From ancient times until today, an enormous population has been a foundational way for China to project its strength. But anxiety about managing so many mouths has always loomed.
“China has a population of 600 million people, and we must never forget this fact,” Mao Zedong (毛澤東) said in 1957, shortly before setting off a calamitous famine.
China’s masses, though, are getting to be less massive. And that’s a problem.
Photo: AFP
Birth rate numbers released Monday, the lowest since Mao’s Communists established the People’s Republic in 1949, are the latest development in a millennia-long struggle in China, where producing children and refreshing the population of the young have been central to the national conversation since the country’s earliest days.
China’s population stands at 1.404 billion today, down 3 million from the previous year. And the central government’s challenge remains much as it has always been: to manage a citizenry that both enhances the country’s strength and claims enormous resources.
But various factors — policy, generational change and general evolution of the way people live — have officials concerned that there won’t be enough young Chinese people to build the tomorrow they want. This week’s numbers illustrate how complicated the problem remains.
ONE-CHILD POLICTY
It’s likely that urban Chinese of the 1980s could barely imagine the situation today — a society where the government is pushing families to have more — up to three — children.
The one-child policy, officially instituted in 1980 four years after Mao’s death, was designed to curb a growing population. It restricted Chinese couples to a single offspring and eventually, in many cases, punished them if they didn’t comply. The rationale: At that time, under Deng Xiaoping’s (鄧小平) policy of “reform and opening-up,” the country’s capital and resources couldn’t keep up with the population’s demands.
Beijing’s answer was to slow the population’s growth. Over time, that created a disproportionate amount of elderly people.
“China’s demographic transition, characterized by people getting old before becoming rich, creates challenges and opportunities,” the state-controlled newspaper China Daily said in 2024.
In the years after implementation, the one-child policy produced unintended consequences:
— A desire for sons gave rise to the hiding, mistreatment and sometimes outright killing of baby girls, especially in rural areas.
— Among better-off families in cities — where the policy was primarily aimed — it also gave rise to millions of households in which an only child became the focus of attention, creating a generation of what some call “little emperors.”
— Coupled with recent loosening of the hukou, or household registration, system that limits where Chinese people can live within their country, many only children wound up living far from their parents, promoting social ills like loneliness and alienation.
— Population growth slowed to a crawl, leading in recent years to numbers like Monday’s.
“China’s one-child policy will be remembered as one of the costliest lessons of misguided public policymaking,” the Brookings Institution said in a 2016 report shortly after the policy was abolished. It also blamed “a social discourse that has erroneously blamed population growth for virtually all the country’s social and economic problems.”
TRYING TO TURN THE TIDE
One of China’s most ancient precepts is that there are three ways to disrespect your parents and ancestors — and not having offspring is one of them. In that respect, limiting population growth ran counter to long-established cultural norms and traditions.
As the one-child policy ebbed, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) rejuvenated that age-old notion. He started to publicly liken the population to Chinese power once again — or, as he put it, a “great wall of steel forged by over 1.4 billion Chinese people.”
It doesn’t help that India surpassed China in population in 2023. The on-again, off-again rival and neighbor of China has vied of late to be the leader of the Global South, a mantle China is pursuing as well as an alternative to what it considers Western “hegemony.” That’s a factor that makes China’s population both an internal and an international issue.
So the country has taken some measures to, for lack of a better term, reduce the friction. Condoms are taxed no more. Neither are day care centers. Even matchmakers, a cornerstone of traditional Chinese culture, also now find themselves doing their work tax-free.
More systemically, plans for the nation’s next five-year plan for development, beginning this year, include an aim to “encourage positive views on marriage and childbearing” in addition to doubling down on incentives for increasing birth rates and reducing the costs of having and raising children. The official Xinhua News Agency last month said that the initiatives, taken together, represent “a plan to make childbirth essentially free.”
In the end, the question is whether the China of tradition endures, or whether the realities of decades of Chinese policy and modern global life continue to overwrite it. Can both co-exist? When you’re talking about 1.4 billion people, it’s hard to say.
Mao might offer some guidance here. When the Great Helmsman made that comment in 1957, it emerged in a work whose title succinctly summed up the complex problem China faces — both then and now. Its name: “On the Correct Handling of Contradictions Among the People.”
Growing up in a rural, religious community in western Canada, Kyle McCarthy loved hockey, but once he came out at 19, he quit, convinced being openly gay and an active player was untenable. So the 32-year-old says he is “very surprised” by the runaway success of Heated Rivalry, a Canadian-made series about the romance between two closeted gay players in a sport that has historically made gay men feel unwelcome. Ben Baby, the 43-year-old commissioner of the Toronto Gay Hockey Association (TGHA), calls the success of the show — which has catapulted its young lead actors to stardom -- “shocking,” and says
The 2018 nine-in-one local elections were a wild ride that no one saw coming. Entering that year, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was demoralized and in disarray — and fearing an existential crisis. By the end of the year, the party was riding high and swept most of the country in a landslide, including toppling the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) in their Kaohsiung stronghold. Could something like that happen again on the DPP side in this year’s nine-in-one elections? The short answer is not exactly; the conditions were very specific. However, it does illustrate how swiftly every assumption early in an
Inside an ordinary-looking townhouse on a narrow road in central Kaohsiung, Tsai A-li (蔡阿李) raised her three children alone for 15 years. As far as the children knew, their father was away working in the US. They were kept in the dark for as long as possible by their mother, for the truth was perhaps too sad and unjust for their young minds to bear. The family home of White Terror victim Ko Chi-hua (柯旗化) is now open to the public. Admission is free and it is just a short walk from the Kaohsiung train station. Walk two blocks south along Jhongshan
Francis William White, an Englishman who late in the 1860s served as Commissioner of the Imperial Customs Service in Tainan, published the tale of a jaunt he took one winter in 1868: A visit to the interior of south Formosa (1870). White’s journey took him into the mountains, where he mused on the difficult terrain and the ease with which his little group could be ambushed in the crags and dense vegetation. At one point he stays at the house of a local near a stream on the border of indigenous territory: “Their matchlocks, which were kept in excellent order,