Tue, Mar 19, 2024 page2

• Participants recall Sunflower protests a decade later

  • Staff writer, with CNA
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  A decade after the 2014 Sunflower movement, the young people who participated in the student-led demonstration have grown up, but many still carry the memories of what happened during the nearly 23-day occupation of Taiwan’s legislative chamber.

  On March 18, 2014, hundreds of students and activists stormed and occupied the chamber for 22 days and 21 hours in protest a decision by the legislature, which was controlled by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), to fast-track the review and approval of the cross-strait service trade agreement with China.

  Protesters were concerned that increased economic integration with China would give Beijing sway over Taiwan.

  

  Protesters occupy the legislative chamber at the Legislative Yuan in Taipei on March 28, 2014.

  Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times

  They received encouragement from the public, and hundreds of thousands of people took to the streets on March 30 in a show of their support.

  The protesters peacefully left the Legislative Yuan building after then-legislative speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) pledged to postpone the review of the trade pact until legislation overseeing all cross-strait agreements was passed.

  The service trade deal still remains stalled in the legislature.

  Meanwhile, activists from the Sunflower movement have become increasingly prominent on Taiwan’s political stage.

  Taipei City Councilor Miao Po-ya (苗博雅), of the Social Democratic Party, said one of the most significant effects of the movement was an increased focus on political participation among younger people.

  “In every election, the youth demographic continues to be a crucial force, because the movement was a pivotal moment in how Taiwan’s youth engaged in politics,” the 36-year-old said, adding that the voter turnout among young people had been relatively low before 2014.

  Although the Sunflower movement inspired her to enter politics, she has learned the limits of what social movements can achieve, Miao said.

  “Driving reform requires not only social movements, but also cooperation from the political side,” she said.

  Keelung City Councilor Jiho Tiun (張之豪), of the Democratic Progressive Party, said he believes participation in the movement has given candidates like him an advantage — but just a slight one.

  He ran in the 2018 and 2022 local elections and secured a seat on both occasions.

  Tiun used the entertainment industry as a metaphor for politics, saying: “The Sunflower Movement was not about helping you release a solo album, it was more about getting you on a popular variety show and standing [next to the host] with a smile.”

  After the Sunflower movement, the media tended to mythologize how young people had become devoted to politics, but many of those who participated are not involved in politics, Tiun added.

  Hung Chun-chih (洪俊智) did not pursue a career in politics, but, like many, experienced police brutality during the protest.

  Hung said he was beaten by police, and forced to disperse when they used water cannons.

  “Being dispersed did not extinguish my determination to protest; it only made me more eager to support those who had also been beaten,” Hung said.

  Although Hung now works at a technology company in Taipei, he always returns to his hometown in Nantou County to vote and encourages others to do so as well.

  “The Sunflower movement’s biggest impact on me is that it made me care more about the development of Taiwan’s democratic society and strengthened my sense of Taiwanese identity,” he said.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Investors diversify from TSMC to other winners of AI boom

  • 2

    HSR malfunction causes delays, reduced service

  • 3

    Japan ‘mystery illness’ not new: CDC

  • 4

    Taiwan eyes 100,000 drones a month

  • 5

    Taiwan, China coast guards argue in South China Sea