How much oil do we have left? According to the United States Geological Survey's (USGS) latest report, published in 2000, the planet had 3 trillion barrels of oil and gas before we started using it up. It calculates we have used some 700 billion, leaving 2.3 trillion barrels underground.
A simple calculation using data from the Center for Global Energy Studies (CGES) shows that with 28.8 billion barrels currently being used a year (79 million a day), there is some 80 years of supply left in the ground.
However, the 2.3 billion barrels left includes 1.4 billion which, according to USGS analysis of global geology, exist but have yet to be discovered. That leaves roughly 890 billion barrels of oil and gas that have been discovered and are booked as proven reserves -- roughly 31 years' supply.
This estimate is lower than the industry's. BP's oil statistics -- the industry bible -- indicate some 1,047 billion barrels of proved reserves -- 36 years supply on current usage.
But analysts don't worry about this too much. Derek Butter of consultancy Wood Mackenzie says: "It is not something we get hung up about. We think in the medium term there is enough oil in reserve."
The BP statistics show that over the past decade, reserves have been roughly constant -- in 1992 there were 1,006 billion barrels -- indicating that through the 1990s the industry has been effective at finding reserves to replace the resources we use. It has done well -- in 1982, the figure was only 676 billion.
Manouchehr Takin of the CGES says: "Forty years ago, economists and geologists said there were 40 years of oil and gas left. Now they are saying the same."
He adds: "The techniques for finding oil and extracting it are advancing rapidly. It shows that at any one time what is left, and the time it will take to use this up is only a snapshot dictated by the current state of knowledge. And, of course, there is the impact of economic development, and the efficiency with which we use energy."
Efficient energy use, he argues, has offset the growth of formerly non-industrialised countries, such as India and China, which have anyway not grown as rapidly as was expected in the Sixties and Seventies. Similar dynamics are likely to continue.
Nevertheless, demand for oil is likely to increase, as, over time, is the price. Former UK Environment Minister Michael Meacher pointed to a crunch by 2015, when he says demand is likely to total some 60 million barrels a day more than the current 79 million, while supplies will only be some 90 million.
CGES argues that Meacher has overstated the increase in demand. It argues that taking reserves into account, his estimates imply 4 percent growth a year, whereas, depending on price, CGES forecasts between 1 percent and 1.3 percent, while OPEC has 1.7 percent.
At the top end of its range, CGES believes demand will be 87.7 million barrels a day, within its expected production level.
Nevertheless, as Wood Mackenzie points out, nothing can be taken for granted. In a note last week it said: "There is no escaping the fact that oil and gas are finite resources: the more that has been found, the less that remains to be found."
The crux is this: Will exploring and finding new reserves be worth it for companies? Theory suggests that as easy resources are depleted extraction becomes more difficult, but that reduction in supply increases price, underpinning the eventual return for companies.
Wood Mackenzie is sceptical. It points out that between them major western countries need to find reserves equivalent to Angola's every 15 months just to stand still.
It shows that new areas such as Alaska face difficulties because of extreme environmental sensitivities and regulatory concerns. Other areas, such as Nigeria, and newer ones, such as Benin, are uncertain.
Companies must take greater risks -- such as exploration in ever deeper water, and expensive investment in extraction from shale beds.
And it points out that reserve replacement has often been achieved by shuffling finds into the proved category rather than actually finding more oil (which underlines the importance of Shell's declassification of reserves).
Eventually, it will be down to consumers to decide when the price of oil and gas makes it no longer worthwhile investing in things that are powered by them. It is likely, concedes Takin, to be well before our notional 2.3 trillion barrels are used up ... whenever that may be.
WEAKER ACTIVITY: The sharpest deterioration was seen in the electronics and optical components sector, with the production index falling 13.2 points to 44.5 Taiwan’s manufacturing sector last month contracted for a second consecutive month, with the purchasing managers’ index (PMI) slipping to 48, reflecting ongoing caution over trade uncertainties, the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research (CIER, 中華經濟研究院) said yesterday. The decline reflects growing caution among companies amid uncertainty surrounding US tariffs, semiconductor duties and automotive import levies, and it is also likely linked to fading front-loading activity, CIER president Lien Hsien-ming (連賢明) said. “Some clients have started shifting orders to Southeast Asian countries where tariff regimes are already clear,” Lien told a news conference. Firms across the supply chain are also lowering stock levels to mitigate
Six Taiwanese companies, including contract chipmaker Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), made the 2025 Fortune Global 500 list of the world’s largest firms by revenue. In a report published by New York-based Fortune magazine on Tuesday, Hon Hai Precision Industry Co (鴻海精密), also known as Foxconn Technology Group (富士康科技集團), ranked highest among Taiwanese firms, placing 28th with revenue of US$213.69 billion. Up 60 spots from last year, TSMC rose to No. 126 with US$90.16 billion in revenue, followed by Quanta Computer Inc (廣達) at 348th, Pegatron Corp (和碩) at 461st, CPC Corp, Taiwan (台灣中油) at 494th and Wistron Corp (緯創) at
NEGOTIATIONS: Semiconductors play an outsized role in Taiwan’s industrial and economic development and are a major driver of the Taiwan-US trade imbalance With US President Donald Trump threatening to impose tariffs on semiconductors, Taiwan is expected to face a significant challenge, as information and communications technology (ICT) products account for more than 70 percent of its exports to the US, Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research (CIER, 中華經濟研究院) president Lien Hsien-ming (連賢明) said on Friday. Compared with other countries, semiconductors play a disproportionately large role in Taiwan’s industrial and economic development, Lien said. As the sixth-largest contributor to the US trade deficit, Taiwan recorded a US$73.9 billion trade surplus with the US last year — up from US$47.8 billion in 2023 — driven by strong
ASE Technology Holding Co (ASE, 日月光投控), the world’s biggest chip assembly and testing service provider, yesterday said it would boost equipment capital expenditure by up to 16 percent for this year to cope with strong customer demand for artificial intelligence (AI) applications. Aside from AI, a growing demand for semiconductors used in the automotive and industrial sectors is to drive ASE’s capacity next year, the Kaohsiung-based company said. “We do see the disparity between AI and other general sectors, and that pretty much aligns the scenario in the first half of this year,” ASE chief operating officer Tien Wu (吳田玉) told an