Despite plummeting relations between Beijing and Washington, Shanghai resident Huang is determined that her daughter will complete her costly education in the US.
Even as the two sides have spent much of this year locked in a blistering trade row, US schools and universities remain hugely popular with parents who are chasing what they see as better opportunities and an international outlook for their children. They will be among many hoping an expected meeting between presidents Donald Trump and Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea today — their first encounter since the former’s return to the White House — could pave the way to stabilizing ties.
“Even though there’s a lot of drama going on right now... this is just temporary,” Huang said. “This is something I firmly believe in.”
Photo: AFP
Her 17-year-old daughter has been enrolled in high school in the US for three years and is hoping to study computer science at university there. Trump’s mercurial nature and his “America First” policies have spooked some of Huang’s friends, who are considering sending their children to Europe or Australia instead. But for Huang, the benefits of a US education far outweigh the cons.
“We feel that the United States is a country that can provide our child with more opportunities, and education is definitely more diverse,” said Huang, who did not give her full name due to privacy concerns.
There is a hefty price tag, though, with Huang estimating she currently pays more than US$100,000 a year in education and living expenses.
Photo: AFP
WEALTHIEST PARENTS ‘NOT WORRIED’
Young Chinese people have long been crucial to US universities’ balance sheets. After Indians, they made up the second-largest nationality of international students for the 2023-24 academic year, according to the Institute of International Education. But Trump has introduced policies aimed both at curbing immigration and weakening universities, which he sees as a power base of the left.
Photo: AP
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in May that Washington would “aggressively revoke visas for Chinese students.” However, just a few months later, Trump said the country was going to allow 600,000 Chinese students to “come in.” The uncertainty doesn’t seem to have put off many Chinese parents, according to Godot Han, who works for a Beijing tutoring agency. Her wealthiest clients, especially, “have not been worried.”
They “won’t just read a single news article and then suddenly make changes” to long-held plans, she said. Teachers at her school, part of a thriving domestic industry, prepare some 200 Chinese students yearly for the tests needed for US university admission. A one-on-one session ranges from US$112 to US$210 an hour, with some students attending several a day.
Some parents worry for their children’s safety, because of school shootings in the US and the policies of the Trump administration.
But many have just always “had that kind of American dream,” Han said.
NEVER A ‘HONEYMOON PERIOD’
The enduring appeal of a US education rests on its “perceived quality and historical reputation,” said Dylan Loh from Singapore’s Nanyang Technological University.
“This reputation and prestige are longstanding and despite the obvious difficulties, still remain and will remain for a long time,” he said.
Another parent, Ping Jiaqi, said that US universities could help foster “independent thinking” in his 17-year-old daughter, who is studying at an international high school in China’s eastern Zhejiang province. She attended summer school at Brown University last year and visited several other campuses in the US, hoping to move there for university.
Her father expects her entire tertiary education will cost more than US$400,000. Ping, who runs an education consultancy for Chinese students hoping to study abroad, said daily life for his US-based friends and students “hasn’t been affected much” by Trump.
“When I think about it, US-China relations haven’t really been good at any point over the past decade,” he said.
“There was never really a honeymoon period.”
Oct. 27 to Nov. 2 Over a breakfast of soymilk and fried dough costing less than NT$400, seven officials and engineers agreed on a NT$400 million plan — unaware that it would mark the beginning of Taiwan’s semiconductor empire. It was a cold February morning in 1974. Gathered at the unassuming shop were Economics minister Sun Yun-hsuan (孫運璿), director-general of Transportation and Communications Kao Yu-shu (高玉樹), Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) president Wang Chao-chen (王兆振), Telecommunications Laboratories director Kang Pao-huang (康寶煌), Executive Yuan secretary-general Fei Hua (費驊), director-general of Telecommunications Fang Hsien-chi (方賢齊) and Radio Corporation of America (RCA) Laboratories director Pan
The consensus on the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chair race is that Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) ran a populist, ideological back-to-basics campaign and soundly defeated former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), the candidate backed by the big institutional players. Cheng tapped into a wave of popular enthusiasm within the KMT, while the institutional players’ get-out-the-vote abilities fell flat, suggesting their power has weakened significantly. Yet, a closer look at the race paints a more complicated picture, raising questions about some analysts’ conclusions, including my own. TURNOUT Here is a surprising statistic: Turnout was 130,678, or 39.46 percent of the 331,145 eligible party
The classic warmth of a good old-fashioned izakaya beckons you in, all cozy nooks and dark wood finishes, as tables order a third round and waiters sling tapas-sized bites and assorted — sometimes unidentifiable — skewered meats. But there’s a romantic hush about this Ximending (西門町) hotspot, with cocktails savored, plating elegant and never rushed and daters and diners lit by candlelight and chandelier. Each chair is mismatched and the assorted tables appear to be the fanciest picks from a nearby flea market. A naked sewing mannequin stands in a dimly lit corner, adorned with antique mirrors and draped foliage
President William Lai (賴清德) has championed Taiwan as an “AI Island” — an artificial intelligence (AI) hub powering the global tech economy. But without major shifts in talent, funding and strategic direction, this vision risks becoming a static fortress: indispensable, yet immobile and vulnerable. It’s time to reframe Taiwan’s ambition. Time to move from a resource-rich AI island to an AI Armada. Why change metaphors? Because choosing the right metaphor shapes both understanding and strategy. The “AI Island” frames our national ambition as a static fortress that, while valuable, is still vulnerable and reactive. Shifting our metaphor to an “AI Armada”
RSS