Over the four years that Ukraine has been fighting to repel Russian forces from its territory, its country’s battlefields have become scarred by airstrikes, pockmarked by artillery fire and littered with the wreckage of cheap aerial drones.
The conflict has transformed the economics of modern warfare — with both sides now reliant on uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) to monitor the battlefield, evade defenses and strike deep into enemy territory.
The fighting has so far kept Russia bogged down, trapped behind frozen frontlines, allowing Kyiv to remake the country’s industrial base to meet the needs of the war.
Photo: EPA
Now Ukraine has a new target — to free its drone supply chains of components from China, even as it attempts to ramp up production to meet its army’s growing needs.
Despite repeated denials from Beijing, Ukraine accuses China of aiding its ally Russia with military goods.
Amid broader concerns about China’s dominance of industrial supply chains and the security risks that could entail, Ukraine — as well as Europe, the US and other countries — have increasingly turned to Taiwan as an alternative supplier.
Taiwan’s reputation for excellence in technology and particular expertise in microelectronics, navigation systems and batteries — areas in which Western suppliers have struggled to compete — make it a favored alternative source for Ukrainian drone manufacturers, said the Snake Island Institute (SII), an independent Ukrainian think tank.
Taiwan appears ready to meet the moment — with President William Lai (賴清德) promoting a NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.68 billion) supplementary defense budget that includes funding for drones and the integration of artificial intelligence (AI).
Taiwanese drone exports to Europe last year surged more than 40-fold annually, with Poland and the Czech Republic among the largest markets, data from the Taipei-based Research Institute for Democracy, Society and Emerging Technology (DSET) showed.
The trend continues to grow — exports in the first quarter have already surpassed last year’s total.
Most of the drones were intended for onward transfer to Ukraine, according to interviews conducted by DSET, with the purchasing countries acting as intermediaries.
“We have components that are made in Taiwan and that is not unusual in the industry now,” said Bohdan Diorditsa, chief international alliances officer at Vyriy, one of Ukraine’s leading drone makers that has been vocal in pushing for local production and reducing reliance on Chinese components that still dominate global supply chains.
Diorditsa said he fears that China might further tighten export controls were behind the search for alternatives.
Taiwan, with world-class capabilities in semiconductors and electronics integration, is “100 percent a valuable partner,” he said.
Ultimately, localization remains Ukraine’s primary focus, said Artur Savchii, an analyst at SII.
Each year of the war has pushed production further inward: from mainly importing Chinese finished drones to assembling them almost entirely domestically.
By last year, Ukraine had more than 100 manufacturers of components on its shores, the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense said.
Ukrainian companies are also tailoring systems specifically for frontline combat in ways that mass-market Chinese suppliers often cannot, Savchii said.
However, even as domestic assembly expands, Ukraine is unlikely to scale up drone production without any Chinese components in the near term, largely because Chinese-made parts remain significantly cheaper and more widely available. Even components produced elsewhere, including lithium batteries and rare earth magnets, often still rely on Chinese materials.
Taiwan is also hardly free from the same dependency problem. China is its biggest source of drone imports, although the customs figures include civilian and commercial models rather than solely military systems.
Taipei has pledged to build a fully “non-red” drone industry by next year and wants to produce one-third of the rare earth magnets it needs by 2030.
However, those transitions are a work in progress.
The scale of what Taiwan can offer remains a limitation as well. Ukraine’s wartime needs are vast, with demand measured in millions of drones a year.
Taiwan’s output is far smaller, still in the hundreds of thousands, Customs Administration data showed.
Chinese products also have a clear advantage in price, with some models costing only a fraction of their Taiwanese equivalents, said Gene Su (蘇聖傑), general manager of Thunder Tiger, one of Taiwan’s biggest drone makers.
Su’s company has sent drone systems to Ukraine for field testing.
“They test it, they like it, but they don’t buy it because it’s still too expensive,” he said.
Geopolitics is another obstacle. Ukraine does not formally recognize Taiwan and has official diplomatic ties with China, its largest trading partner. As a result, much of the cooperation appears to flow indirectly through intermediaries in Poland, the Czech Republic and the US.
There is little sign of formal government-level coordination, with most of the engagement taking place business-to-business.
Taiwanese companies are nimble, though. Some drone companies have established local facilities in Lithuania and Poland to better serve Ukraine, while a government body to promote the industry has signed memoranda of understanding with five European countries.
As demand for AI-driven drones grows on the front line, experts and suppliers see potential for deeper Taiwan-Ukraine cooperation.
The Ministry of Economic Affairs has pledged to support seven high-tech companies with about NT$326 million to develop drone-specific chips.
For Ukrainian manufacturers such as Vyriy, the decision of where to source components comes down to wherever is best for the military. It is a combination of strategic thinking about supplier countries and considerations of efficiency.
“We build weapons not under market pressure or energy pressure,” Diorditsa said. “We’re under pressure to survive.”
EXCUSES: Beijing is using government and research vessels as a pretext to harass the nation and enter its EEZ, and engage in ‘hegemonic expansion,’ the coast guard said The Coast Guard Administration yesterday said it drove away Chinese oceanographic research vessel Xiang Yang Hong 22 (向陽紅33) from restricted waters after warning it that it was in Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ). The Chinese vessel entered restricted waters off the coast of Yilan County’s Suao (蘇澳) at 11:35pm on Thursday, the coast guard said, adding that it dispatched the Lanyu patrol vessel and the boat PP-10077 to shadow the Chinese ship and issue radio warnings ordering it to leave. China has no sovereignty over waters off Taiwan’s east coast, Lanyu’s crew told Xiang Yang Hong 22 over the radio, and demanded
BAIT AND SWITCH: Allowing KMT-run counties to sell to China while the threat of abrupt cancelations hangs overhead is another form of coercion, officials said Beijing is using agricultural purchase offers announced during the Straits Forum to deepen Taiwan’s dependence on the Chinese market, a Taiwanese official said yesterday as they criticized the Taitung County commissioner’s participation in the initiative. During the Straits Forum held in Xiamen on Saturday, Chinese officials announced a sales and purchase agreement for agricultural products from some counties led by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Taitung County Commissioner Yao Ching-ling (饒慶鈴), who was barred from attending the event in person by the Mainland Affairs Council, participated via video. Under the agreement, China would purchase atemoyas, pomeloes, tea and grouper harvested in Taitung,
Tropical Storm Mekkhala is forecast to strengthen into a typhoon tomorrow and could come close enough to Taiwan later in the week to prompt a sea warning, the Central Weather Administration (CWA) said yesterday. As of 2 pm, the storm was located 1,870 kilometers southeast of Taiwan's southern tip and moving west- northwest at 23 km per hour. CWA forecaster Cheng Chieh-jen (鄭傑仁) said Mekkhala is expected to continue moving west-northwest through Tuesday under the influence of the Pacific high- pressure system before gradually turning north toward waters east of Taiwan or south of the Ryukyu Islands. The timing and angle of the
Four Taiwanese universities have been ranked among the world's top 200 institutions in the Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) World University Rankings for next year, the highest Taiwan has ever placed in the category, with National Taiwan University (NTU) achieving its best performance at 54th globally and 17th in Asia. The four Taiwanese institutions in the global top 200 are NTU (54th), National Tsing Hua University (142nd), National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (177th) and National Cheng Kung University (191st), the rankings showed. All four universities achieved their highest-ever global rankings this year, QS data showed. National Cheng Kung University entered the top 200 for