The saying goes that money can’t buy happiness. But inquiring economists have been working for decades trying to prove or disprove the notion.
Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Business released a study last month showing “a clear positive link” between wealth and “subjective well-being,” based on global surveys.
While this may seem logical to some, the research flew in the face of a long-standing theory that happiness of a country’s population does not rise with income, after certain basic needs are met.
This theory, dubbed the “Easterlin Paradox,” was developed in 1974 by Richard Easterlin, an economist now on the faculty at the University of Southern California.
Easterlin’s research had drawn on surveys notably from Japan, where surveys had shown little or no increase in national happiness despite the country’s post-World War II economic miracle.
FLAWS FOUND
Wharton economists Betsey Stevenson and Justin Wolfers contend in the new research that better data over the past three decades and a closer analysis suggests the Easterlin Paradox is flawed.
They found that the wealthiest countries in terms of GDP per capita rank near the top of surveys on happiness, with the poorest at the bottom.
More significantly, within each country, higher incomes translated to higher ratings of life satisfaction, they found.
“There appears to be a very strong relationship between subjective well-being and income, which holds for both rich and poor countries, falsifying earlier claims of a satiation point at which higher GDP is not associated with greater well-being,” they said in a paper to be published by the Brookings Institution.
“The Easterlin Paradox says that what I care about is my relative ranking in society,” Stevenson said. “It says economic development doesn’t matter at all — that the United States is no better off in 2008 than it was in 1920.”
The results have important implications for public policy. Stevenson and Wolfers note that economic growth might not be considered an important policy goal if it does little to raise well-being.
The Wharton researchers said multi-nation surveys such as the Gallup World Poll and the Pew Global Attitudes Survey reveal “quite powerful effects of income on happiness.”
NO SATIATION POINT
“There is no evidence of a satiation point,” Wolfers said. “Even as rich counties get richer they appear to get happier.”
The researchers said they were not seeking to make any political point or support an ideology.
Although backers of the Easterlin theory say it argues against unbridled pro-growth capitalism, Stevenson said the new research could also be used to promote more distribution of wealth.
“A 10 percent increase in income for a poor person will give you the same gain [in happiness] as a 10 percent gain for a rich person but it would cost a lot less,” she said.
Accordingly, she said redistributing income from the rich to the poor could increase a country’s overall happiness quotient.
Easterlin, meanwhile, stands by his research, updated several times since the 1970s. In a 2004 paper, he said surveys continue to support his thesis.
“Contrary to what economic theory assumes, more money does not make people happier,” he wrote.
“Most people could increase their happiness by devoting less time to making money, and more to non pecuniary goals such as family life and health,” Easterlin said.
“It’s necessary to separate shorter term fluctuations in which GDP and happiness are positively related from the long-term association between growth and happiness,” Easterlin said in an e-mail
“The conclusions of [the Wharton] paper appear to be based on the short-term association and do not contradict the findings regarding the longer term.”
The new research meanwhile has set off a fierce debate among academics.
Andrew Oswald from Britain’s Warwick University and visiting fellow at Cornell University— a self-described “happiness economist”— called the Wharton paper “interesting” but argued that “the bulk of the evidence is on Easterlin’s side.”
Oswald, who has studied the issue for 15 years, said, “There is extremely strong evidence that we are no happier than in the 1970s across the industrialized countries.”
He said Easterlin’s research “is about 80 to 90 percent right.”
“Economic growth buys only the most marginal amount of happiness for a country that is already rich. But in developing countries, there is very little dispute — economic growth does make people happier,” Oswald said.
QUESTIONS REMAIN
Angus Deaton, a Princeton University economist, said Stevenson and Wolfers expanded on some of his research, and that “they are raising questions that are important” about the link between money and happiness.
But he added: “I think the question is far from settled. There may be some parts of the Easterlin Paradox that are still valid.”
One problem, Deaton said, is that it is difficult for surveys to identify happiness and separate that from other measurements of well being.
“These surveys ask people how happy you are,” Deaton said. “The problem is you could think your life was great overall, but not be particularly happy.”
WASHINGTON’S INCENTIVES: The CHIPS Act set aside US$39 billion in direct grants to persuade the world’s top semiconductor companies to make chips on US soil The US plans to award more than US$6 billion to Samsung Electronics Co, helping the chipmaker expand beyond a project in Texas it has already announced, people familiar with the matter said. The money from the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act would be one of several major awards that the US Department of Commerce is expected to announce in the coming weeks, including a grant of more than US$5 billion to Samsung’s rival, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), people familiar with the plans said. The people spoke on condition of anonymity in advance of the official announcements. The federal funding for
HIGH DEMAND: The firm has strong capabilities of providing key components including liquid cooling technology needed for AI servers, chairman Young Liu said Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密) yesterday revised its revenue outlook for this year to “significant” growth from a “neutral” view forecast five months ago, due to strong demand for artificial intelligence (AI) servers from cloud service providers. Hon Hai, a major assembler of iPhones that is also known as Foxconn, expects AI server revenues to soar more than 40 percent annually this year, chairman Young Liu (劉揚偉) told investors. The robust growth would uplift revenue contribution from AI servers to 40 percent of the company’s overall server revenue this year, from 30 percent last year, Liu said. In the three-year period
LONG HAUL: Largan Energy Materials’ TNO-based lithium-ion batteries are expected to charge in five minutes and last about 20 years, far surpassing conventional technology Largan Precision Co (大立光) has formed a joint venture with the Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI, 工研院) to produce fast-charging, long-life lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles, mobile electronics and electric storage units, the camera lens supplier for Apple Inc’s iPhones said yesterday. Largan Energy Materials Co (萬溢能源材料), established in January, is developing high-energy, fast-charging, long-life lithium-ion batteries using titanium niobium oxide (TNO) anodes, it said. TNO-based batteries can be fully charged in five minutes and have a lifespan of 20 years, a major advantage over the two to four hours of charging time needed for conventional graphite-anode-based batteries, Largan said in a
Taiwan is one of the first countries to benefit from the artificial intelligence (AI) boom, but because that is largely down to a single company it also represents a risk, former Google Taiwan managing director Chien Lee-feng (簡立峰) said at an AI forum in Taipei yesterday. Speaking at the forum on how generative AI can generate possibilities for all walks of life, Chien said Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) — currently among the world’s 10 most-valuable companies due to continued optimism about AI — ensures Taiwan is one of the economies to benefit most from AI. “This is because AI is