The Constitutional Court yesterday said that a law barring the “responsible” party from filing for divorce is not flawed in principle, but ordered the Legislative Yuan to better define the clause and provide a statute of limitations.
Article 1,052 of the Civil Code states: “Either the husband or the wife may petition for a juridical decree of divorce ... except if either the husband or the wife is responsible for the event, only the other party may petition for the divorce.”
Kaohsiung Juvenile and Family Court Judge Chu Cheng-kun (朱政坤) and two individuals embroiled in extramarital lawsuits filed for the constitutional interpretation, claiming that the article contravened the legal principle of proportionality.
Photo: Wang Yi-sung, Taipei Times
Legal experts said on condition of anonymity that under the Civil Code, only the person who “is not” or “is less” at fault can file for divorce.
Chu and the others argued that Article 1,052 limits the constitutionally guaranteed right to freedom of marriage.
After reviewing the case, the court ruled that the proviso in principle does not contravene the Constitution’s guaranteed right of freedom of marriage.
However, it did find the blanket ban barring the party responsible for the act causing the breakdown of the marriage from filing for divorce — regardless of whether it occurred so far in the past that it has exceeded legal memory or how long it continued — might be too strict.
In this sense, the proviso contravenes the freedom of marriage under the Constitution, it said.
The court ordered competent authorities to immediately draft an amendment to the article that would bring it in line with the Constitution and implement it within two years.
Should the amendment take longer than two years to pass, all rulings after March 24, 2025, should observe the spirit of the ruling, the court said.
It suggested that legislators define the “period” after or during an act causing the irreparable breakdown of a marriage for it to be considered as such.
It also suggested that legislators observe similar cases in foreign countries and consider eligible relaxing causes to file for divorce.
The legal system should adapt to the times and make provisions so that the rights of individuals without fault and children still under their care are protected by the law during the divorce process, the ruling said.
Disagreeing with the ruling, Chu said the proviso prevents couples who have already separated in spirit from being able to separate legally.
The Ministry of Justice said the proviso protects the sanctity of marriage, as it prevents any one party from unilaterally dissolving the marriage.
Additional reporting by Wu Cheng-feng
Taiwan has received more than US$70 million in royalties as of the end of last year from developing the F-16V jet as countries worldwide purchase or upgrade to this popular model, government and military officials said on Saturday. Taiwan funded the development of the F-16V jet and ended up the sole investor as other countries withdrew from the program. Now the F-16V is increasingly popular and countries must pay Taiwan a percentage in royalties when they purchase new F-16V aircraft or upgrade older F-16 models. The next five years are expected to be the peak for these royalties, with Taiwan potentially earning
STAY IN YOUR LANE: As the US and Israel attack Iran, the ministry has warned China not to overstep by including Taiwanese citizens in its evacuation orders The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday rebuked a statement by China’s embassy in Israel that it would evacuate Taiwanese holders of Chinese travel documents from Israel amid the latter’s escalating conflict with Iran. Tensions have risen across the Middle East in the wake of US and Israeli airstrikes on Iran beginning Saturday. China subsequently issued an evacuation notice for its citizens. In a news release, the Chinese embassy in Israel said holders of “Taiwan compatriot permits (台胞證)” issued to Taiwanese nationals by Chinese authorities for travel to China — could register for evacuation to Egypt. In Taipei, the ministry yesterday said Taiwan
Taiwan is awaiting official notification from the US regarding the status of the Agreement on Reciprocal Trade (ART) after the US Supreme Court ruled US President Donald Trump's global tariffs unconstitutional. Speaking to reporters before a legislative hearing today, Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) said that Taiwan's negotiation team remains focused on ensuring that the bilateral trade deal remains intact despite the legal challenge to Trump's tariff policy. "The US has pledged to notify its trade partners once the subsequent administrative and legal processes are finalized, and that certainly includes Taiwan," Cho said when asked about opposition parties’ doubts that the ART was
If China chose to invade Taiwan tomorrow, it would only have to sever three undersea fiber-optic cable clusters to cause a data blackout, Jason Hsu (許毓仁), a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator, told a US security panel yesterday. In a Taiwan contingency, cable disruption would be one of the earliest preinvasion actions and the signal that escalation had begun, he said, adding that Taiwan’s current cable repair capabilities are insufficient. The US-China Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC) yesterday held a hearing on US-China Competition Under the Sea, with Hsu speaking on
RSS