” he said.
On climate change, Brown said he was hoping the G8 would make progress towards a new climate change deal in Copenhagen next year, agree to “turn the World Bank into an energy bank as well as a development bank,” and show a “clear understanding of the importance of renewables to our energy and environmental future.”
The UK believes that a stalling of progress on Africa this year will make it impossible for the UN to hit its millennium development goals, set for 2015, but Brown said that fighting poverty was also in the best interests of the west.
“Unless we help poor countries to become more prosperous through education, health and economic development, we will be piling up the problems of global inequality,” he said.
The UK is pressing the G8 to boost the number of health workers in poor countries, bankroll the expansion of education and invest in higher farm production.
“I’ll be telling people that the worst possible thing would be to drop the development agenda because it holds the key to the economic challenge. If we don’t produce enough agriculture, we are going to have food shortages, and Africa needs help to develop its agriculture. We can’t solve the problems of food and fuel shortages unless developing countries are involved,” he said.
Christian Aid supported Brown’s call for higher food production in developing countries, but said free trade had proved disastrous for many struggling nations. Oliver Pearce, author of a report released yesterday by the development charity, said: “Food security will be high on the agenda when the G8 meets. Rich countries must accept that nothing less than a new, pro-poor agricultural revolution is needed if future shortages are to be avoided.
“Agricultural polices imposed on poor countries in the past few decades have had a ruinous effect. In return for trade and aid, they have been forced to remove protective tariffs from agricultural produce, reduce subsidies and lift price controls,” he said.
Development charities blame the increase in land given over to biofuels for the food crisis, but the prime minister was noncommittal on the issue.
“I feel there are good and bad biofuels,” he said, in advance of the imminent publication of the UK government’s Gallagher report into their impact.
Quanta Computer Inc (廣達) chairman Barry Lam (林百里) is expected to share his views about the artificial intelligence (AI) industry’s prospects during his speech at the company’s 37th anniversary ceremony, as AI servers have become a new growth engine for the equipment manufacturing service provider. Lam’s speech is much anticipated, as Quanta has risen as one of the world’s major AI server suppliers. The company reported a 30 percent year-on-year growth in consolidated revenue to NT$1.41 trillion (US$43.35 billion) last year, thanks to fast-growing demand for servers, especially those with AI capabilities. The company told investors in November last year that
Intel Corp has named Tasha Chuang (莊蓓瑜) to lead Intel Taiwan in a bid to reinforce relations between the company and its Taiwanese partners. The appointment of Chuang as general manager for Intel Taiwan takes effect on Thursday, the firm said in a statement yesterday. Chuang is to lead her team in Taiwan to pursue product development and sales growth in an effort to reinforce the company’s ties with its partners and clients, Intel said. Chuang was previously in charge of managing Intel’s ties with leading Taiwanese PC brand Asustek Computer Inc (華碩), which included helping Asustek strengthen its global businesses, the company
Taiwanese suppliers to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC, 台積電) are expected to follow the contract chipmaker’s step to invest in the US, but their relocation may be seven to eight years away, Minister of Economic Affairs J.W. Kuo (郭智輝) said yesterday. When asked by opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Niu Hsu-ting (牛煦庭) in the legislature about growing concerns that TSMC’s huge investments in the US will prompt its suppliers to follow suit, Kuo said based on the chipmaker’s current limited production volume, it is unlikely to lead its supply chain to go there for now. “Unless TSMC completes its planned six
TikTok abounds with viral videos accusing prestigious brands of secretly manufacturing luxury goods in China so they can be sold at cut prices. However, while these “revelations” are spurious, behind them lurks a well-oiled machine for selling counterfeit goods that is making the most of the confusion surrounding trade tariffs. Chinese content creators who portray themselves as workers or subcontractors in the luxury goods business claim that Beijing has lifted confidentiality clauses on local subcontractors as a way to respond to the huge hike in customs duties imposed on China by US President Donald Trump. They say this Chinese decision, of which Agence