The Economist yesterday said that “promises to fight for Taiwan” are an ineffective deterrent and could instead lead to a diplomatic fallout with Beijing, something that could be avoided by taking practical action to strengthen Taiwan’s self-defense capabilities.
The 180km-wide Taiwan Strait and the US military stand as the two main components deterring Beijing from attacking Taiwan, but Beijing is working to overcome both obstacles, the weekly said, adding that some US generals have said that Beijing could attack Taiwan by 2030.
The article, titled “How to deter China from attacking Taiwan,” says Taiwan, the US and its allies must learn the lessons of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — the most important of which is that “the threat is real.”
Photo: CNA
Instead of brainstorming for strategies during battle, it behooves the US and Taiwan to prepare now, the article said, adding: “The more prepared Taiwan is for the attack, the lesser the chances that China will take the risk.”
Taiwan has made the right decision in cutting down on its reliance on conscripts and moving to increase the capabilities of a professional standing military, the article said.
Nonetheless, Taiwan should continue to provide its eligible men — and perhaps women — with military training to create a capable homeland defense force, it added.
Taiwan should increase its defense spending, as its current expenditure of 2 percent of GDP is still on the low side, the article said, citing that Israel’s defense spending amounts to 5.6 percent of GDP.
Taiwan should not expect to match Beijing in defense expenditure or the scale of available forces to be committed and should, instead, make itself a “thorny problem” for its enemies, it said.
The overall defense concept proposed by the nation’s generals in 2017 is the right path, but unfortunately, it has yet to become widely accepted by Taiwan’s military, the article said.
The concept adopts large numbers of scattered and highly mobile defense weapon platforms that are easily covered, especially anti-surface and anti-air missiles, the article said.
However, this would mean that the military would have to give up fighter jets, ships and submarines, all of which are more expensive, it added.
While being an island means it is more difficult for an enemy force to mount a successful attack, it also exposes Taiwan to the risk of being difficult to provision for, which would mean that it must fight on its own for weeks, or even months, before US military aid — which is not guaranteed — could arrive.
The longer Taiwan can hold out in the event of an assault, the more help it stands to receive, just like Ukraine, the article said.
The US should consider elevating the level of political and military interactions with Taiwan, push for more arms deal packages and step up mutual exercises, an area in which Taiwan is sorely lacking, it said.
The US should also work with Japan and other regional allies to come up with plans and conduct exercises on how to react should Taiwan be cut off or is invaded.
Such actions would inevitably anger Beijing, and US President Joe Biden should cautiously maintain a degree of “strategic ambiguity,” the article said.
RISK REMAINS: An official said that with the US presidential elections so close, it is unclear if China would hold war games or keep its reaction to angry words The Ministry of National Defense said it was “on alert” as it detected a Chinese aircraft carrier group to Taiwan’s south yesterday amid concerns in Taiwan about the possibility of a new round of Chinese war games. The ministry said in a statement that a Chinese navy group led by the carrier Liaoning had entered waters near the Bashi Channel, which connects the South China Sea and the Pacific Ocean and separates Taiwan from the Philippines. It said the carrier group was expected to enter the Western Pacific. The military is keeping a close watch on developments and “exercising an
FIVE-YEAR WINDOW? A defense institute CEO said a timeline for a potential Chinese invasion was based on expected ‘tough measures’ when Xi Jinping seeks a new term Most Taiwanese are willing to defend the nation against a Chinese attack, but the majority believe Beijing is unlikely to invade within the next five years, a poll showed yesterday. The poll carried out last month was commissioned by the Institute for National Defense and Security Research, a Taipei-based think tank, and released ahead of Double Ten National Day today, when President William Lai (賴清德) is to deliver a speech. China maintains a near-daily military presence around Taiwan and has held three rounds of war games in the past two years. CIA Director William Burns last year said that Chinese President Xi Jinping
RESILIENCE: Once the system is operational, there would be no need to worry about the risks posed by disasters or other emergencies on communication systems, an official said Taiwan would have 24-hour access to low Earth orbit satellites by the end of this month through service provided by Eutelsat OneWeb as part of the nation’s effort to enhance signal resilience, a Chunghwa Telecom Co (中華電信) official said yesterday. Earlier this year the Ministry of Digital Affairs, which partnered with Chunghwa Telecom on a two-year project to boost signal resilience throughout the nation, said it reached a milestone when it made contact with OneWeb’s satellites half of the time. It expects to have the capability to maintain constant contact with the satellites and have nationwide coverage by the end
REACTION TO LAI: A former US official said William Lai took a step toward stability with his National Day speech and the question was how Beijing would respond US Secretary of State Antony Blinken yesterday warned China against taking any “provocative” action on Taiwan after Beijing’s reaction to President William Lai’s (賴清德) speech on Double Ten National Day on Thursday. Blinken, speaking in Laos after an ASEAN East Asia Summit, called the speech by Lai, in which he vowed to “resist annexation,” a “regular exercise.” “China should not use it in any fashion as a pretext for provocative actions,” Blinken told reporters. “On the contrary, we want to reinforce — and many other countries want to reinforce — the imperative of preserving the status quo, and neither party taking any
RSS