British Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s plan to renege on part of the Brexit divorce deal passed its first hurdle in parliament late on Monday after a bruising debate in which senior members of his own party denounced the move.
The House of Commons passed the Internal Market Bill by 340 to 263 in its first main vote, allowing it to proceed it to the next stage in the parliamentary process yesterday.
Johnson said the proposed legislation, which would rewrite part of the Withdrawal Agreement, is “essential” to maintain the UK’s economic and political integrity.
Photo: AFP/ PRU
He accused the EU of making “absurd” threats to stop food moving from the British mainland to Northern Ireland.
“The EU hasn’t taken that particular revolver off the table,” Johnson told lawmakers. “It is such an extraordinary threat, and it seems so incredible the EU could do this, that we are not taking powers in this bill to neutralize that threat, but obviously reserve the right to do so if these threats persist.”
Johnson’s decision to rip up part of an international agreement he signed less than a year ago has already pitched the Brexit negotiations into turmoil.
The EU has threatened legal action and called on him to withdraw the bill by the end of the month. Pressing on risks jeopardizing efforts to secure a trade deal with the bloc before the Brexit transition period expires at the end of the year.
While the prime minister had a comfortable majority in Monday night’s vote, with only two Conservative lawmakers voting against him for now and others abstaining, there would be opportunities for further rebellions as the bill passes through the Commons.
Johnson would then face a bigger obstacle in the House of Lords, where Conservative grandees — including former leader Michael Howard — have denounced the legislation and could delay its progress.
Lawmakers on both sides of the House of Commons said the government’s admission that the proposed legislation would breach international law would weaken the UK’s place in the world and hobble its attempts to call other countries — including Russia, China and Zimbabwe — to account.
“Britain has been a beacon in some very difficult places of the world for support for the rule of law, and our support is relied upon,” former British secretary of state for international development Andrew Mitchell said.
“We have a duty to uphold the rule of law,” he said.
Former British attorneys general Geoffrey Cox and Jeremy Wright said that they would not back a bill that breaks international law, and were joined by former chancellor of the exchequer Sajid Javid.
Rehman Chishti, Johnson’s special envoy for freedom of religion or belief, quit earlier in the day, saying he could not vote for the plan.
“I understand how some people will feel unease over the use of these powers, and I share that sentiment myself and I have absolutely no desire to use these measures,” Johnson said.
“They are an insurance policy, and if we reach agreement with our European friends — which I still believe is possible — they will never be invoked,” he said.
Conservative rebels did offer the prime minister a potential way out with a proposed amendment — which was not put to a vote on Monday — that would require the government to hold a further vote in the House of Commons before it could change the terms of the Withdrawal Agreement.
For their part, opposition lawmakers lined up to accuse Johnson of failing to deliver on his promise at the general election in December last year that his deal was “oven ready.”
They also said he had failed to live up to his claims that he had provided protection against the exact issues on the Irish border he is now seeking to repair.
“It’s his deal, his mess, his failure,” Labour Party spokesman Ed Miliband told the Commons. “This is the wrong thing to do, it’s not necessary and it’s deeply damaging for the country.”
‘SHORTSIGHTED’: Using aid as leverage is punitive, would not be regarded well among Pacific Island nations and would further open the door for China, an academic said New Zealand has suspended millions of dollars in budget funding to the Cook Islands, it said yesterday, as the relationship between the two constitutionally linked countries continues to deteriorate amid the island group’s deepening ties with China. A spokesperson for New Zealand Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters said in a statement that New Zealand early this month decided to suspend payment of NZ$18.2 million (US$11 million) in core sector support funding for this year and next year as it “relies on a high trust bilateral relationship.” New Zealand and Australia have become increasingly cautious about China’s growing presence in the Pacific
Indonesia’s Mount Lewotobi Laki-Laki yesterday erupted again with giant ash and smoke plumes after forcing evacuations of villages and flight cancelations, including to and from the resort island of Bali. Several eruptions sent ash up to 5km into the sky on Tuesday evening to yesterday afternoon. An eruption on Tuesday afternoon sent thick, gray clouds 10km into the sky that expanded into a mushroom-shaped ash cloud visible as much as 150km kilometers away. The eruption alert was raised on Tuesday to the highest level and the danger zone where people are recommended to leave was expanded to 8km from the crater. Officers also
The team behind the long-awaited Vera Rubin Observatory in Chile yesterday published their first images, revealing breathtaking views of star-forming regions as well as distant galaxies. More than two decades in the making, the giant US-funded telescope sits perched at the summit of Cerro Pachon in central Chile, where dark skies and dry air provide ideal conditions for observing the cosmos. One of the debut images is a composite of 678 exposures taken over just seven hours, capturing the Trifid Nebula and the Lagoon Nebula — both several thousand light-years from Earth — glowing in vivid pinks against orange-red backdrops. The new image
ESPIONAGE: The British government’s decision on the proposed embassy hinges on the security of underground data cables, a former diplomat has said A US intervention over China’s proposed new embassy in London has thrown a potential resolution “up in the air,” campaigners have said, amid concerns over the site’s proximity to a sensitive hub of critical communication cables. The furor over a new “super-embassy” on the edge of London’s financial district was reignited last week when the White House said it was “deeply concerned” over potential Chinese access to “the sensitive communications of one of our closest allies.” The Dutch parliament has also raised concerns about Beijing’s ideal location of Royal Mint Court, on the edge of the City of London, which has so
RSS