Plans for a new UK digital ID are sparking widespread public concern, but some critics including far-right politicians are fueling fears with unproven claims that it would be used to boost government control over people’s lives.
They warn that the digital ID would be used to store data on vaccinations and carbon footprint, and limit access to flying and food, which the government has vehemently denied.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer in September said that the ID card would be introduced by 2029. The government has said it would not be mandatory, but would be required to prove the right to work.
Photo: EPA
Nigel Farage, the leader of anti-immigration party Reform, claimed on TV channel GB News that medical data would soon be added and those unvaccinated would be treated as “second-class citizens.”
“Step out of line, say something they don’t like and they will switch you off: no travel, no car, no spending, no life,” said Renee Hoenderkamp, a doctor and commentator on GB News, a right-wing television channel.
“None of these claims have any factual basis. We have been clear: digital ID will not be compulsory and it will not be a crime not to have one,” a British government spokesperson said.
“Digital ID will give people more control over how their data is used and ensure everyone can access the public services they need,” the government spokesperson said.
The plan is highly controversial in the UK — where the idea of an ID has long been resisted — and the main opposition parties are against it.
Public support for digital ID fell after Starmer’s announcement.
Think tank More in Common in late September found that 45 percent opposed it and 31 percent backed it, down from 53 percent support late last year.
Nearly 3 million people have signed a petition against the plan, triggering a debate in parliament’s Westminster Hall on Dec. 8.
“It is certainly not a fringe issue. This is a mainstream political issue with concerns shared by people in the highest echelons of politics,” said Silkie Carlo, director of the Big Brother Watch advocacy group, who addressed lawmakers about civil liberty fears.
Ryan Wain, executive director of politics and policy at the Tony Blair Institute think tank, said that the British government needs to “make a broader case” for the digital ID, which Blair has long backed.
“Otherwise, a vacuum is left”, Wain said, adding that this is filled by people “whose default is to think the worst of the best intentions.”
TikTok creators have posted artificial intelligence-generated videos of huge demonstrations against the digital ID in central London, racking up millions of views, although actual street protests have been relatively small.
Some opponents previously campaigned against public health restrictions and linked the digital ID to those measures.
A popular post showed an image of Chinese kindergarten pupils lined up with QR codes to take COVID-19 tests in 2022, with the caption: “What happens when you say no?”
David Icke, a prominent British conspiracy theorist who dismissed COVID-19 as a “hoax,” took part in a march against the digital ID in London last month.
Hundreds participated in the march whose organizer, law student Fiona Hine, was previously arrested at anti-lockdown demonstrations.
“This is entirely about freedom and freedom of choice — nothing should be imposed on us,” Hine said.
The digital ID was a topic during past anti-lockdown rallies, with protesters “talking about how it will be like China” and a “sign of an authoritarian state,” said Ozge Ozduzen, a lecturer in digital media at Sheffield University.
Repeating popular conspiratorial tropes, Hine claimed that the digital ID is being planned by an international “elite” — including Blair and Klaus Schwab, the founder of the World Economic Forum — who want people to be “robots and worker bees for the government.”
FAKE NEWS? ‘When the government demands the press become a state mouthpiece under the threat of punishment, something has gone very wrong,’ a civic group said The top US broadcast regulator on Saturday threatened media outlets over negative coverage of the Middle East war, after US President Donald Trump slammed critical headlines from the “Fake News Media.” The US president since his first term has derided mainstream media as “fake news” and has sued major outlets over what he sees as unfair coverage. Brendan Carr, head of the US Federal Communications Commission — which oversees the nation’s radio, television and Internet media — said broadcasters risked losing their licenses over news coverage. “The law is clear. Broadcasters must operate in the public interest, and they will
INFLUTENTIAL THEORIST: Habermas was particularly critical of the ‘limited interest’ shown by German politicians in ‘shaping a politically effective Europe Jurgen Habermas, whose work on communication, rationality and sociology made him one of the world’s most influential philosophers and a key intellectual figure in his native Germany, has died. He was 96. Habermas’ publisher, Suhrkamp, said he died on Saturday in Starnberg, near Munich. Habermas frequently weighed in on political matters over several decades. His extensive writing crossed the boundaries of academic and philosophical disciplines, providing a vision of modern society and social interaction. His best-known works included the two-volume Theory of Communicative Action. Habermas, who was 15 at the time of Nazi Germany’s defeat, later recalled the dawn of
A ship that appears to be taking on the identity of a scrapped gas carrier exited the Strait of Hormuz on Friday, showing how strategies to get through the waterway are evolving as the Middle East war progresses. The vessel identifying as liquefied natural gas (LNG) carrier Jamal left the Strait on Friday morning, ship-tracking data show. However, the same tanker was also recorded as having beached at an Indian demolition yard in October last year, where it is being broken up, according to market participants and port agent’s reports. The ship claiming to be Jamal is likely a zombie vessel that
The Chinese public maintains relatively warm sentiments toward Taiwan and strongly prefers non-military paths to improving cross-strait relations, a recent survey conducted by the Atlanta, Georgia-based Carter Center and Emory University showed. The “China Pulse” research project, which polled 2,506 adults between Oct. 27 last year and Jan. 1 this year, found that 86 percent of respondents support strengthening cultural ties, while 81 percent favor deepening economic interaction. The report, co-authored by political scientists at Emory University and advisors at the Carter Center, indicates that the Chinese public views Taiwan’s importance through a lens of shared history and culture rather than geopolitical
RSS