Millions of dollars have poured into bets on who will win the US presidential election after a last-minute court ruling opened up gambling on the vote, upping the stakes on a too-close-to-call race between US Vice President Kamala Harris and former US president Donald Trump that has already put voters on edge.
Contracts for a Harris victory were trading between 48 and 50 percent in favor of the Democrat on Friday on Interactive Brokers, a firm that has taken advantage of a legal opening created earlier this month in the country’s long running regulatory battle over election markets.
With just a month until the Nov. 5 vote, markets opened after a court in Washington ruled that Kalshi, a start-up that has been trying to introduce political betting in the US for years, could take wagers as legal appeals by regulators against the company continue. Within days, more than US$6.3 million had been put on the line for the Harris-Trump matchup alone, with users also betting on control of the US House of Representatives and US Senate.
Photo: AFP
It is the latest turn in a years-long saga between the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and firms wishing to offer election betting — a legal practice in a number of other countries and one that some Americans participate in outside of regulators’ oversight through offshore markets.
More than US$1.7 billion has been placed on the Harris-Trump matchup on one such offshore site, Polymarket, where Trump held a 54 to 45 advantage over Harris on Friday evening.
Those in favor of gambling — or “event contracts” in finance terms — say it is a legitimate way to hedge bets against adverse outcomes, likening it to futures contracts. Some also say that the markets are better than polls.
“These contracts are important,” said Steve Sanders, executive vice president of marketing and product development at Interactive Brokers. “They’re good for people to take a view on what they think is happening and hedge their portfolios.”
In just days, more than 1 million contracts had been traded on Interactive Brokers.
Only two election betting markets were legally operating in the US before the ruling on Wednesday last week, having been granted exemptions due to their affiliation with research projects and the strict limits they placed on the amount people could bet.
Critics worry about widespread election gambling in a polarized moment when basic facts are in dispute and disinformation on which people might base their wagers is abundant.
“I don’t want to be too dramatic, but we live in a country where tens of millions of Americans believe the last presidential election was stolen,” CFTC General Counsel Rob Schwartz said during recent arguments against Kalshi.
“Ensuring the integrity of elections and avoiding improper interference and misinformation are undoubtedly paramount public interests,” Judge Patricia Millett wrote in the decision that allowed bets to be placed while the appeals against Kalshi play out.
However, the CFTC had “given this court no concrete basis to conclude that event contracts would likely be a vehicle for such harms,” she added.
While the door on political betting might shut again on further appeal, any decision on that would likely come after Nov. 5, meaning markets would stay open through the election.
For Pratik Chougule, cofounder of the advocacy group Coalition for Political Forecasting, “it’s been a good year” so far for his own political wagers.
He said he is taking a look at opening an account with Interactive Brokers now that it is operating election contracts.
Judges on further appeals might be “a bit more skeptical,” but Chougule said that in the past few years the CFTC has warmed up to at least understanding the arguments in favor election markets, even if regulators do not endorse them.
Crowds in Bangladesh are flocking to snap photographs with an unlikely social media star — an albino buffalo with flowing blond hair nicknamed “Donald Trump” that is due to be sacrificed within days. Owner Zia Uddin Mridha, 38, said his brother named the 700kg bull over its flowing helmet of hair resembling the signature look of the US president. “My younger brother picked this name because of the buffalo’s extraordinary hair,” he said at his farm in Narayanganj, just outside the capital, Dhaka. Mridha said that a constant stream of curious visitors — social media fans, onlookers and children — have come throughout
It began as a satirical online project. Now millions of young people in India are flocking to it as an outlet for their frustration. A parody political party called the Cockroach Janta Party, with the insect as its symbol, has exploded across India’s social media by turning absurdist humor into protest. Memes and short videos mocking corruption, joblessness and political dysfunction have flooded social media sites, where millions of users are embracing the cockroach — known for its ability to survive harsh conditions — as a tongue-in-cheek symbol of endurance. The online movement’s rise has been unusually rapid. The Cockroach Janta Party (CJP)
HOTTER: While Indians are accustomed to summer heat, climate change has caused northwestern India to warm faster than other parts of the country, an academic said Roads and markets have emptied during afternoons and some farmers have switched to nighttime work to avoid scorching temperatures as a heat wave grips large parts of India. The India Meteorological Department forecast maximum temperatures for yesterday of about 45°C in the capital, New Delhi, where authorities have opened temporary “cooling zones” to help people cope. The weather department warned that conditions would likely persist across several northern regions in the coming days, with temperatures staying well above seasonal averages. Authorities urged people to stay indoors during the hottest hours and take precautions against heat-related illnesses. India declares a heat wave whenever maximum temperatures
BIGGER ROLE: Beijing has said it maintains an impartial stance on the war in Ukraine, but by training Russian troops, China is far more involved than previously known China’s armed forces secretly trained about 200 Russian military personnel in China late last year, and some have since returned to fight in Ukraine, according to three European intelligence agencies and documents seen by Reuters. While China and Russia have held a number of joint military exercises since Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Beijing has repeatedly said that it is neutral in the conflict and presents itself as a peace mediator. The covert training sessions, which predominantly focused on the use of drones, were outlined in a dual-language Russian-Chinese agreement signed by senior Russian and Chinese officers in Beijing on
RSS