Judicial reform advocates on the third day of a sit-in protest outside of the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday questioned the stance of senior Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) leaders on the jury system, likening them to China’s leadership.
Judicial Reform Foundation chairman Lin Yung-sung (林永頌) said he asked DPP caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) why the Legislative Yuan did not include a bill to implement a jury system in its agenda for the extraordinary session, but did include a rival proposal for a lay judge system.
Ker said he had not removed the jury system proposal, it was the decision of the party’s top officials, Lin said.
China’s new national security legislation for Hong Kong, in Article 46, excludes the use of a jury system, Lin said.
“Taiwan is a democratic nation, and we expect our government leaders to have the intelligence and courage to adopt the jury system to protect all our citizens. It can highlight the difference between us and authoritarian regimes,” he said.
When he had asked President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) previously about why Taiwan cannot adopt the jury system, she replied: “When there is no judge around, can people really do it [decide on a verdict],” he said
“The thing is, whether it be a jury system or a lay judge system, you have to trust the people,” Lin said.
Attorney Jerry Cheng (鄭文龍), founder of the Taiwan Jury Association, said that China’s exclusion of a jury system showed that autocratic regimes are afraid of it.
“Over the past decades, many leading figures in Taiwan’s democracy movement fought for judicial reform, for implementation of a jury system, so why is the DPP government afraid of democracy in the judicial system,” Cheng said.
“Why is President Tsai taking the same stance as Chinese leader Xi Jinping (習近平) regarding the jury system,” he added.
The DPP’s party charter, drafted by the early leaders of Taiwan’s democracy movement, showed they were aware of the need to have a jury system, he said.
“They knew a jury trial is needed for cases involving sedition charges, or offenses against internal and external security of the state. It is also needed to prosecute government officials for corruption, for breeches of the law during street protests, for impeding police from carrying out their duty and other politically contentious cases,” he said.
“Only jury trials can provide protection for the freedom of speech for political dissidents and regular citizens in such cases,” he said.
“Our alliance has begun a long-term sit-in, to act like the magic mirrors of fairy tales. Our mirror is revealing the monsters and demons active in Taiwan’s political arena. It is showing the politicians who have deceived the public with their promises,” he added.
Taiwan has received more than US$70 million in royalties as of the end of last year from developing the F-16V jet as countries worldwide purchase or upgrade to this popular model, government and military officials said on Saturday. Taiwan funded the development of the F-16V jet and ended up the sole investor as other countries withdrew from the program. Now the F-16V is increasingly popular and countries must pay Taiwan a percentage in royalties when they purchase new F-16V aircraft or upgrade older F-16 models. The next five years are expected to be the peak for these royalties, with Taiwan potentially earning
STAY IN YOUR LANE: As the US and Israel attack Iran, the ministry has warned China not to overstep by including Taiwanese citizens in its evacuation orders The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday rebuked a statement by China’s embassy in Israel that it would evacuate Taiwanese holders of Chinese travel documents from Israel amid the latter’s escalating conflict with Iran. Tensions have risen across the Middle East in the wake of US and Israeli airstrikes on Iran beginning Saturday. China subsequently issued an evacuation notice for its citizens. In a news release, the Chinese embassy in Israel said holders of “Taiwan compatriot permits (台胞證)” issued to Taiwanese nationals by Chinese authorities for travel to China — could register for evacuation to Egypt. In Taipei, the ministry yesterday said Taiwan
Taiwan is awaiting official notification from the US regarding the status of the Agreement on Reciprocal Trade (ART) after the US Supreme Court ruled US President Donald Trump's global tariffs unconstitutional. Speaking to reporters before a legislative hearing today, Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) said that Taiwan's negotiation team remains focused on ensuring that the bilateral trade deal remains intact despite the legal challenge to Trump's tariff policy. "The US has pledged to notify its trade partners once the subsequent administrative and legal processes are finalized, and that certainly includes Taiwan," Cho said when asked about opposition parties’ doubts that the ART was
If China chose to invade Taiwan tomorrow, it would only have to sever three undersea fiber-optic cable clusters to cause a data blackout, Jason Hsu (許毓仁), a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator, told a US security panel yesterday. In a Taiwan contingency, cable disruption would be one of the earliest preinvasion actions and the signal that escalation had begun, he said, adding that Taiwan’s current cable repair capabilities are insufficient. The US-China Economic and Security Review Commission (USCC) yesterday held a hearing on US-China Competition Under the Sea, with Hsu speaking on
RSS