Plans for a new UK digital ID are sparking widespread public concern, but some critics including far-right politicians are fueling fears with unproven claims that it would be used to boost government control over people’s lives.
They warn that the digital ID would be used to store data on vaccinations and carbon footprint, and limit access to flying and food, which the government has vehemently denied.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer in September said that the ID card would be introduced by 2029. The government has said it would not be mandatory, but would be required to prove the right to work.
Photo: EPA
Nigel Farage, the leader of anti-immigration party Reform, claimed on TV channel GB News that medical data would soon be added and those unvaccinated would be treated as “second-class citizens.”
“Step out of line, say something they don’t like and they will switch you off: no travel, no car, no spending, no life,” said Renee Hoenderkamp, a doctor and commentator on GB News, a right-wing television channel.
“None of these claims have any factual basis. We have been clear: digital ID will not be compulsory and it will not be a crime not to have one,” a British government spokesperson said.
“Digital ID will give people more control over how their data is used and ensure everyone can access the public services they need,” the government spokesperson said.
The plan is highly controversial in the UK — where the idea of an ID has long been resisted — and the main opposition parties are against it.
Public support for digital ID fell after Starmer’s announcement.
Think tank More in Common in late September found that 45 percent opposed it and 31 percent backed it, down from 53 percent support late last year.
Nearly 3 million people have signed a petition against the plan, triggering a debate in parliament’s Westminster Hall on Dec. 8.
“It is certainly not a fringe issue. This is a mainstream political issue with concerns shared by people in the highest echelons of politics,” said Silkie Carlo, director of the Big Brother Watch advocacy group, who addressed lawmakers about civil liberty fears.
Ryan Wain, executive director of politics and policy at the Tony Blair Institute think tank, said that the British government needs to “make a broader case” for the digital ID, which Blair has long backed.
“Otherwise, a vacuum is left”, Wain said, adding that this is filled by people “whose default is to think the worst of the best intentions.”
TikTok creators have posted artificial intelligence-generated videos of huge demonstrations against the digital ID in central London, racking up millions of views, although actual street protests have been relatively small.
Some opponents previously campaigned against public health restrictions and linked the digital ID to those measures.
A popular post showed an image of Chinese kindergarten pupils lined up with QR codes to take COVID-19 tests in 2022, with the caption: “What happens when you say no?”
David Icke, a prominent British conspiracy theorist who dismissed COVID-19 as a “hoax,” took part in a march against the digital ID in London last month.
Hundreds participated in the march whose organizer, law student Fiona Hine, was previously arrested at anti-lockdown demonstrations.
“This is entirely about freedom and freedom of choice — nothing should be imposed on us,” Hine said.
The digital ID was a topic during past anti-lockdown rallies, with protesters “talking about how it will be like China” and a “sign of an authoritarian state,” said Ozge Ozduzen, a lecturer in digital media at Sheffield University.
Repeating popular conspiratorial tropes, Hine claimed that the digital ID is being planned by an international “elite” — including Blair and Klaus Schwab, the founder of the World Economic Forum — who want people to be “robots and worker bees for the government.”
VAGUE: The criteria of the amnesty remain unclear, but it would cover political violence from 1999 to today, and those convicted of murder or drug trafficking would not qualify Venezuelan Acting President Delcy Rodriguez on Friday announced an amnesty bill that could lead to the release of hundreds of prisoners, including opposition leaders, journalists and human rights activists detained for political reasons. The measure had long been sought by the US-backed opposition. It is the latest concession Rodriguez has made since taking the reins of the country on Jan. 3 after the brazen seizure of then-Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro. Rodriguez told a gathering of justices, magistrates, ministers, military brass and other government leaders that the ruling party-controlled Venezuelan National Assembly would take up the bill with urgency. Rodriguez also announced the shutdown
Civil society leaders and members of a left-wing coalition yesterday filed impeachment complaints against Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte, restarting a process sidelined by the Supreme Court last year. Both cases accuse Duterte of misusing public funds during her term as education secretary, while one revives allegations that she threatened to assassinate former ally Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. The filings come on the same day that a committee in the House of Representatives was to begin hearings into impeachment complaints against Marcos, accused of corruption tied to a spiraling scandal over bogus flood control projects. Under the constitution, an impeachment by the
Exiled Tibetans began a unique global election yesterday for a government representing a homeland many have never seen, as part of a democratic exercise voters say carries great weight. From red-robed Buddhist monks in the snowy Himalayas, to political exiles in megacities across South Asia, to refugees in Australia, Europe and North America, voting takes place in 27 countries — but not China. “Elections ... show that the struggle for Tibet’s freedom and independence continues from generation to generation,” said candidate Gyaltsen Chokye, 33, who is based in the Indian hill-town of Dharamsala, headquarters of the government-in-exile, the Central Tibetan Administration (CTA). It
China executed 11 people linked to Myanmar criminal gangs, including “key members” of telecom scam operations, state media reported yesterday, as Beijing toughens its response to the sprawling, transnational industry. Fraud compounds where scammers lure Internet users into fake romantic relationships and cryptocurrency investments have flourished across Southeast Asia, including in Myanmar. Initially largely targeting Chinese speakers, the criminal groups behind the compounds have expanded operations into multiple languages to steal from victims around the world. Those conducting the scams are sometimes willing con artists, and other times trafficked foreign nationals forced to work. In the past few years, Beijing has stepped up cooperation
RSS