The Constitutional Court yesterday said that a law barring the “responsible” party from filing for divorce is not flawed in principle, but ordered the Legislative Yuan to better define the clause and provide a statute of limitations.
Article 1,052 of the Civil Code states: “Either the husband or the wife may petition for a juridical decree of divorce ... except if either the husband or the wife is responsible for the event, only the other party may petition for the divorce.”
Kaohsiung Juvenile and Family Court Judge Chu Cheng-kun (朱政坤) and two individuals embroiled in extramarital lawsuits filed for the constitutional interpretation, claiming that the article contravened the legal principle of proportionality.
Photo: Wang Yi-sung, Taipei Times
Legal experts said on condition of anonymity that under the Civil Code, only the person who “is not” or “is less” at fault can file for divorce.
Chu and the others argued that Article 1,052 limits the constitutionally guaranteed right to freedom of marriage.
After reviewing the case, the court ruled that the proviso in principle does not contravene the Constitution’s guaranteed right of freedom of marriage.
However, it did find the blanket ban barring the party responsible for the act causing the breakdown of the marriage from filing for divorce — regardless of whether it occurred so far in the past that it has exceeded legal memory or how long it continued — might be too strict.
In this sense, the proviso contravenes the freedom of marriage under the Constitution, it said.
The court ordered competent authorities to immediately draft an amendment to the article that would bring it in line with the Constitution and implement it within two years.
Should the amendment take longer than two years to pass, all rulings after March 24, 2025, should observe the spirit of the ruling, the court said.
It suggested that legislators define the “period” after or during an act causing the irreparable breakdown of a marriage for it to be considered as such.
It also suggested that legislators observe similar cases in foreign countries and consider eligible relaxing causes to file for divorce.
The legal system should adapt to the times and make provisions so that the rights of individuals without fault and children still under their care are protected by the law during the divorce process, the ruling said.
Disagreeing with the ruling, Chu said the proviso prevents couples who have already separated in spirit from being able to separate legally.
The Ministry of Justice said the proviso protects the sanctity of marriage, as it prevents any one party from unilaterally dissolving the marriage.
Additional reporting by Wu Cheng-feng
Three batches of banana sauce imported from the Philippines were intercepted at the border after they were found to contain the banned industrial dye Orange G, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said yesterday. From today through Sept. 2 next year, all seasoning sauces from the Philippines are to be subject to the FDA’s strictest border inspection, meaning 100 percent testing for illegal dyes before entry is allowed, it said in a statement. Orange G is an industrial coloring agent that is not permitted for food use in Taiwan or internationally, said Cheng Wei-chih (鄭維智), head of the FDA’s Northern Center for
LOOKING NORTH: The base would enhance the military’s awareness of activities in the Bashi Channel, which China Coast Guard ships have been frequenting, an expert said The Philippine Navy on Thursday last week inaugurated a forward operating base in the country’s northern most province of Batanes, which at 185km from Taiwan would be strategically important in a military conflict in the Taiwan Strait. The Philippine Daily Inquirer quoted Northern Luzon Command Commander Lieutenant General Fernyl Buca as saying that the base in Mahatao would bolster the country’s northern defenses and response capabilities. The base is also a response to the “irregular presence this month of armed” of China Coast Guard vessels frequenting the Bashi Channel in the Luzon Strait just south of Taiwan, the paper reported, citing a
The Chinese military has built landing bridge ships designed to expand its amphibious options for a potential assault on Taiwan, but their combat effectiveness is limited due to their high vulnerability, a defense expert said in an analysis published on Monday. Shen Ming-shih (沈明室), a research fellow at the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, said that the deployment of such vessels as part of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Navy’s East Sea Fleet signals a strong focus on Taiwan. However, the ships are highly vulnerable to precision strikes, which means they could be destroyed before they achieve their intended
UNDER PRESSURE: The report cited numerous events that have happened this year to show increased coercion from China, such as military drills and legal threats The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to reinforce its “one China” principle and the idea that Taiwan belongs to the People’s Republic of China by hosting celebratory events this year for the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II, the “retrocession” of Taiwan and the establishment of the UN, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said in its latest report to the Legislative Yuan. Taking advantage of the significant anniversaries, Chinese officials are attempting to assert China’s sovereignty over Taiwan through interviews with international news media and cross-strait exchange events, the report said. Beijing intends to reinforce its “one China” principle
RSS