Beijing’s new cross-strait tourism policy of allowing residents in Shanghai and its Fujian Province to visit Taiwan would not help the Tourism Administration reach its goal of attracting 10 million international tourists this year, cross-strait experts said.
China unilaterally announced the policy on Jan. 17 after President William Lai (賴清德) in his New Year’s address said that cross-strait tourism could resume through negotiations between Taiwan’s semi-official Taiwan Strait Tourism Association (TSTA) and China’s Association for Tourism Exchange Across the Taiwan Straits (ATETS).
The Mainland Affairs Council late last month said that TSTA would soon contact the ATETS to discuss issues that might arise in the implementation of the policy, such as verifying the lists of Chinese travel agencies organizing tours to Taiwan and Taiwanese travel agencies hosting Chinese tourists.
Photo: David Chang, EPA-EFE
Tourism Administration director-general Chou Yung-hui (周永暉) told the Taipei Times that the purpose would be to “discuss how to maintain the safety and quality of tours when Chinese tourists travel in Taiwan, particularly related to problems caused by low-priced shopping tours.”
Negotiations could begin after the Lunar New Year holiday, he added.
Beijing’s decision to partially resume cross-strait tourism after suspending it for six years is an interim response to the changes in its relations with the US and Taiwan, said Chang Wu-ueh (張五岳), professor of diplomacy and international relations at Tamkang University.
That Beijing lifted the travel ban to Taiwan for residents in Shanghai and its Fujan Province three days before the inauguration of US President Donald Trump, who has made countering China’s global influence one of his major political agenda, is to show Washington that it is willing to communicate with Taiwan and adopt a milder approach in addressing cross-strait issues.
Beijing did not react much to Lai’s New Year’s address because it neither provoked hostility nor hinted at a drastic change to his approach to cross-strait relations, Chang said.
At the Taipei-Shanghai Twin City Forum in December last year, Shanghai Deputy Mayor Hua Yuan (華源) said that Taiwanese should visit Shanghai more often and pledged to promote group tours to the city’s residents.
Hua would not have had the confidence of making such a remark if he did not have authorization from Beijing, he said.
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) pledged to boost cross-strait tourism during their meeting in April last year. That was the only item on their agenda that can be realistically implemented, and such a policy must be realized ahead of another expected Ma-Xi meeting this year, which would be held to celebrate the 10th anniversary of their first meeting in 2015, he said.
While most Chinese tourists would likely prefer to travel to Taiwan independently, Beijing at this point would probably only allow group tours, as it can control the number of tourists and their itineraries, Chang said.
However, early results of the policy shift could determine whether residents from other Chinese cities or provinces would be allowed to visit Taiwan, he said.
“Aside from the new cross-strait tourism policy, Beijing also called for Taiwan to drop its group tour ban and downgrade its travel alert for China,” he said.
If both sides are committed to resolving these issues in meetings of the two associations, it would facilitate visits of Chinese tourists from other places in China,” he said, adding that it is not an insurmountable obstacle.
However, people should not expect cross-strait tourism to return to the levels they were at before 2015, when Taiwan received about 4 million annual Chinese tourists, Chang said.
Beijing could always escalate its pressure on Taiwan if Washington dispatches national security officials of higher ranks to Taiwan, or Taiwanese officials meet with US national security officials, he said.
The types of weapons that Washington sells to Taipei, as well as how Lai is hosted when transiting in the US to visit allies in Central and South America, could become factors that produce a policy shift in Beijing, he added.
As of November last year, about 377,499 Chinese tourists visited Taiwan via a third country, while 2.54 million Taiwanese visited China.
Allowing Chinese residing in Shanghai and its Fujian Province to visit Taiwan would probably add about 400,000 international tourists to Taiwan, said Huang Cheng-tsung (黃正聰), associate professor at Providence University’s Department of Tourism.
International tourists from other countries would have to increase for the Tourism Administration to meet its goal of having 10 million international visitors this year, he said.
Unlike during Ma’s administration, when Chinese tourists were a driving force of the global travel market, Chinese are now encouraged to travel domestically, and their spending power has also significantly declined over the past few years due to weaker economic growth, he added.
