It’s late at night, and you have been stewing all day about something your partner did to annoy you. The time to resolve it is now because, as everyone knows, you should never go to bed angry, right?
Though it’s conventional wisdom, many relationship experts say sticking to such a rule is counterproductive. It may even harm the relationship.
“It’s completely wrong,” said Samantha Whiten, a clinical psychologist in Maryland. “All it does is make sure that people are fighting when they’re tired.”
Photo: AFP
Instead, couples can learn habits that help them get rest while boosting the relationship long term.
NO ONE WANTS TO GO TO BED ANGRY
It’s understandable to want to discuss a problem before letting it fester, Whiten said, but it’s unrealistic to expect conflicts to be wrapped up quickly and lovingly before drifting off to sleep.
“That sounds nice,” she said. “That’s like a fairy tale, though.”
Some sources attribute the origin of the phrase to the New Testament book of Ephesians. Translations vary, but it’s some version of: “Be angry but do not sin; do not let the sun set on your anger.”
The trouble is, couples shouldn’t fight when they are “emotionally dysregulated,” Whiten said. She referred to the acronym HALT, a common reminder in therapy that people should avoid serious discussions when hungry, angry, lonely or tired. Many people also drink alcohol at night, which doesn’t help create a calm environment.
“They are more likely to say and do things impulsively that they may regret,” she said.
WHAT SHOULD YOU DO INSTEAD?
Discussing problems at night might seem easiest because it’s when your partner is most available, said Sabrina Romanoff, a clinical psychologist in New York City.
But it’s better to acknowledge that something needs to be discussed, take a pause, and set a time to come back to it, she said. That could mean having lunch or coffee together the next day, or any time you’re not rushing out the door.
The key is to follow through.
“It speaks to a skill, to trust that your partner is really going to return to this thing that’s really important to you,” Romanoff said, adding that most couples have to practice that.
It’s also about understanding your partner and being empathetic to what each of you needs. When one partner needs space, it’s incumbent on the other person not to interpret that space as rejection, Romanoff said.
What’s the difference between a pause and avoiding?
Whiten said many couples in her practice have at least one person who feels they won’t be able to sleep until they resolve a fight. That’s often a sign of anxiety and a discomfort with uncertainty.
“People need to individually learn how they can regulate themselves and tell themselves it’s OK,” she said. “The idea of being able to self-soothe is really key.”
The reverse — avoidance — is no better. Many people might need space to process an argument, but they’re obliged to come back later to their partner to address the topic.
The goal is that both people feel secure enough to acknowledge the disagreement, remember their relationship is more important than one argument, and agree to talk about it later, Whiten said. “When people can learn to do that, it’s really transformative.”
STOP ARGUMENTS BEFORE THEY START
Romanoff suggested that couples establish regular check-ins. They don’t have to talk about the worst problems in their lives at a given point, but they should make a habit of small gestures of communication.
Even regularly asking how your partner’s day went creates a kind of scaffolding of emotional safety, she said. It creates the space to address problems.
When there is an issue, use “I” statements, be clear about what you need, and try to create a plan for how the other person can deliver, she said. A request posed at an appropriate time will often be better received.
“Timing is everything when it comes to communication,” she said.
The small platform at Duoliang Train Station in Taitung County’s Taimali Township (太麻里) served villagers from 1992 to 2006, but was eventually shut down due to lack of use. Just 10 years later, the abandoned train station had become widely known as the most beautiful station in Taiwan, and visitors were so frequent that the village had to start restricting traffic. Nowadays, Duoliang Village (多良) is known as a bit of a tourist trap, with a mandatory, albeit modest, admission fee of NT$10 giving access to a crowded lane of vendors with a mediocre view of the ocean and the trains
For many people, Bilingual Nation 2030 begins and ends in the classroom. Since the policy was launched in 2018, the debate has centered on students, teachers and the pressure placed on schools. Yet the policy was never solely about English education. The government’s official plan also calls for bilingualization in Taiwan’s government services, laws and regulations, and living environment. The goal is to make Taiwan more inclusive and accessible to international enterprises and talent and better prepared for global economic and trade conditions. After eight years, that grand vision is due for a pulse check. RULES THAT CAN BE READ For Harper Chen (陳虹宇), an adviser
Traditionally, indigenous people in Taiwan’s mountains practice swidden cultivation, or “slash and burn” agriculture, a practice common in human history. According to a 2016 research article in the International Journal of Environmental Sustainability, among the Atayal people, this began with a search for suitable forested slopeland. The trees are burnt for fertilizer and the land cleared of stones. The stones and wood are then piled up to make fences, while both dead and standing trees are retained on the plot. The fences are used to grow climbing crops like squash and beans. The plot itself supports farming for three years.
President William Lai (賴清德) on Nov. 25 last year announced in a Washington Post op-ed that “my government will introduce a historic US$40 billion supplementary defense budget, an investment that underscores our commitment to defending Taiwan’s democracy.” Lai promised “significant new arms acquisitions from the United States” and to “invest in cutting-edge technologies and expand Taiwan’s defense industrial base,” to “bolster deterrence by inserting greater costs and uncertainties into Beijing’s decision-making on the use of force.” Announcing it in the Washington Post was a strategic gamble, both geopolitically and domestically, with Taiwan’s international credibility at stake. But Lai’s message was exactly
RSS