A Chinese takeover of Taiwan would severely threaten the national security of the US, Japan, the Philippines and other nations, while global economic losses could reach US$10 trillion, National Security Council Deputy Secretary-General Lin Fei-fan (林飛帆) wrote in an article published yesterday in Foreign Affairs.
“The future of Taiwan is not merely a regional concern; it is a test of whether the international order can withstand the pressure of authoritarian expansionism,” Lin wrote in the article titled “Taiwan’s Plan for Peace Through Strength — How Investments in Resilience Can Deter Beijing.”
Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) intent to take Taiwan by force and become the Indo-Pacific hegemon has been clear since he came to power in 2012, Lin wrote, citing China’s military exercises in the Taiwan Strait, aerial incursions of Taiwanese airspace and disinformation campaigns as part of its efforts to bring about the “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.”
Photo: Chang Chia-ming, Taipei Times
“Beijing’s campaign is designed not simply to intimidate, but to erode Taiwan’s confidence and capacity to resist,” he said.
Taipei’s leaders have repeatedly warned partners and allies that Beijing’s ambitions extend beyond Taiwan, and that China and its allies seek to reshape the global order, he said.
“Should Taipei fall to Beijing, the resulting power shift could fundamentally alter the global order. Strategically, China would gain a forward operating base in the western Pacific, threatening several vital sea-lanes and undermining the US’ ability to meet security commitments to its Indo-Pacific partners and allies,” he said.
“The survival of a small democracy up against a powerful authoritarian adversary depends on preparations made long before the first shot is fired,” Lin said.
The administration of former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) pledged US$18.5 billion over 10 years to increase civil defense capabilities and bolster infrastructure, laying the foundation for a much more structured whole-of-society resilience campaign under President William Lai (賴清德), he said.
The efforts go a long way toward ensuring that Taiwan is developing the mindset that surrender is never an option — a model also present in Ukraine, Israel and Finland, he said.
Public support is key to achieving national resilience, and the opposition parties’ claims that arms purchases only antagonize Beijing are wrong, he said.
Taiwan has little time to waste as authoritarian aggressors are seeking to change the world order, Lin said.
“Many of Taiwan’s international partners, including the United States, are also engaging across Taipei’s political lines to illustrate the importance and urgency of such preparations,” he said.
Taiwan producing the majority of the world’s most advanced semiconductors, and being a part of a critical hub for global trade, means that any disruption to trade or manufacturing in the region would “reverberate across global markets, crippling industries from consumer electronics to automotive manufacturing and even defense systems,” Lin said.
SILENCING CRITICS: In addition to blocking Taiwan, China aimed to prevent rights activists from speaking out against authoritarian states, a Cabinet department said The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday condemned transnational repression by Beijing after RightsCon, a major digital human rights conference scheduled to be held in Zambia this week, was abruptly canceled due to Chinese pressure over Taiwanese participation. This year’s RightsCon, the world’s largest conference discussing issues “at the intersection of human rights and technology,” was scheduled to take place from tomorrow to Friday in Lusaka, and expected to draw 2,600 in-person attendees from 150 countries, along with 1,100 online participants. However, organizers were forced to cancel the event due to behind-the-scenes pressure from China, the ministry said, expressing its “strongest condemnation”
Taiwan’s economy grew far faster than expected in the first quarter, as booming demand for artificial intelligence (AI) applications drove a surge in exports, spilling over into investment and consumption, the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) said yesterday. GDP growth was 13.69 percent year-on-year during the January-to-March period, beating the DGBAS’ February forecast by 2.23 percentage points and marking the most robust growth in nearly four decades, DGBAS senior official Chiang Hsin-yi (江心怡) told a news conference in Taipei. The result was powered by exports, which remain the backbone of Taiwan’s economy, Chiang said. Outbound shipments jumped 51.12 percent year-on-year to
DELAYED BUT DETERMINED: The president’s visit highlights Taiwan’s right to international engagement amid regional pressure from China President Willaim Lai (賴清德) yesterday arrived in Eswatini, more than a week after his planned visit to Taiwan’s sole African ally was suspended because of revoked overflight permits. “The visit, originally scheduled for April 22, was postponed due to unforeseen external factors,” Lai wrote on social media. “After several days of careful arrangements by our diplomatic and national security teams, we successfully arrived today.” Lai said he looked forward to further deepening Taiwan-Eswatini relations through closer cooperation in the economy, agriculture, culture and education, as well as advancing the nation’s international partnerships. The president was initially scheduled to arrive in time to celebrate
Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corp (IRGC) yesterday said the US faced a choice between an “impossible” military operation or a “bad deal” with Tehran, after US President Donald Trump disparaged Iran’s latest peace proposal. Negotiations between the two countries have been deadlocked since a ceasefire came into effect on April 8, with only one round of direct peace talks held so far. Iran’s Tasnim and Fars news agencies reported that Tehran had submitted a 14-point proposal to mediator Pakistan, but Trump was quick to cast doubt on it. “I will soon be reviewing the plan that Iran has just sent to us, but