Lithuanian President Gitanas Nauseda’s criticism on Tuesday of his country’s decision to allow Taipei to open a representative office in Vilnius using the name “Taiwanese” was a reflection of a domestic power struggle rather than a change in the Baltic state’s Taiwan policy, experts said.
Raigirdas Boruta, an associate expert at the Lithuanian think tank Eastern Europe Studies Centre, said that tense relations between Nauseda and Lithuanian Prime Minister Ingrida Simonyte had continued to heat up since the Cabinet led by Simonyte assumed office in December 2020.
“This recent statement by the president of Lithuania came as a surprise to many people in the country. Since the new Cabinet started its tenure, the Cabinet’s relationship with the president has been quite tense and complicated,” he said.
. Photo: screen grab from Facebook
“Recently, this friction has become more intense as the president is more vocal in his criticism towards the Simonyte government,” with Nauseda often saying he was rarely consulted on the Cabinet’s foreign policy-related decisions, Boruta said.
Marius Laurinavicius, a Lithuania-based expert on Russia, international affairs and security, agreed, saying that given the sensitivity of the cross-strait issue in the Baltic state, it is not unlikely that Nauseda was deliberately bringing up the topic to boost his own popularity.
Laurinavicius said that Nauseda’s remarks were “a very big foreign mistake.”
Photo: screen grab from Twitter
Bringing this ongoing political fight to the world stage would substantially weaken Lithuania’s international position, he added.
In Taipei, Marcin Jerzewski, a Polish research fellow at local think tank Taiwan NextGen Foundation, where he leads the New Southbound Policy research program, said that in the Lithuanian political system, the president is the head of state, and oversees foreign and security policy.
The prime minister, appointed by the president, is the head of government and is responsible for domestic affairs.
However, in practice, the duties of the president and prime minister are somewhat murky, he added.
Nauseda’s comments are not unusual within the context of Lithuania’s semi-presidential democracy, where conflicts between prime ministers and presidents are common.
Nauseda and Simonyte are political opponents and squared off in the second round of Lithuania’s 2019 presidential election, Jerzewski added.
“Ultimately, the reorientation of Vilnius’ China policy is a project of the ruling coalition, which took office a year ago,” while the public remains wary of the actual effects of the diplomatic row, he said.
Consequently, comments about Lithuania backing down from supporting Taiwan are “nugatory,” he said.
Nauseda said during a radio interview on Tuesday that there was nothing wrong with agreeing to the establishment of a Taiwanese office in Vilnius in November, but the problem was the official name — the Taiwanese Representative Office in Lithuania.
“The name of the office became a key factor that now has a very strong impact on our relations with China,” he said in the interview with Ziniu Radijas.
“I believe the name was the spark, and now we have to deal with the consequences,” he added.
Asked if Nauseda’s comments could mean the Lithuanian government might ask the Taiwanese office to change its name, Boruta and Laurinavicius said it was unlikely.
Nauseda’s controversial comments had elevated a domestic argument onto the international stage and was not in the national interests of the Baltic state, Laurinavicius said.
Forcing the Taiwanese office to change its name would not generate any benefits for Lithuania from China, but would only hurt its relations with the US, he added.
Asked to comment on Nauseda’s remarks, the Lithuanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs said it had no comment for the time being.
Representative to Lithuania Eric Huang (黃鈞耀) said his office had so far not been asked by the host country to change its name.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Joanne Ou (歐江安) on Tuesday said that the ministry had noted Nauseda’s remarks in the interview, but did not wish to comment on the foreign policy of another country.
Taiwan will continue to support Lithuania amid the pressure it has encountered from China on all fronts simply because it allowed the opening of the representative office under the name “Taiwanese,” she added.
Taiwan’s representative offices in other countries with which it does not have official diplomatic relations usually use “Taipei” in their official names.
Beijing has sought to impose a cost on Lithuania for its decision, which it sees as implying Taiwan’s formal independence.
China’s recent retaliatory actions have included recalling its ambassador to Lithuania and expelling the Lithuanian ambassador from Beijing, as well as suspending direct freight train services to the Baltic state and banning Lithuanian products.
The Coast Guard Administration (CGA) yesterday said it had deployed patrol vessels to expel a China Coast Guard ship and a Chinese fishing boat near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙群島) in the South China Sea. The China Coast Guard vessel was 28 nautical miles (52km) northeast of Pratas at 6:15am on Thursday, approaching the island’s restricted waters, which extend 24 nautical miles from its shoreline, the CGA’s Dongsha-Nansha Branch said in a statement. The Tainan, a 2,000-tonne cutter, was deployed by the CGA to shadow the Chinese ship, which left the area at 2:39pm on Friday, the statement said. At 6:31pm on Friday,
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy’s (PLAN) third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, would pose a steep challenge to Taiwan’s ability to defend itself against a full-scale invasion, a defense expert said yesterday. Institute of National Defense and Security Research analyst Chieh Chung (揭仲) made the comment hours after the PLAN confirmed the carrier recently passed through the Taiwan Strait to conduct “scientific research tests and training missions” in the South China Sea. China has two carriers in operation — the Liaoning and the Shandong — with the Fujian undergoing sea trials. Although the PLAN needs time to train the Fujian’s air wing and
The American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) put Taiwan in danger, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation director Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑) said yesterday, hours after the de facto US embassy said that Beijing had misinterpreted World War II-era documents to isolate Taiwan. The AIT’s comments harmed the Republic of China’s (ROC) national interests and contradicted a part of the “six assurances” stipulating that the US would not change its official position on Taiwan’s sovereignty, Hsiao said. The “six assurances,” which were given by then-US president Ronald Reagan to Taiwan in 1982, say that Washington would not set a date for ending arm sales to Taiwan, consult
A Taiwanese academic yesterday said that Chinese Ambassador to Denmark Wang Xuefeng (王雪峰) disrespected Denmark and Japan when he earlier this year allegedly asked Japan’s embassy to make Taiwan’s representatives leave an event in Copenhagen. The Danish-language Berlingske on Sunday reported the incident in an article with the headline “The emperor’s birthday ended in drama in Copenhagen: More conflict may be on the way between Denmark and China.” It said that on Feb. 26, the Japanese embassy in Denmark held an event for Japanese Emperor Naruhito’s birthday, with about 200 guests in attendance, including representatives from Taiwan. After addressing the Japanese hosts, Wang