Britain’s newest reality TV show has been slammed as “insensitive,” “voyeuristic” and “nauseating” for recreating with six Britons the often fatal journeys made by thousands of refugees to the UK.
Bluntly titled Go Back to Where You Came From, the part-documentary, part-reality TV show by Channel 4 follows the group of six, who hold strong views both for and against immigration.
They are divided into two teams, with one dropped into war-ravaged Raqqa in Syria and the other sent to Mogadishu in Somalia. Over four episodes, which launched on Monday last week, they “experience some of the most perilous parts of the refugee journeys” according to Channel 4 — although they travel largely in armored vehicles.
Photo: AFP
The outspoken views of some participants, as well as the show’s format, have been criticized by viewers, charities and some media.
Amnesty International UK called it “deeply disappointing” and “sensational.”
Participant and chef Dave Marshall, 35, opened the series standing on the cliffs of Dover, calling for immigrants crossing the Channel to be “blown up.”
Moments later, political commentator Chloe Dobbs, 24, says that unless immigration is reined in “Britain will be a hellhole full of people wearing burqas.”
In the first episode, the six are taken to markets where they meet families, play soccer with kids and accompany them as they search through litter for scraps.
At one point, when they visit a bombed-out family home in Raqqa, Marshall and two other participants are invited to stay the night.
“Very kind of you for offering your house to us,” Marshall said.
“The series explores the varied and sometimes polarized opinions in our society in a fresh way,” a series spokesperson said.
In upcoming episodes, both groups undertake “challenges,” including a boat crossing and trekking through a Libyan desert.
The reality TV genre “exists and its success depends on actually performing shocking opinions,” said Myria Georgiou, media and communications professor at the London School of Economics.
“I’m sure the contestants are competing for that shock element — who is going to be more extreme in their opinions,” she said.
Dobbs defended it as a “really fun show that lots of people will tune into.”
“More so than just some bog-standard, boring documentary,” she said.
Go Back to Where You Came From is based on a popular Australian series which first ran in the early 2010s.
At around that time, politicians in Australia were campaigning to “stop the boats” of irregular migrants reaching the country.
A decade later, the same catchphrase has been seized upon by politicians opposing asylum seekers crossing the Channel to reach the UK.
The timing of the British version did not surprise Georgiou.
“You have the political leadership, nationally and globally, that have made the most outrageous opinions mainstream,” she said. “We can see that politics have become entertainment and thus it’s no surprise that entertainment has become politics.”
Some viewers have praised Channel 4 for giving a rare primetime spot to the hot-button immigration debate, with British charity Refugee Council “welcoming” the show’s premise.
“Television shows have huge potential to highlight the human stories behind the headlines,” Refugee Council CEO Enver Solomon said.
In one heavily criticized “challenge,” the group get into a dinghy in a simulation of the often fatal Channel crossings.
For Dobbs, who has previously said small boats were made out to be “fun” by some refugees, getting into a flimsy vessel in the middle of the night was a turning point.
“It was that moment for me that it really hit me. Gosh, people must be really desperate to get on these boats,” she said.
However, clips of the simulation sparked outrage across the Channel, with French lawmaker Xavier Bertrand calling for the “nauseating” show to be canceled.
“Hundreds of people have died in the Channel in recent years. This situation is a humanitarian tragedy, not the subject of a game,” Bertrand wrote on X.
India and Canada yesterday reached a string of agreements, including on critical mineral cooperation and a “landmark” uranium supply deal for nuclear power, the countries’ leaders said in New Delhi. The pacts, which also covered technology and promoting the use of renewable energy, were announced after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney hailed a fresh start in the relationship between their nations. “Our ties have seen a new energy, mutual trust and positivity,” Modi said. Carney’s visit is a key step forward in ties that effectively collapsed in 2023 after Ottawa accused New Delhi
Gaza is rapidly running out of its limited fuel supply and stocks of food staples might become tight, officials said, after Israel blocked the entry of fuel and goods into the war-shattered territory, citing fighting with Iran. The Israeli military closed all Gaza border crossings on Saturday after announcing airstrikes on Iran carried out jointly with the US. Israeli authorities late on Monday night said that they would reopen the Kerem Shalom crossing from Israel to Gaza yesterday, for “gradual entry of humanitarian aid” into the strip, without saying how much. Israeli authorities previously said the crossings could not be operated safely during
Counting was under way in Nepal yesterday, after a high-stakes parliamentary election to reshape the country’s leadership following protests last year that toppled the government. Key figures vying for power include former Nepalese prime minister K. P. Sharma Oli, rapper-turned-mayor Balendra Shah, who is bidding for the youth vote, and newly elected Nepali Congress party leader Gagan Thapa. In Kathmandu’s tea shops and city squares, people were glued to their phones, checking results as early trends flashed up — suggesting Shah’s centrist Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP) was ahead. Nepalese Election Commission spokesman Prakash Nyupane said the counting was ongoing “in a peaceful manner”
‘APARTHEID WALL’: Critics said the wall would not stop crime, and that it aimed to hide the poor and the fact that there is a privileged and privilege-deprived Cape Town Cape Town’s plans to build a wall to prevent attacks on the airport highway have divided South Africa’s tourist hotspot, with critics calling it an apartheid throwback to hide poverty. The nearly 9km wall would separate part of the road that leads in from the international airport from the packed, impoverished settlements that line the route. Attacks — some deadly — have been reported for years along the busy multi-lane route, including hijackings and smash-and-grab ambushes. “They’ll come with a stone and break the windscreen,” e-hailing driver Mustafa Hashim said, recounting stories of attacks on the corridor known as the “N2 hell
RSS