Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), media mogul, television personality and former vice presidential candidate, on Saturday rode to the rescue of his long-time comrade, former Taipei Mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) in his lackluster bid to win the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) party chair election.
In a post on Facebook on Thursday last week, Hau claimed to be the victim of a cyberwarfare campaign. He said that according to public relations firms he had commissioned to investigate, they estimated it must have cost “nearly NT$100 million” (US$3.3 million).
“The attacks I received exceeded the so-called Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) “1450” (internet army)’s battle strength,” he said, and questioned: “Is it mobilized by candidates inside our party?”
Photo: Chen Yi-kuan, Taipei Times
“What I worry about most is that there are too many foreign IP addresses,” he added.
The term he used for “foreign” literally means “outside our borders” (境外), which, according to his “one China” ideology, could include Communist China.
His post came across as pre-emptively casting about for outside forces to pin the blame on if he loses. Initially, the response was muted; it was hard to know what to make of such vague, conspiratorial-sounding insinuations.
Photo: Fang Pin-chao, Taipei Times
Jaw gave the insinuations legs, calling out China explicitly for interfering in the KMT chair election and sharing numbers and specific allegations to make the case. Among his data points, he claimed that of the 1790 posts on TikTok created in the last month on the KMT chair race, 58 percent were devoted to popular frontrunner Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文).
He described fresh IP addresses and YouTube channels allegedly created within three weeks of Hau declaring his run to spread AI content to attack him. Hau has since said that this has been “confirmed by police,” and called on them to investigate their origin.
Jaw trotted out an obviously AI-created video of Hau on stage kissing KMT Taipei City Councilor Liu Tsai-wei (柳采葳), who has since filed a lawsuit, stating she felt “disgusted” and “grieved.” He also ignited discussion across the political spectrum by calling for a national security investigation.
JAW PROVOKES TALK
This provoked outrage within the KMT that their election was being interfered with by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The DPP reaction was a mixture of exasperation, bemusement and a bit sarcastic in an eye-rolling “oh, so you’re finally figuring out the CCP meddles in our elections” sort of way. They pointed out that some of the legal revisions they have been proposing are intended to try to stop this sort of cognitive warfare, and the KMT had blocked them.
That the CCP has been trying to influence elections in Taiwan is not a surprise to anyone, but on the KMT side, it seems less serious because much of it sounds reasonable and could be homegrown — after all, it is often their own talking points being amplified.
The idea that the CCP would interfere in their own internal chair election genuinely outraged many in the KMT. By definition, the KMT is pro-China, but being pro-CCP is another matter. Even those who are more pro-CCP in the party were undoubtedly upset at the possibility that they would do something so blatantly stupid.
A candidate close to the CCP, Chang Ya-chung (張亞中) said he had faith the “Chinese side” would not interfere.
Unsurprisingly, Jaw’s move shifted the focus and pressure to Cheng — though Jaw has made clear he was not aiming at her. She said that it was not her impression that there was any interference and that this was a phenomenon of today’s AI internet era. She dismissed this as a national security issue.
BUT WHY?
There is no proof of CCP interference, and Cheng may be right. On the other hand, the CCP has a long history of cognitive warfare stretching back to their successful effort to bring down the KMT in the Chinese Civil War.
But why would the CCP take such a risk?
Tinkering in the election would be less risky and more par for the course. Though they can easily afford it, splashing out nearly NT$100 million, as Hau alleges, would inevitably raise — ahem — red flags.
The easiest and cheapest way for the CCP to conquer Taiwan is to integrate to the point where Taiwan is effectively a vassal state, then wear down resistance to formalizing the relationship through negotiation. Those most amenable to this strategy are more likely to back the KMT, and all of the KMT candidates are promoting more economic integration, peaceful exchanges and a willingness to meet with Chinese leaders.
Cheng is almost certainly Beijing’s preferred candidate. She has previously supported former KMT Chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu’s (洪秀柱) “one China, same interpretation” formula and last Wednesday vowed to make every Taiwanese “proud to call themselves Chinese.” In response, Hau identified himself as both Taiwanese and Chinese, specifying that his “China” is the Republic of China and explained his stance that cultural Chinese identity stems from “the Chinese root of Taiwanese culture,” which he said should not be conflated with political allegiance.
Hau’s foreign policy platform is (roughly translated) “pro-US but not kneeling to the US, peaceful towards China but not sucking up to the CCP, friendly to Japan but not fawning over Japan” (親美不跪美、和中不舔共、友日不媚日). In response, Cheng reiterated her support for “one China.”