Taiwan is unlikely to immediately lift the group tour ban and downgrade the travel alert to China following Beijing’s announcement, he said.
Chinese travel agents would have to first travel to Taiwan to scout for potential tour arrangements, and the government would also have to wait and see if China has implemented the policy shift to allow group tours to visit Taiwan, he said.
The travel alert is issued because the government has the responsibility to inform the public about the risks of traveling to China following its promulgation of the 22-point set of “guidelines” to penalize so-called “die-hard” Taiwanese independence separatists, Huang said.
“It is better that we wait about three months after China implements the policy before considering lifting the group tour ban and lowering the travel alert,” he said.
High Quality of Travel Association chairman Ringo Lee (李奇嶽) said resuming negotiations over tourism issues through the two associations would be a welcoming development, as the mechanism had helped to create a safe and regulated cross-strait tourism market.
“Not only would the mechanism help boost the tourism operators’ confidence in the market, but it would prevent cross-strait tourism from being affected by political factors. It is the best way forward when both cannot communicate on the basis of the so-called ‘1992 consensus.’”
However, Lee said that tourism operators should be aware about the need to bolster their ability to manage the potential risks from entering the cross-strait tourism market as it could easily be disrupted by political changes.
Beijing in August 2019 suspended individual travel for residents of 47 Chinese cities. It banned overseas group tourism in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Taipei toward the end of 2023 announced that groups tours to China would be allowed beginning in March last year. However, in February last year, it announced that the policy would be suspended beginning in June due to a lack of a reciprocal response from Beijing and its unilateral changes to the M503 flight route, which Taipei said would threaten flight safety.
Beijing in August last year announced that it has lifted restrictions on group and independent travel to Lienchiang County from China’s Fujian Province. The following month it announced that they would be allowed to travel to Kinmen County as well.
The “1992 consensus” refers to a tacit understanding between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party that both sides of the Strait acknowledge there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫), spokeswoman Yang Chih-yu (楊智伃) and Legislator Hsieh Lung-chieh (謝龍介) would be summoned by police for questioning for leading an illegal assembly on Thursday evening last week, Minister of the Interior Liu Shyh-fang (劉世芳) said today. The three KMT officials led an assembly outside the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office, a restricted area where public assembly is not allowed, protesting the questioning of several KMT staff and searches of KMT headquarters and offices in a recall petition forgery case. Chu, Yang and Hsieh are all suspected of contravening the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法) by holding
PRAISE: Japanese visitor Takashi Kubota said the Taiwanese temple architecture images showcased in the AI Art Gallery were the most impressive displays he saw Taiwan does not have an official pavilion at the World Expo in Osaka, Japan, because of its diplomatic predicament, but the government-backed Tech World pavilion is drawing interest with its unique recreations of works by Taiwanese artists. The pavilion features an artificial intelligence (AI)-based art gallery showcasing works of famous Taiwanese artists from the Japanese colonial period using innovative technologies. Among its main simulated displays are Eastern gouache paintings by Chen Chin (陳進), Lin Yu-shan (林玉山) and Kuo Hsueh-hu (郭雪湖), who were the three young Taiwanese painters selected for the East Asian Painting exhibition in 1927. Gouache is a water-based
Taiwan would welcome the return of Honduras as a diplomatic ally if its next president decides to make such a move, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) said yesterday. “Of course, we would welcome Honduras if they want to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan after their elections,” Lin said at a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee, when asked to comment on statements made by two of the three Honduran presidential candidates during the presidential campaign in the Central American country. Taiwan is paying close attention to the region as a whole in the wake of a
OFF-TARGET: More than 30,000 participants were expected to take part in the Games next month, but only 6,550 foreign and 19,400 Taiwanese athletes have registered Taipei city councilors yesterday blasted the organizers of next month’s World Masters Games over sudden timetable and venue changes, which they said have caused thousands of participants to back out of the international sporting event, among other organizational issues. They also cited visa delays and political interference by China as reasons many foreign athletes are requesting refunds for the event, to be held from May 17 to 30. Jointly organized by the Taipei and New Taipei City governments, the games have been rocked by numerous controversies since preparations began in 2020. Taipei City Councilor Lin Yen-feng (林延鳳) said yesterday that new measures by