The Kaohsiung High Administrative Court yesterday handed down a ruling in a lawsuit between 14 residents and the Taitung County Government, overruling the government’s approval of the environmental impact assessment (EIA) report for the construction of the Miramar Resort Hotel at Shanyuan Bay (杉原灣).
In consideration of the impact that air, noise and water pollution resulting from the project would have on the residents’ health and safety, the court ordered that the EIA approval be revoked.
Saying that out of the eight EIA committee members who were present at the meeting during which the report was passed, only five were qualified for the reviewing of the case, thereby putting the attendance rate of committee members at lower than 50 percent, the court ruled that the passing of the report was in violation of the Environmental Impact Assessment Act (環境影響評估法) and therefore should be invalidated.
Photo: Chang Chia-ming, Taipei Times
In addition, the ruling determined that a pollution mitigation or prevention plan had not been proposed by the developer, Miramar Resort Hotel Co (美麗灣渡假村股份有限公司), at the time the county government conditionally passed the proposal. Therefore, the resolution breached of Article 8 of the act, which stipulates that cases that could create a profound impact on the environment should go through a second-phase EIA, it said.
The construction project dates to 2004, when the Taitung County Government signed a build-operate-transfer contract with the developer to construct a 6 hectare hotel complex on the beach.
Plaintiff Lin Shu-ling (林淑玲), an Amis Aboriginal and local resident, said she and her fellow residents had engaged in the legal battle with the county government for nearly 10 years.
“I would like to thank attorney Thomas Chan (詹順貴), who helped us to win the legal battle, and the judicial system for backing the side of justice for the environment,” Lin said. “I would also like to urge the Taitung County Government not to further appeal [the verdict]. Preserve Shanyuan Bay for Taitung residents and the Aborigines.”
The initial EIA report for the project was overruled by the Supreme Court in July 2008.
However, incorporating the Golden Coast Development Plan in its original proposal, the company submitted a second EIA report for review by the county government, which passed it conditionally in December 2012, prompting residents who opposed the project to file a lawsuit with the administrative court last year.
In a statement, Citizen of the Earth yesterday said the court’s verdict has proven that the resort is, by its very nature, an illegal structure. The group called on Taitung County Commissioner Justin Huang (黃健庭) to dismantle the hotel, whose construction was commenced illegally without an EIA being passed.
Meanwhile, Miramar Resort Hotel Co spokesperson Chu Ying-chou (朱膺州) expressed “frustration and regret” over the verdict, saying it not only affects the resort, but also residents who have been anticipating the completion of the facility.
Taitung County Government Secretary-General Chen Chin-hu (陳金虎) said the court’s ruling has left the government at a loss as to legal standards.
He said the EIA committee meeting in question was carried out in compliance with orders issued by previous verdicts and that three county government officials opted out as interested parties, but the ruling has excluded more officials from attending the meetings, including the directors-general of the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Environmental Protection and the Department of Tourism.
He said the county government has spared no effort when it comes to environmental protection, which is manifested in its requirement that a membrane hybrid system for tertiary wastewater treatment be present at the resort, to ensure that no wastewater would be discharged.
Additional reporting by Huang Ming-tang
‘NO SECURITY RISK’: The Railway Bureau reassured the public that the technicians’ activities were limited to technical guidance and did not involve sensitive systems The Railway Bureau yesterday said it had invited eight Chinese technicians to assist with an airport MRT construction project. The bureau issued the confirmation after an Internet user said Chinese nationals had entered the construction zone of Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport’s Terminal 3 project. They asked why “individuals from an enemy state” were allowed access to such a major national infrastructure project, which raised serious concerns over Taiwan’s industrial safety, sensitive systems and information security. The bureau’s Northern Region Engineering Branch Office said subcontractor Taiwan Handle Industrial Co (台灣手把工業) of the Taoyuan airport MRT’s “Contract No. CU05 Project A14 Station Civil, MEP &
The National Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology yesterday showcased its locally developed variants of the Vision 60 robotic patrol dog, which it plans to deploy on the nation’s outlying territories in the South China Sea. The variants were produced under the Joint Lab project — created by the institute and domestic companies — and assembled with domestically produced motors, lenses and artificial intelligence (AI) systems alongside licensed tech from the US, Missile and Rocket Systems Research Division deputy director Jen Kuo-kang (任國光) told the media event at a military base in Taipei’s Dazhi (大直) area. Taiwan has built up its strengths
NOT IMMEDIATE: Taiwan has a chance to appeal the proposed 10 percent tariff before it starts, while other countries face a 12.5 percent tariff from the trade office Taiwan is among 60 economies determined by the US to have failed to impose or enforce a ban on the importation of goods produced with forced labor, according to a notice released on Tuesday by the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR), which proposed imposing an additional 10 percent or more tariff on them. The USTR in a statement said that following an investigation, it had determined under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 that the failure of the 60 economies to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on the importation of goods produced with forced labor is
TIT-FOR-TAT: The US allegedly revoked the visa of a Chinese national working at Xinhua News Agency in the US in response to Beijing’s expulsion of Vivian Wang The Presidential Office yesterday condemned China for expelling a New York Times correspondent from Beijing following the newspaper’s interview with President William Lai (賴清德), saying the move highlighted Beijing’s suppression of press freedom and its threat to international news media. Taiwan has noted a series of recent incidents in which Beijing used similar tactics to “threaten and pressure international media outlets and journalists,” Presidential Office spokeswoman Karen Kuo (郭雅慧) said in a statement. “This concerns not only press freedom and freedom of expression, but also the safety of journalists, and Taiwan and relevant partners are paying close attention to the situation,” she