Though Hau’s language is tougher than Cheng’s, he has always been for “reunification.” Cheng’s timeline would likely be smoother and faster if she got her way, but both share the same basic ideology.
Additionally, the KMT chair will likely be eclipsed by their presidential candidate in 2027 ahead of the 2028 national elections, and will be far more consequential ideologically and more powerful if the KMT regains power.
If they are meddling in this election, is it because they are growing impatient and want someone like Cheng to speed things along? Are they afraid Hau is tougher and more independent than he appears against the CCP?
This would not be a smart move by the CCP. KMT members are part of a democratic party, and do not take kindly to outside interference. Why would the CCP risk driving the KMT and DPP towards a consensus on national security?
It cannot be ruled out the CCP is doing this, hamfisted attempts to meddle in democracies they do not fully understand have happened before.
It also cannot be ruled out that Cheng is right, this is just the way it is in the AI era. She is the candidate drawing younger, more enthusiastic followers who would be far more likely to produce AI-generated content to support her.
The “kissing” video used by Jaw as proof of a nefarious plot has the opposite effect if one knows what is going on. Like photo filters before them, AI effects making two people kiss are common in many recent default AI effect suites in apps, usually alongside other standardized effects to make people fly like superheroes, being swarmed by puppies, or even being hugged by an AI Jesus.
This smells like someone simply ran the image through a standard AI effect app to be funny, rather than a well-thought-out smear campaign. If Hau had really done this on a crowded stage in front of an audience, we would know about it.
On the other hand, if Jaw and Hau’s allegations that many of the IP addresses and YouTube channels are emanating out of China, then that would strongly suggest that their claims have some merit.
There is another possibility: That this was cleverly crafted by Jaw and Hau to rally support.
Jaw’s calls for a national security investigation are warranted, and hopefully, the KMT will give its full support to strengthening the system to secure all of Taiwan’s elections.
Donovan’s Deep Dives is a regular column by Courtney Donovan Smith (石東文) who writes in-depth analysis on everything about Taiwan’s political scene and geopolitics. Donovan is also the central Taiwan correspondent at ICRT FM100 Radio News, co-publisher of Compass Magazine, co-founder Taiwan Report (report.tw) and former chair of the Taichung American Chamber of Commerce. Follow him on X: @donovan_smith.
Recently the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and its Mini-Me partner in the legislature, the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), have been arguing that construction of chip fabs in the US by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) is little more than stripping Taiwan of its assets. For example, KMT Legislative Caucus First Deputy Secretary-General Lin Pei-hsiang (林沛祥) in January said that “This is not ‘reciprocal cooperation’ ... but a substantial hollowing out of our country.” Similarly, former TPP Chair Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) contended it constitutes “selling Taiwan out to the United States.” The two pro-China parties are proposing a bill that
March 9 to March 15 “This land produced no horses,” Qing Dynasty envoy Yu Yung-ho (郁永河) observed when he visited Taiwan in 1697. He didn’t mean that there were no horses at all; it was just difficult to transport them across the sea and raise them in the hot and humid climate. “Although 10,000 soldiers were stationed here, the camps had fewer than 1,000 horses,” Yu added. Starting from the Dutch in the 1600s, each foreign regime brought horses to Taiwan. But they remained rare animals, typically only owned by the government or
Institutions signalling a fresh beginning and new spirit often adopt new slogans, symbols and marketing materials, and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is no exception. Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), soon after taking office as KMT chair, released a new slogan that plays on the party’s acronym: “Kind Mindfulness Team.” The party recently released a graphic prominently featuring the red, white and blue of the flag with a Chinese slogan “establishing peace, blessings and fortune marching forth” (締造和平,幸福前行). One part of the graphic also features two hands in blue and white grasping olive branches in a stylized shape of Taiwan. Bonus points for
“M yeolgong jajangmyeon (anti-communism zhajiangmian, 滅共炸醬麵), let’s all shout together — myeolgong!” a chef at a Chinese restaurant in Dongtan, located about 35km south of Seoul, South Korea, calls out before serving a bowl of Korean-style zhajiangmian —black bean noodles. Diners repeat the phrase before tucking in. This political-themed restaurant, named Myeolgong Banjeom (滅共飯館, “anti-communism restaurant”), is operated by a single person and does not take reservations; therefore long queues form regularly outside, and most customers appear sympathetic to its political theme. Photos of conservative public figures hang on the walls, alongside political slogans and poems written in Chinese characters; South
RSS