Over the four years that Ukraine has been fighting to repel Russian forces from its territory, its country’s battlefields have become scarred by airstrikes, pockmarked by artillery fire and littered with the wreckage of cheap aerial drones.
The conflict has transformed the economics of modern warfare — with both sides now reliant on uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) to monitor the battlefield, evade defenses and strike deep into enemy territory.
The fighting has so far kept Russia bogged down, trapped behind frozen frontlines, allowing Kyiv to remake the country’s industrial base to meet the needs of the war.
Photo: EPA
Now Ukraine has a new target — to free its drone supply chains of components from China, even as it attempts to ramp up production to meet its army’s growing needs.
Despite repeated denials from Beijing, Ukraine accuses China of aiding its ally Russia with military goods.
Amid broader concerns about China’s dominance of industrial supply chains and the security risks that could entail, Ukraine — as well as Europe, the US and other countries — have increasingly turned to Taiwan as an alternative supplier.
Taiwan’s reputation for excellence in technology and particular expertise in microelectronics, navigation systems and batteries — areas in which Western suppliers have struggled to compete — make it a favored alternative source for Ukrainian drone manufacturers, said the Snake Island Institute (SII), an independent Ukrainian think tank.
Taiwan appears ready to meet the moment — with President William Lai (賴清德) promoting a NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.68 billion) supplementary defense budget that includes funding for drones and the integration of artificial intelligence (AI).
Taiwanese drone exports to Europe last year surged more than 40-fold annually, with Poland and the Czech Republic among the largest markets, data from the Taipei-based Research Institute for Democracy, Society and Emerging Technology (DSET) showed.
The trend continues to grow — exports in the first quarter have already surpassed last year’s total.
Most of the drones were intended for onward transfer to Ukraine, according to interviews conducted by DSET, with the purchasing countries acting as intermediaries.
“We have components that are made in Taiwan and that is not unusual in the industry now,” said Bohdan Diorditsa, chief international alliances officer at Vyriy, one of Ukraine’s leading drone makers that has been vocal in pushing for local production and reducing reliance on Chinese components that still dominate global supply chains.
Diorditsa said he fears that China might further tighten export controls were behind the search for alternatives.
Taiwan, with world-class capabilities in semiconductors and electronics integration, is “100 percent a valuable partner,” he said.
Ultimately, localization remains Ukraine’s primary focus, said Artur Savchii, an analyst at SII.
Each year of the war has pushed production further inward: from mainly importing Chinese finished drones to assembling them almost entirely domestically.
By last year, Ukraine had more than 100 manufacturers of components on its shores, the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense said.
Ukrainian companies are also tailoring systems specifically for frontline combat in ways that mass-market Chinese suppliers often cannot, Savchii said.
However, even as domestic assembly expands, Ukraine is unlikely to scale up drone production without any Chinese components in the near term, largely because Chinese-made parts remain significantly cheaper and more widely available. Even components produced elsewhere, including lithium batteries and rare earth magnets, often still rely on Chinese materials.
Taiwan is also hardly free from the same dependency problem. China is its biggest source of drone imports, although the customs figures include civilian and commercial models rather than solely military systems.
Taipei has pledged to build a fully “non-red” drone industry by next year and wants to produce one-third of the rare earth magnets it needs by 2030.
However, those transitions are a work in progress.
The scale of what Taiwan can offer remains a limitation as well. Ukraine’s wartime needs are vast, with demand measured in millions of drones a year.
Taiwan’s output is far smaller, still in the hundreds of thousands, Customs Administration data showed.
Chinese products also have a clear advantage in price, with some models costing only a fraction of their Taiwanese equivalents, said Gene Su (蘇聖傑), general manager of Thunder Tiger, one of Taiwan’s biggest drone makers.
Su’s company has sent drone systems to Ukraine for field testing.
“They test it, they like it, but they don’t buy it because it’s still too expensive,” he said.
Geopolitics is another obstacle. Ukraine does not formally recognize Taiwan and has official diplomatic ties with China, its largest trading partner. As a result, much of the cooperation appears to flow indirectly through intermediaries in Poland, the Czech Republic and the US.
There is little sign of formal government-level coordination, with most of the engagement taking place business-to-business.
Taiwanese companies are nimble, though. Some drone companies have established local facilities in Lithuania and Poland to better serve Ukraine, while a government body to promote the industry has signed memoranda of understanding with five European countries.
As demand for AI-driven drones grows on the front line, experts and suppliers see potential for deeper Taiwan-Ukraine cooperation.
The Ministry of Economic Affairs has pledged to support seven high-tech companies with about NT$326 million to develop drone-specific chips.
For Ukrainian manufacturers such as Vyriy, the decision of where to source components comes down to wherever is best for the military. It is a combination of strategic thinking about supplier countries and considerations of efficiency.
“We build weapons not under market pressure or energy pressure,” Diorditsa said. “We’re under pressure to survive.”
The first of 10 new high-capacity trains purchased from South Korea’s Hyundai Rotem arrived at the Port of Taipei yesterday to meet the demands of an expanding metro network, Taipei Rapid Transit Corp (TRTC) said yesterday. The train completed a three-day, 1,200km voyage from the Port of Masan in South Korea, the company said. Costing NT$590 million (US$18.79 million) each, the new six-carriage trains feature a redesigned interior based on "human-centric" transportation concepts, TRTC said. The design utilizes continuous longitudinal seating to widen the aisles and optimize passenger flow, while also upgrading passenger information displays and driving control systems for a more comfortable
AGING: While Japan has 22 submarines, Taiwan only operates four, two of which were commissioned by the US in 1945 and 1946, and transferred to Taiwan in 1973 Taiwan would need at least 12 submarines to reach modern fleet capabilities, CSBC Corp, Taiwan chairman Chen Cheng-hung (陳政宏) said in an interview broadcast on Friday, citing a US assessment. CSBC is testing the nation’s first indigenous defense submarine, the Hai Kun (海鯤, Narwhal), which is scheduled to be delivered to the navy next month or in July. The Hai Kun has completed torpedo-firing tests and is scheduled to undergo overnight sea trials, Chen said on an SET TV military affairs program. Taiwan would require at least 12 submarines to establish a modern submarine force after assessing the nation’s operational environment and defense
A white king snake that frightened passengers and caused a stir on a Taipei MRT train on Friday evening has been claimed by its owner, who would be fined, Taipei Rapid Transit Corp (TRTC) said yesterday. A person on Threads posted that he thought he was lucky to find an empty row of seats on Friday after boarding a train on the Bannan (Blue) Line, only to spot a white snake with black stripes after sitting down. Startled, he jumped up, he wrote, describing the encounter as “terrifying.” “Taipei’s rat control plan: Release snakes on the metro,” one person wrote in reply, referring
Taiwan’s two cases of hantavirus so far this year are on par with previous years’ case numbers, and the government is coordinating rat extermination work, so there should not be any outbreaks, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Director-General Philip Lo (羅一鈞) said today in an interview with the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper). An increase in rat sightings in Taipei and New Taipei City has raised concerns about the spread of hantavirus, as rats can carry the disease. In January, a man in his 70s who lived in Taipei’s Daan District (大安) tested positive posthumously for hantavirus, Taiwan’s
RSS