The Ministry of Justice on Wednesday unveiled proposed amendments to privacy laws targeting creators of deepfake and “revenge” pornography with sentences of seven and five years in prison respectively.
The proposals are in response to the arrest last month of Taiwanese YouTuber Chu Yu-chen (朱玉宸), who is suspected of creating and selling pornographic videos that were digitally altered to include the likenesses of famous politicians.
The drafts have been forwarded to the Executive Yuan for review before they are sent to the legislature for approval, Minister of Justice Tsai Ching-hsiang (蔡清祥) said.
While the proposal dealing with “revenge porn” has been in the works since March, the provisions dealing with pornography using another person’s likeness without their consent were drafted in response to demand from the legislature, he said.
The bill would shore up privacy protections under Chapter 28 of the Criminal Code, the ministry’s head prosecutor Lin Ying-tzu (林映姿) said, adding that the chapter is to be renamed from “offenses against privacy” to “offenses against privacy and sexual privacy.”
The proposal stipulates that manufacturing and distributing falsified sexual recordings for commercial purpose — which includes deepfakes — is punishable by a sentence of up to seven years in prison, she said.
Creating illegal deepfake pornography for private use and distribution would be considered a lesser crime subject to a prison sentence of up to five years, she said.
The creation of nonsexual deepfakes that falsify the action, speech or conversation of a person carries a penalty of up to three years in prison, while committing the offense with a commercial motive is punishable by five years in prison, she added.
While the bill also covers deepfakes created for political purpose, the ministry is considering an amendment to the Civil Servants Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法) that would explicitly outlaw the use of deepfakes for electoral gain, Lin said.
The amendments would not ban computer-generated imagery and effects utilized in the film industry or other benign uses of synthetic media, she said.
“The legal standard is whether a manufactured image or video might pose material harm to the public or personal interest,” she added.
The proposed amendments would address digital voyeurism and revenge porn by punishing the crime under its own legal category, she said.
The law currently treats recording intimate videos without consent no differently than unauthorized recordings of a nonsexual nature, which carries a sentence of no more than three years in prison, Lin said.
That penalty is insufficient to deal with infringements on sexual privacy enabled by camera-equipped cellphones and other Internet-connected devices, she said.
The amendment stipulates that creating an unauthorized recording of a sexual nature is a separate and more severe offense punishable by a sentence of up to four years and six months in prison, she said.
Making unauthorized recordings of sex with intent to commercially distribute them carries an increased sentence of up to five years in prison, while simply distributing an intimate recording without consent carries a prison sentence of no more than two years, she said.
Additional reporting by CNA
Former Czech Republic-based Taiwanese researcher Cheng Yu-chin (鄭宇欽) has been sentenced to seven years in prison on espionage-related charges, China’s Ministry of State Security announced yesterday. China said Cheng was a spy for Taiwan who “masqueraded as a professor” and that he was previously an assistant to former Cabinet secretary-general Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰). President-elect William Lai (賴清德) on Wednesday last week announced Cho would be his premier when Lai is inaugurated next month. Today is China’s “National Security Education Day.” The Chinese ministry yesterday released a video online showing arrests over the past 10 years of people alleged to be
THE HAWAII FACTOR: While a 1965 opinion said an attack on Hawaii would not trigger Article 5, the text of the treaty suggests the state is covered, the report says NATO could be drawn into a conflict in the Taiwan Strait if Chinese forces attacked the US mainland or Hawaii, a NATO Defense College report published on Monday says. The report, written by James Lee, an assistant research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of European and American Studies, states that under certain conditions a Taiwan contingency could trigger Article 5 of NATO, under which an attack against any member of the alliance is considered an attack against all members, necessitating a response. Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty specifies that an armed attack in the territory of any member in Europe,
LIKE FAMILY: People now treat dogs and cats as family members. They receive the same medical treatments and tests as humans do, a veterinary association official said The number of pet dogs and cats in Taiwan has officially outnumbered the number of human newborns last year, data from the Ministry of Agriculture’s pet registration information system showed. As of last year, Taiwan had 94,544 registered pet dogs and 137,652 pet cats, the data showed. By contrast, 135,571 babies were born last year. Demand for medical care for pet animals has also risen. As of Feb. 29, there were 5,773 veterinarians in Taiwan, 3,993 of whom were for pet animals, statistics from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Agency showed. In 2022, the nation had 3,077 pediatricians. As of last
XINJIANG: Officials are conducting a report into amending an existing law or to enact a special law to prohibit goods using forced labor Taiwan is mulling an amendment prohibiting the importation of goods using forced labor, similar to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) passed by the US Congress in 2021 that imposed limits on goods produced using forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region. A government official who wished to remain anonymous said yesterday that as the US customs law explicitly prohibits the importation of goods made using forced labor, in 2021 it passed the specialized UFLPA to limit the importation of cotton and other goods from China’s Xinjiang Uyghur region. Taiwan does not have the legal basis to prohibit the importation of goods