On March 4, a massive piece of space junk reportedly crashed into *the far side of the Moon. Due to its location facing away from the Earth, it may take months to identify the impact site of the object. However, scientists predict the crash will have little effect on the Moon besides forming a new crater.
The junk was initially thought to belong to an old SpaceX rocket after astronomers first noticed the object heading towards the Moon. However, it was later found that the debris was most likely a Chinese-owned rocket. Chinese officials have denied this, saying the rocket in question had burned up when re-entering the Earth’s atmosphere.
While the rocket’s original owner and its impact on the Moon are not significant, the issue does raise an important question about space junk. It’s estimated that there are currently more than 30,000 pieces of space junk larger than 10 centimeters in orbit around the Earth. These objects pose very little threat to us because they burn up in the atmosphere if they start to fall back to the planet.
Photo courtesy of Shutterstock 照片:Shutterstock提供
However, these objects can be a significant threat to satellites and other devices. These scrap pieces move at speeds of up to eight kilometers per second and cause severe damage if they collide with essential devices in space. As a result, a growing group of scientists are calling for action to resolve this issue before it affects our ability to travel into space.
據報導,有一塊巨大的太空垃圾在三月四日撞擊月球背面。由於事發位置背對地球,因此可能需要花費數月才能確定太空垃圾的撞擊地點。然而,科學家預測,除了形成一個新的隕石坑外,這次撞擊對月球沒什麼影響。
在天文學家最初注意到太空垃圾朝月球的方向前進後,原先認為其為屬於SpaceX之前的一枚火箭。不過,後來發現太空垃圾最有可能是一枚中國擁有的火箭。中國官員否認了這一點,宣稱提及的那枚火箭在重新進入地球大氣層時就已燃燒殆盡。
雖然火箭原主不重要,且其對月球的影響並不大,但這個議題確實引發了一個關於太空垃圾的重要問題。據估計,目前有超過三萬片大於十公分的太空垃圾在環繞地球的軌道上運行。這些物體對我們構成的威脅不大,因為如果它們開始掉落回到地球,其會在大氣層中燃燒殆盡。
然而,這些物體可能會對衛星和其他設備構成一大威脅。這些廢棄的碎片移動速度最高可達每秒八公里,而且如果它們撞上太空中重要的設備,就會造成嚴重的損壞。因此,越來越多科學家呼籲,在這個議題影響到人類進行太空旅行的能力之前,要採取行動解決它。
*the far side of the Moon 指的即是「月球永遠背對地球的那一面」,即「月球背面」。
What Did You Learn?
1. Which of the following is true about the space junk that hit the Moon?
(A) It was visible from the Earth when it struck the Moon.
(B) Astronomers did not notice it until it crashed into the Moon.
(C) A crater might be formed because of the impact of the junk.
(D) It was supposed to burn up in the atmosphere before it reached the Moon.
2. According to the passage, why is space junk a serious concern?
(A) It can threaten important satellites.
(B) It can cost a lot of money to clean it up.
(C) It can cause serious damage to the Moon.
(D) It can fall back down to Earth and harm people.
3. What are an increasing number of scientists asking for?
(A) Construction of more rockets to travel to space.
(B) Further research into the far side of the Moon.
(C) The problem of space trash to be addressed.
(D) Protection of scientific satellites in space.
答案: 1. (C) 2. (A) 3. (C)
Word in Use
1. identify vt. 確定,發現
The engineer still can’t identify the problem that caused the equipment to break down.
那名工程師仍無法確定是什麼問題造成設備當機。
2. predict vt. 預測
The typhoon is predicted to make landfall tomorrow morning.
該颱風被預測明早會登陸。
3. initially adv. 最初,起先
The building initially served as a palace, but it has been turned into a museum.
那棟建築最初是皇宮,但現已變成為博物館。
4. issue n. 議題
The novel discussed several issues, including air pollution.
