Legal academics have called on the Constitutional Court to exercise restraint when reviewing a case about the constitutionality of amendments to government oversight laws passed by the Legislature at the end of May.
At a discussion on Friday co-hosted by the Republic of China Constitutional Law Society, attorney and Soochow University law professor Nigel Li (李念祖) said the legislature should be allowed sufficient latitude in crafting legislation.
A judicial ruling shackling the legislative body’s operations risks undermining the democratic system, Li said.
Photo: CNA
He was referring to the case brought by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus, the Cabinet, President William Lai (賴清德) and the Control Yuan in a bid to reject oversight laws that took effect on June 26.
The Constitutional Court has already issued an injunction that halted enforcement of some of the revisions, including those that would have given legislators much broader investigative powers.
The amendments to the Act Governing the Legislative Yuan’s Power (立法院職權行使法) and the Criminal Code were pushed through by opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party lawmakers, who together form a majority in the legislature.
The DPP-affiliated petitioners maintained that the deliberation that led up to the laws’ passage were unconstitutional, arguing that there was a lack of substantive discussions and that ruling party lawmakers were deprived of opportunities to express their views.
The petitioners also sought to challenge the constitutionality of many of the adopted measures, including those expanding the legislature’s investigative powers and requiring the president to address the legislature periodically and answer questions.
However, Li cited the court’s previous rulings, saying the court had in the past shown great respect for the “principle of legislative autonomy” provided that the legislative process did not contain “manifest and gross procedural flaws.”
The Constitutional Court, when trying to arbitrate constitutional disputes between top government agencies, as in the oversight law case, should refrain from assuming a “too active” role, he said.
Instead, the Constitutional Court should adopt a “minimalist” approach, he said, suggesting that the court render a ruling limited to the specific issues of the case and avoid setting broad precedents.
Political science professor Su Tzu-chiao (蘇子喬) and law professor Yang Chih-chieh (楊智傑) expressed similar views, saying the court should refrain from excessive intervention in the ongoing disputes between the opposition-led legislature and the petitioning agencies.
Su, also from Soochow University, said the new measures requiring the president’s presence at the legislature to deliver an annual state of the nation address and then answer questions would not undermine the constitutional system.
Rather, they would provide an opportunity to “clarify” the confusion in the division of responsibilities between the president and the premier, he said.
However, Lai has maintained that according to the Constitution, the president is not accountable to the Legislative Yuan and that the head of state can volunteer, but has no obligation, to address the legislature.
Friday’s discussion was cohosted by the National Policy Foundation — a think tank affiliated with the KMT — and the Taiwan Administrative Law Association.
Taiwanese can file complaints with the Tourism Administration to report travel agencies if their activities caused termination of a person’s citizenship, Mainland Affairs Council Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said yesterday, after a podcaster highlighted a case in which a person’s citizenship was canceled for receiving a single-use Chinese passport to enter Russia. The council is aware of incidents in which people who signed up through Chinese travel agencies for tours of Russia were told they could obtain Russian visas and fast-track border clearance, Chiu told reporters on the sidelines of an event in Taipei. However, the travel agencies actually applied
Japanese footwear brand Onitsuka Tiger today issued a public apology and said it has suspended an employee amid allegations that the staff member discriminated against a Vietnamese customer at its Taipei 101 store. Posting on the social media platform Threads yesterday, a user said that an employee at the store said that “those shoes are very expensive” when her friend, who is a migrant worker from Vietnam, asked for assistance. The employee then ignored her until she asked again, to which she replied: "We don't have a size 37." The post had amassed nearly 26,000 likes and 916 comments as of this
New measures aimed at making Taiwan more attractive to foreign professionals came into effect this month, the National Development Council said yesterday. Among the changes, international students at Taiwanese universities would be able to work in Taiwan without a work permit in the two years after they graduate, explainer materials provided by the council said. In addition, foreign nationals who graduated from one of the world’s top 200 universities within the past five years can also apply for a two-year open work permit. Previously, those graduates would have needed to apply for a work permit using point-based criteria or have a Taiwanese company
The Shilin District Prosecutors’ Office yesterday indicted two Taiwanese and issued a wanted notice for Pete Liu (劉作虎), founder of Shenzhen-based smartphone manufacturer OnePlus Technology Co (萬普拉斯科技), for allegedly contravening the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例) by poaching 70 engineers in Taiwan. Liu allegedly traveled to Taiwan at the end of 2014 and met with a Taiwanese man surnamed Lin (林) to discuss establishing a mobile software research and development (R&D) team in Taiwan, prosecutors said. Without approval from the government, Lin, following Liu’s instructions, recruited more than 70 software
RSS