A proposed amendment to the National Security Act (國家安全法) that would impose penalties on people advocating for China to take over Taiwan by force has drawn mixed reactions from security experts, with some urging the government to regulate only mobilization propaganda directly inciting the hostile regime to invade Taiwan through military action.
The amendment to Article 4 of the act proposed by the Executive Yuan prohibits anyone from advocating or supporting foreign countries, China, Hong Kong, Macau or other hostile regimes in launching wars against Taiwan or terminating Taiwan’s sovereignty using non-peaceful means.
Those who breach the regulations would face a fine of NT$100,000 to NT$1 million (US$3,129.6 to NT$31,296).
Photo: CNA
At a hearing hosted by legislature yesterday, Wang Chih-sheng (王智盛), an assistant professor at the Central Police University’s Border Police Department, said that the key question is how to draw the line between political commentaries on cross-strait matters and statements threatening national security, while ensuring that people expressing their political opinions are not mistakenly penalized.
The Executive Yuan’s proposal uses very vague terms, Wang said.
“It should specifically ban mobilization rhetoric inciting hostile regimes to invade Taiwan by force and explicitly state that policy discussions, debates over Taiwanese independence or unification with China and academic analyses are excluded,” Wang said.
The government should also aim to prevent people from being exposed to foreign infiltration forces, he added.
“People are contacted by these [hostile] forces through the Internet, pledge allegiance to them and get assigned tasks [on infiltration]. If we always tackle the problems only after the damage is done, we would never find the organizations planning and operating the infiltration work in the first place,” Wang said, adding that cutting off contact with the infiltration force is key.
Current national security laws make it difficult to convict offenders as they require a clear intent to harm national security or social stability, he said.
The proposed amendment would consider an act unlawful if it is deemed on its own to be capable of causing harm, without requiring proof that actual harm occurred.
National Chengchi University law professor Yang Yun-hua (楊雲驊) said that military personnel, teachers and civil servants found guilty of national security offenses should receive no pension.
“It is still way too generous that they get 50 percent of their pension after being convicted. The government should not use taxpayers’ money to take care of them when they retire, while they use this money to threaten national security,” Yang said.
Liao Yi-ming (廖義銘), a professor at National Kaohsiung University’s Department of Political Science and Law, said in an interview after the hearing that the draft amendment’s broad clause — acts “sufficient to harm national security or social stability”— amounts to a “blank check,” effectively granting unlimited discretion to administrative and law enforcement agencies such as the Mainland Affairs Council and the Ministry of the Interior.
The most serious issue is that the amendment does not require authorities to prove that the person acted with malice, he said, adding that a unilateral determination that the act is “potentially harmful” is enough to convict the person.
Such legal concepts, lacking objective standards of evidence, risk enabling arbitrary expansion of administrative power, Liao said.
China has reserved offshore airspace in the Yellow Sea and East China Sea from March 27 to May 6, issuing alerts usually used to warn of military exercises, although no such exercises have been announced, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported yesterday. Reserving such a large area for 40 days without explanation is an “unusual step,” as military exercises normally only last a few days, the paper said. These alerts, known as Notice to Air Missions (Notams), “are intended to inform pilots and aviation authorities of temporary airspace hazards or restrictions,” the article said. The airspace reserved in the alert is
NAMING SPAT: The foreign ministry called on Denmark to propose an acceptable solution to the erroneous nationality used for Taiwanese on residence permits Taiwan has revoked some privileges for Danish diplomatic staff over a Danish permit that lists “Taiwan” as “China,” Eric Huang (黃鈞耀), head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ Department of European Affairs, told a news conference in Taipei yesterday. Reporters asked Huang whether the Danish government had responded to the ministry’s request that it correct the nationality on Danish residence permits of Taiwanese, which has been listed as “China” since 2024. Taiwan’s representative office in Denmark continues to communicate with the Danish government, and the ministry has revoked some privileges previously granted to Danish representatives in Taiwan and would continue to review
The first bluefin tuna of the season, brought to shore in Pingtung County and weighing 190kg, was yesterday auctioned for NT$10,600 (US$333.5) per kilogram, setting a record high for the local market. The auction was held at the fish market in Donggang Fishing Harbor, where the Siaoliouciou Island-registered fishing vessel Fu Yu Ching No. 2 delivered the “Pingtung First Tuna” it had caught for bidding. Bidding was intense, and the tuna was ultimately jointly purchased by a local restaurant and a local company for NT$10,600 per kilogram — NT$300 ,more than last year — for a total of NT$2.014 million. The 67-year-old skipper
China has reserved offshore airspace over the Yellow Sea and East China Sea from March 27 to May 6, issuing alerts that are usually used to warn of military exercises, although no such exercises have been announced, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported on Sunday. Reserving such a large area for 40 days without explanation is an “unusual step,” as military exercises normally only last a few days, the paper said. The alerts, known as notice to air missions (NOTAMs), “are intended to inform pilots and aviation authorities of temporary airspace hazards or restrictions,” the article said. The airspace reserved in the alert