For more than 40 years, a landmark agreement between the US and China has yielded cooperation across a range of scientific and technical fields, a powerful sign that the rivals could set aside their disputes and work together.
Now with bilateral relations in their worst state in decades, a debate is under way within the US government about whether to let the US-China Science and Technology Agreement (STA) expire later this year, three officials familiar with the discussions said.
With US Secretary of State Antony Blinken in Beijing on the first visit by a secretary of state in five years and expectations low for any bilateral breakthrough, the debate over the oldest US-China bilateral cooperation accord mirrors a bigger question dividing policymakers: do the benefits to the US of engaging with China outweigh the risk of empowering a competitor who might play by different rules?
Photo: AFP
The agreement, signed when Beijing and Washington established diplomatic ties in 1979 and renewed about every five years since, has been hailed as a stabilizing force for the countries’ relations, with collaboration in areas from atmospheric and agricultural science to basic research in physics and chemistry.
It laid the foundation for a boom in academic and commercial exchanges.
Those exchanges helped China grow into a technology and military powerhouse, but concerns about Beijing’s theft of US scientific and commercial achievements have prompted questions about whether the agreement — set to expire on Aug. 27 — should continue.
Proponents of renewing the STA argue that ending it would stifle academic and commercial cooperation.
While the dominant US view appears to be in favor of renewal, a growing contingent of officials and lawmakers believe cooperating on science and technology makes less sense given competition between the countries, said the officials, speaking on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the issue.
“Extending the Science and Technology Agreement between the US and China would only further jeopardize our research and intellectual property,” said US Representative Mike Gallagher.
The US Department of State declined to comment on “internal deliberations on negotiations.”
China’s embassy in Washington said that Chinese officials had approached the US a year ago to talk about the deal, which it said formed the basis for 40 years of “fruitful” cooperation.
“As far as we know, the US side is still conducting an internal review on the renewal of the agreement,” embassy spokesman Liu Pengyu (劉鵬宇) said, adding that both sides could adjust the original deal.
Inside the US government, including the State Department, there are competing views about whether to renew the pact, let it expire or renegotiate to add safeguards against industrial espionage and require reciprocity in data exchanges, the officials said.
Given the state of US-China ties, trying to renegotiate could derail the agreement, they said.
US businesses have long complained about Chinese government policies that require technology transfer, and experts warn about state-sponsored theft of everything from Monsanto crop seeds to data about NASA’s space shuttle designs.
“Technology will be the cutting-edge arena of global competition in the period ahead in the way nuclear missiles were the defining feature of the Cold War,” US National Security Council Indo-Pacific Coordinator Kurt Campbell told a forum this month, adding that the US “will not cede the high ground.”
Proponents of renewing the deal say that without it, the US would lose valuable insight into China’s technical advances.
“China friend or China foe, the US needs access to China to understand what’s happening on the ground,” said Denis Simon, a professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill who studies technology strategy in China, adding that it was important for the US to negotiate a fundamentally new agreement.
“The advocates for renewal are trying to keep this [issue] a little bit under the radar because they don’t want the China bashers to get a piece of this and try to rip it apart,” he said.
Anna Puglisi, a former US counterintelligence official focused on East Asia and now a senior fellow at Georgetown University’s Center for Security and Emerging Technology, said that science and technology cooperation had at one time been the “feel good” part of relations, but that has changed.
She said there are questions about what renewed cooperation could achieve at a time when China’s national security laws now cover the export of data and the country is taking steps to limit foreign access to its domestic academic databases.
“There has to be transparency and there has to be reciprocity,” Puglisi said. “And the US government needs to do a full accounting of what have we gotten out of this besides a couple of meetings.”
Australia has announced an agreement with the tiny Pacific nation Nauru enabling it to send hundreds of immigrants to the barren island. The deal affects more than 220 immigrants in Australia, including some convicted of serious crimes. Australian Minister of Home Affairs Tony Burke signed the memorandum of understanding on a visit to Nauru, the government said in a statement on Friday. “It contains undertakings for the proper treatment and long-term residence of people who have no legal right to stay in Australia, to be received in Nauru,” it said. “Australia will provide funding to underpin this arrangement and support Nauru’s long-term economic
ANGER: Unrest worsened after a taxi driver was killed by a police vehicle on Thursday, as protesters set alight government buildings across the nation Protests worsened overnight across major cities of Indonesia, far beyond the capital, Jakarta, as demonstrators defied Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto’s call for calm. The most serious unrest was seen in the eastern city of Makassar, while protests also unfolded in Bandung, Surabaya, Solo and Yogyakarta. By yesterday morning, crowds had dispersed in Jakarta. Troops patrolled the streets with tactical vehicles and helped civilians clear trash, although smoke was still rising in various protest sites. Three people died and five were injured in Makassar when protesters set fire to the regional parliament building during a plenary session on Friday evening, according to
‘NEO-NAZIS’: A minister described the rally as ‘spreading hate’ and ‘dividing our communities,’ adding that it had been organized and promoted by far-right groups Thousands of Australians joined anti-immigration rallies across the country yesterday that the center-left government condemned, saying they sought to spread hate and were linked to neo-Nazis. “March for Australia” rallies against immigration were held in Sydney, and other state capitals and regional centers, according to the group’s Web site. “Mass migration has torn at the bonds that held our communities together,” the Web site said. The group posted on X on Saturday that the rallies aimed to do “what the mainstream politicians never have the courage to do: demand an end to mass immigration.” The group also said it was concerned about culture,
CRACKDOWN: The Indonesian president vowed to clamp down on ‘treason and terrorism,’ while acceding to some protest demands to revoke lawmaker benefits Protests in Indonesia over rising living costs and inequality intensified overnight, prompting Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto to cancel a planned trip to China, while demonstrators reportedly targeted the homes of the finance minister and several lawmakers. Rioters entered Indonesian Minister of Finance Sri Mulyani Indrawati’s residence near Jakarta early yesterday, but were repelled by armed forces personnel, Kompas reported. Items were taken from the homes of lawmaker Ahmad Sahroni and two others, according to Detik.com. The reports of looting could not be independently verified, and the finance ministry has not responded to requests for comment. The protests were sparked by outrage over
RSS