Thu, Aug 25, 2016 page3

• INTERVIEW: Intercity forum befits China agenda: academic

  COLD SHOULDER: The Taipei-Shanghai forum is a way to bring delegates to the nation to make informal contacts and ally itself with the ‘secondary enemy,’ Kou Chien-wen said

  • By Ho Shih-chang and Jonathan Chin / Staff reporter, with staff writer
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  The Taipei-Shanghai forum being held in Taipei this week is an information-gathering exercise for Beijing to benefit its cross-strait policy, said Kou Chien-wen (寇健文), a professor of political science at National Chengchi University’s Graduate Institute of East Asian Studies.

  Sha Hailin (沙海林), director of the Shanghai Municipal Committee United Front Work Department and the first high-ranking Chinese official to visit Taiwan since President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) assumed office on May 20, arrived in Taipei on Monday to attend a forum on Tuesday.

  Beijing has applied pressure on the Tsai administration since it took office by cooling cross-strait exchanges and shutting the various communications links established by former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) to isolate Taiwan, Kou said in an interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (sister paper of the Taipei Times).

  

  Kou Chien-wen, chair of the Graduate Institute of East Asian Studies at National Chengchi University, speaks during an interview in Taipei on Thursday last week.

  Photo: Huang Yao-cheng, Taipei Times

  To date, Beijing has cut the “first track” channel between the Mainland Affairs Council and it’s Taiwan Affairs Office, and the “second track” between the Straits Exchange Foundation and China’s Association for Relation Across the Taiwan Straits.

  Beijing has also placed a virtual freeze on interactions between privately owned think tanks, he said.

  Beijing has also moved to dampen informal cross-strait exchanges by limiting the number of Chinese tourists and students to Taiwan, playing up the recent bus fire accident in Taiwan that killed 24 Chinese tourists, encouraging talk that Taiwanese are unfriendly toward Chinese and forbidding Taiwan-related advertisements in Chinese media, Kou said.

  However, withholding official exchanges over a long period has proved to be “a double-edged sword,” because Beijing has in the past depended on information gleaned from China’s exchanges with senior officials in the former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government, academics and journalists to make or fine-tune its policy, information that became unavailable with the self-imposed freeze in exchanges, he said.

  Although Beijing could still count on pan-blue leaders to supply information, their intelligence on Taiwan affairs tends to be “one-sided and of dubious veracity,” Kou said.

  “From the Chinese perspective, a continuation of the intercity forum meetings offers many potential benefits,” he said, adding that as long as the forum is packaged as a “municipal exchange,” Beijing has the opportunity to accomplish three major goals important to its cross-strait policy.

  First, Beijing sees the forum as a “reward” to Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) for making remarks ingratiating to China, such as his comment that “the peoples across the Strait belong to the same family” and his “respect” for the so-called “1992 consensus” — a purported tacit understanding reached during cross-strait talks in 1992 that both Taiwan and China acknowledge that there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what that means. Former Mainland Affairs Council chairman Su Chi (蘇起) has admitted to making up the term in 2000.

  “By setting Ko as a good example, Beijing is hinting to the Tsai administration that they can achieve good relations with China by taking baby steps,” Kou said.

  Second, Sha could invite nominal observers and researchers to Taiwan to engage in social networking, yet without suggesting that cross-strait relations have improved and lessening pressure on Tsai, he said.

  “Ko’s unanticipated success as a non-mainstream party candidate has turned him into the biggest potential adversary of the DPP in the next election. Ko has no party baggage and is relatively receptive of the ‘1992 consensus,’ so Beijing’s calculation is to ‘ally with the secondary enemy to attack the primary enemy,’” Kou said.

  Beijing is concerned about the viability of the KMT as a political entity after its landslide election losses this year, Kou said, adding that the proof is in Sha’s meeting yesterday with New Taipei City Mayor Eric Chu (朱立倫).

  Third, the forum allows China’s high-level officials to engage their counterparts in dialogue, without contradicting the official story of icy cross-strait relations that Beijing worked hard to maintain, Kou said, adding that the forum is the only realistic window China has with Taiwan after communications on the first track and the second track.

  The fact that Beijing sent Sha to the forum — a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Municipal Standing Committee member and a United Front Work director whose credentials overshadow the nominal star of the delegation, Shanghai Mayor Yang Xiong (楊雄) — is a move that allows Beijing to engage in dialogue without changing its posture, Kou said.

  Though Beijing is maintaining its cold-shoulder policy toward the Tsai administration, important regional events scheduled later this year, such as the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and APEC meetings, would make interaction unavoidable; as such, Sha’s attendance at the forum in Taipei could give Beijing an unofficial go-between to smooth things over with Taiwan before later events, he added.

  “In the sense that this forum does not affect Beijing’s posturing or cause Tsai any embarrassment, going ahead with the forum is a pragmatic move,” Kou said.

  In the forum, Ko should focus on being the “bridge” between Tsai and Beijing and not leverage his role against the DPP for greater influence, because Ko’s support ratings have been declining in the polls, while Tsai’s support remains comparatively strong, Kou said.

  According to Kou, although Beijing has said Tsai has given it an “incomplete test paper” on cross-strait relations and has neglected to give answers, Beijing has not completed its evaluation of Tsai’s administration, which is pending until the CCP’s National Congress in autumn next year, giving both sides “ample time” to deal with the situation.

  However, the congress will result in significant changes in the CCP hierarchy and if Beijing does not find Tsai’s responses to its liking, it is a certainty that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) will take action to forestall the Taiwan issue from becoming a political weapon that his adversaries could use against him or his faction, Kou said.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Roadside saliva tests to begin by end of the year

  • 2

    Registration for NT$10,000 to open on Nov. 5

  • 3

    MOFA rejects ‘Time’ ‘reckless leader’ label

  • 4

    Taiwan in Time: The breakfast that sparked Taiwan’s semiconductor revolution

  • 5

    NT$10,000 cash handout explainer