Despite plummeting relations between Beijing and Washington, Shanghai resident Huang is determined that her daughter will complete her costly education in the US.
Even as the two sides have spent much of this year locked in a blistering trade row, US schools and universities remain hugely popular with parents who are chasing what they see as better opportunities and an international outlook for their children. They will be among many hoping an expected meeting between presidents Donald Trump and Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea today — their first encounter since the former’s return to the White House — could pave the way to stabilizing ties.
“Even though there’s a lot of drama going on right now... this is just temporary,” Huang said. “This is something I firmly believe in.”
Photo: AFP
Her 17-year-old daughter has been enrolled in high school in the US for three years and is hoping to study computer science at university there. Trump’s mercurial nature and his “America First” policies have spooked some of Huang’s friends, who are considering sending their children to Europe or Australia instead. But for Huang, the benefits of a US education far outweigh the cons.
“We feel that the United States is a country that can provide our child with more opportunities, and education is definitely more diverse,” said Huang, who did not give her full name due to privacy concerns.
There is a hefty price tag, though, with Huang estimating she currently pays more than US$100,000 a year in education and living expenses.
Photo: AFP
WEALTHIEST PARENTS ‘NOT WORRIED’
Young Chinese people have long been crucial to US universities’ balance sheets. After Indians, they made up the second-largest nationality of international students for the 2023-24 academic year, according to the Institute of International Education. But Trump has introduced policies aimed both at curbing immigration and weakening universities, which he sees as a power base of the left.
Photo: AP
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in May that Washington would “aggressively revoke visas for Chinese students.” However, just a few months later, Trump said the country was going to allow 600,000 Chinese students to “come in.” The uncertainty doesn’t seem to have put off many Chinese parents, according to Godot Han, who works for a Beijing tutoring agency. Her wealthiest clients, especially, “have not been worried.”
They “won’t just read a single news article and then suddenly make changes” to long-held plans, she said. Teachers at her school, part of a thriving domestic industry, prepare some 200 Chinese students yearly for the tests needed for US university admission. A one-on-one session ranges from US$112 to US$210 an hour, with some students attending several a day.
Some parents worry for their children’s safety, because of school shootings in the US and the policies of the Trump administration.
But many have just always “had that kind of American dream,” Han said.
NEVER A ‘HONEYMOON PERIOD’
The enduring appeal of a US education rests on its “perceived quality and historical reputation,” said Dylan Loh from Singapore’s Nanyang Technological University.
“This reputation and prestige are longstanding and despite the obvious difficulties, still remain and will remain for a long time,” he said.
Another parent, Ping Jiaqi, said that US universities could help foster “independent thinking” in his 17-year-old daughter, who is studying at an international high school in China’s eastern Zhejiang province. She attended summer school at Brown University last year and visited several other campuses in the US, hoping to move there for university.
Her father expects her entire tertiary education will cost more than US$400,000. Ping, who runs an education consultancy for Chinese students hoping to study abroad, said daily life for his US-based friends and students “hasn’t been affected much” by Trump.
“When I think about it, US-China relations haven’t really been good at any point over the past decade,” he said.
“There was never really a honeymoon period.”
The small platform at Duoliang Train Station in Taitung County’s Taimali Township (太麻里) served villagers from 1992 to 2006, but was eventually shut down due to lack of use. Just 10 years later, the abandoned train station had become widely known as the most beautiful station in Taiwan, and visitors were so frequent that the village had to start restricting traffic. Nowadays, Duoliang Village (多良) is known as a bit of a tourist trap, with a mandatory, albeit modest, admission fee of NT$10 giving access to a crowded lane of vendors with a mediocre view of the ocean and the trains
For many people, Bilingual Nation 2030 begins and ends in the classroom. Since the policy was launched in 2018, the debate has centered on students, teachers and the pressure placed on schools. Yet the policy was never solely about English education. The government’s official plan also calls for bilingualization in Taiwan’s government services, laws and regulations, and living environment. The goal is to make Taiwan more inclusive and accessible to international enterprises and talent and better prepared for global economic and trade conditions. After eight years, that grand vision is due for a pulse check. RULES THAT CAN BE READ For Harper Chen (陳虹宇), an adviser
Traditionally, indigenous people in Taiwan’s mountains practice swidden cultivation, or “slash and burn” agriculture, a practice common in human history. According to a 2016 research article in the International Journal of Environmental Sustainability, among the Atayal people, this began with a search for suitable forested slopeland. The trees are burnt for fertilizer and the land cleared of stones. The stones and wood are then piled up to make fences, while both dead and standing trees are retained on the plot. The fences are used to grow climbing crops like squash and beans. The plot itself supports farming for three years.
President William Lai (賴清德) on Nov. 25 last year announced in a Washington Post op-ed that “my government will introduce a historic US$40 billion supplementary defense budget, an investment that underscores our commitment to defending Taiwan’s democracy.” Lai promised “significant new arms acquisitions from the United States” and to “invest in cutting-edge technologies and expand Taiwan’s defense industrial base,” to “bolster deterrence by inserting greater costs and uncertainties into Beijing’s decision-making on the use of force.” Announcing it in the Washington Post was a strategic gamble, both geopolitically and domestically, with Taiwan’s international credibility at stake. But Lai’s message was exactly