那本小說探討了好幾個議題,包含空汙問題。
5. estimate vt. 估計,估算
It was difficult to estimate how many people received injuries in the accident.
那次意外很難估算有多少人受傷。
Practical Phrases
1. face away from 背對;把臉轉離開
Allison faced away from the blood when the doctor was cleaning her wounds.
醫生在清洗艾莉森的傷口時,她把臉轉開不看血。
2. belong to... 屬於…
The note posted on the fridge door reads, “Do not take food that doesn’t belong to you.”
貼在冰箱門的紙條寫著:「別把不屬於你的食物拿走。」
3. sb / sth in question 正被談論的某人/物
While we were talking about the newcomer, the colleague in question showed up.
我們正在討論新人時,被談論的那位同事就出現了。
4. burn up 燒盡,燒毀
Acres of the forest have burned up because of the wildfires.
好幾畝的林地因野火而燒毀。
5. pose little / no threat to... 對…的威脅不大/沒有威脅
The factory owner claimed that the waste posed no threat to human health, but the residents didn’t believe him.
那位工廠老闆宣稱該廢料對人體的健康沒有危害,但居民不相信他。
聽文章朗讀及講解: https://ivy.pse.is/455bfu
本文出自常春藤解析英語雜誌: www.ivy.com.tw
A: Wow, three Taiwanese restaurants just won the 2024 “Asia’s 50 Best Restaurants” awards. B: Awesome! Which three restaurants? A: Taipei’s Logy at No. 22 and MUME at No. 34, and Taichung’s JL Studio at No. 33. B: Actually, there are many more great establishments in Taipei. How about other Asian cities? A: Singapore claimed nine spots this year, making it Asia’s new “food capital.” A: 2024「亞洲50最佳餐廳」名單揭曉了,台灣有3家餐廳上榜。 B: 好厲害,哪3家? A: 台北的Logy和MUME分獲第22和34名,台中的JL Studio獲第33名! B: 其實台北還有很多好餐廳,那其他的亞洲城市呢? A: 新加坡今年入選9家,可說是亞洲美食之都。 (By Eddy Chang, Taipei Times/台北時報張聖恩)
Let’s explore another delicacy primarily known to Tainan locals: floating milkfish in thick soup. Despite its peculiar name, this dish is another Tainan specialty that showcases the popularity of milkfish, which is made into fish paste and served in thick soup. Unlike the version with tutuo fish, which also adds other ingredients to its thick soup, the floating milkfish version primarily features the “floating fish” itself in its thick soup, ensuring that the fish paste remains the star of the dish. 讓我們來探索另一道台南人熟悉的美食:浮水魚羹。這道菜名奇特的美食,再再展現了台南虱目魚料理的多樣。浮水魚羹是用虱目魚漿做成的羹品,雖然和𩵚魠魚羹一樣是羹湯,但不像𩵚魠魚羹會在湯中加入其他食材,而是讓虱目魚漿成為這道料理的主角。 peculiar (adj.) 獨特的;古怪的 The belly of a milkfish is considered the most
The practice of freezing embryos as part of in vitro fertilization (IVF) was thrown into chaos in Alabama this year, when the state supreme court ruled that such embryos should be considered children, exposing clinics to wrongful death claims in the event they are destroyed in the thawing process. In 2021, more than 80 percent of US IVF procedures involved the transfer of frozen embryos, according to a recent report by the US Department of Health and Human Services. HOW IS EMBRYO FREEZING USED IN IVF? IVF uses high doses of hormones to stimulate ovaries to produce as many eggs as possible. Once
A situation puzzle is a game in which one person describes a scenario and asks the players to explain it. The situation is deliberately lacking in details, but the players may acquire more information by asking questions — however, these can only be answered with “yes” or “no.” A player wins by describing the approximate events that led up to the situation. To do so, they must use a blend of logical and lateral thinking. A famous example of this is sometimes known as “Turtle Soup.” Here’s the riddle: “A man in a restaurant orders turtle soup, tastes it