A legal argument over whether convicted sex offenders should be held in a designated facility for mandatory therapy after release from prison was heard on Tuesday by the Council of Grand Justices.
The argument revolves around Article 22-1 of the Sexual Assault Crime Prevention Act (性侵害犯罪防治法), which states that sex offenders can be ordered to undergo inpatient treatment after completing their prison term if a medical evaluation concludes that there is a danger of recidivism.
While the law specifies that offenders must be evaluated yearly to determine their rehabilitation progress, it does not set a maximum period for such therapy, meaning that in principle, they can be held indefinitely.
The four petitioners in the case are asking the grand justices to rule on a maximum period for treatment in a psychiatric facility designated for that purpose.
Their argument is that the law breaches Article 8 of the Constitution, which guarantees personal freedom, and also Article 23, which deals with the principle of proportionality.
The lead petitioner in the case, surnamed Lu (盧), served a sentence from 2008 to 2011 for a sexual offense and — based on annual medical evaluations — has since been in compulsory therapy at a psychiatric facility because he is deemed a threat to the public.
Judge Chang Yuan-sen (張淵森), one of the petitioners, highlighted the case of another petitioner, surnamed Tseng (曾), who served seven months in prison for a sexual offense and was held for an additional four years in a treatment facility.
While the risk of recidivism among sex offenders is well known, Tseng’s case showed a clear lack of proportionality, given that he spent seven times as long in psychiatric detention as in prison, Chang said.
If there is no limit on the mandatory therapy period, people can be locked away for life, regardless of the severity of their crimes, Chang said.
Deputy Minister of Justice Tsai Pi-chung (蔡碧仲) said that compulsory therapy is a form of rehabilitation rather than punishment, so none of the laws breach the Constitution’s guarantee of personal freedom.
Tsai also pushed back on the argument that the system was being used injudiciously, saying that of the 9,049 offenders convicted under the act from 2010 to September, only 158, or 1.74 percent, had been ordered into compulsory treatment and most of them have since been released.
“If the Council of Grand Justices rules that this system is a violation of the Constitution, who will assume responsibility” for the 56 people in therapy? Tsai asked.
Taiwan is facing a “reckoning” on the issue of sexual offenses and the court should not discuss the impact of such crimes in abstract terms, he said.
Speaking to reporters after the court hearing, Tsai said that statement was a reference to the furor over the case of a 24-year-old Malaysian student who last week was abducted near her university in Tainan and killed.
In such cases, the focus should not solely be on the rights of the suspect, but also on the pain caused to the victim and their families, he said, adding that sex offenders should only be released when authorities can be certain there is little risk of recidivism.
The Council of Grand Justices is required to issue a decision within three months after hearing oral arguments on a petition.
Former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) on Monday called for greater cooperation between Taiwan, Lithuania and the EU to counter threats to information security, including attacks on undersea cables and other critical infrastructure. In a speech at Vilnius University in the Lithuanian capital, Tsai highlighted recent incidents in which vital undersea cables — essential for cross-border data transmission — were severed in the Taiwan Strait and the Baltic Sea over the past year. Taiwanese authorities suspect Chinese sabotage in the incidents near Taiwan’s waters, while EU leaders have said Russia is the likely culprit behind similar breaches in the Baltic. “Taiwan and our European
The Taipei District Court sentenced babysitters Liu Tsai-hsuan (劉彩萱) and Liu Jou-lin (劉若琳) to life and 18 years in prison respectively today for causing the death of a one-year-old boy in December 2023. The Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office said that Liu Tsai-hsuan was entrusted with the care of a one-year-old boy, nicknamed Kai Kai (剴剴), in August 2023 by the Child Welfare League Foundation. From Sept. 1 to Dec. 23 that year, she and her sister Liu Jou-lin allegedly committed acts of abuse against the boy, who was rushed to the hospital with severe injuries on Dec. 24, 2023, but did not
LIKE-MINDED COUNTRIES: Despite the threats from outside, Taiwan and Lithuania thrived and developed their economies, former president Tsai Ing-wen said Former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) on Saturday thanked Lithuania for its support of Taiwan, saying that both countries are united as partners in defending democracy. Speaking at a reception organized by the Lithuania-Taiwan Parliamentary Friendship Group welcoming her on her first visit to the Baltic state, Tsai said that while she was president from 2016 to last year, many Lithuanian “friends” visited Taiwan. “And I told myself I have to be here. I am very happy that I am here, a wonderful country and wonderful people,” Tsai said. Taiwan and Lithuania are in similar situations as both are neighbors to authoritarian countries, she
Former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) is to visit the UK during her ongoing European trip, which originally included only Lithuania and Denmark, her office said today. Tsai departed Taiwan for Europe on Friday night, with planned stops in Lithuania and Denmark, marking her second visit to the continent since her two-term presidency ended in May last year. Her office issued a statement today saying that Tsai would also visit the UK "for a few days," during which she is to meet with UK politicians and Taiwanese professionals, and visit academic and research institutions. Following Tsai's stop in Denmark, she is to visit the
RSS