Students huddle together in the corridor, chatter filling the air on a break between classes at a school in Finland, where mobile phones have been banned since school resumed last month.
At Kungsvagens Skola for students aged 13 to 15 in Sipoo, northeast of Helsinki, teachers collect students’ phones in the morning and lock them in a storage room until the end of the school day.
Principal Maria Tallberg said the transition to a phone-free school had “exceeded expectations.”
Photo: AFP
“Of course, they (students) grumbled a bit in the beginning, especially since they can’t use them during breaks, but they also understand why, deep down,” Tallberg said. “Many have also said they were not aware they were so addicted to their phones.”
The new law banning phones during class-time came into force on Aug. 1 across Finland, a country long known for its high-quality education. Several municipalities and individual schools have now chosen to extend the ban to breaks as well.
Previously, the Finnish National Agency for Education had recommended that schools restrict the use of mobile phones in classrooms. The ban comes amid a global debate on how smartphone use affects not only mental and overall health, but also learning and education.
Reports, including one from UNESCO in 2023, have warned that phones in the classroom can hamper learning by causing distraction.
Several countries have adopted similar restrictions, including Taiwan, South Korea, Italy, the Netherlands and France.
’VERY DIFFERENT’
Annika Railila, a chemistry teacher at Kungsvagens Skola, said classrooms were now calmer and students less distracted.
“Before, we had to remind them almost every lesson that the phone stays in their bag and you don’t use it during the lessons.”
Students also socialize more during breaks now, she said.
“You actually get to see their eyes and faces, which is a lot nicer than to say hello to someone who’s looking at the screen,” she added.
Fifteen-year-old Kie Lindfors described the school environment as “very different.”
“I talk more with people and there is a room in the school where there are board games and stuff so that’s been lots of fun on recess, going there to play,” he said.
His classmate Lotta Knapas felt the school had become “a lot more noisy” and “wild.”
“I understand that we can’t use them in lessons but I think it is kind of dumb they take them away from us for the whole day,” she said.
Meanwhile, Oscar Ingman, 14, feared some students might feel more lonely.
“I see more people being more sociable, more people talking and so on. But I also do see occasionally some people just sitting alone in a corridor,” he said.
The school aimed to organize activities to prevent kids from having nothing to do, the principal said, noting that Internet bullying at the school had already decreased.
“Students used to take pictures and film both during lessons and a lot on breaks, and we often had to investigate when video clips were shared everywhere,” said Tallberg.
REVERSE THE TREND
Finland’s new law was adopted after education scores plunged, Finnish Education Minister Anders Adlercreutz said.
“We have noticed in Finland, as in many other countries, that our reading and mathematic skills have deteriorated and the Finnish approach is to think about how we can create more space for learning and teaching,” Adlercreutz said. “Removing disturbing elements from the classroom helps.”
The latest results from the OECD’s Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) from 2022 showed Finnish 15-year-olds’ skills in mathematics, reading comprehension and science had declined.
Finland nonetheless still ranked above the OECD average for all subjects among the 38 member countries.
The phone ban did not mean schools were exiting the digital world, Adlercreutz insisted.
“It is important for children to have physical books, but they also need to be digitally literate,” he said.
“But in a world that is moving so fast, perhaps the role of schools is also to teach slowness, to be a place where you have to force yourself to read longer texts, focus on one thing, and work purposefully toward a long-term goal.”
Recently the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and its Mini-Me partner in the legislature, the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), have been arguing that construction of chip fabs in the US by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) is little more than stripping Taiwan of its assets. For example, KMT Legislative Caucus First Deputy Secretary-General Lin Pei-hsiang (林沛祥) in January said that “This is not ‘reciprocal cooperation’ ... but a substantial hollowing out of our country.” Similarly, former TPP Chair Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) contended it constitutes “selling Taiwan out to the United States.” The two pro-China parties are proposing a bill that
March 9 to March 15 “This land produced no horses,” Qing Dynasty envoy Yu Yung-ho (郁永河) observed when he visited Taiwan in 1697. He didn’t mean that there were no horses at all; it was just difficult to transport them across the sea and raise them in the hot and humid climate. “Although 10,000 soldiers were stationed here, the camps had fewer than 1,000 horses,” Yu added. Starting from the Dutch in the 1600s, each foreign regime brought horses to Taiwan. But they remained rare animals, typically only owned by the government or
Institutions signalling a fresh beginning and new spirit often adopt new slogans, symbols and marketing materials, and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is no exception. Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), soon after taking office as KMT chair, released a new slogan that plays on the party’s acronym: “Kind Mindfulness Team.” The party recently released a graphic prominently featuring the red, white and blue of the flag with a Chinese slogan “establishing peace, blessings and fortune marching forth” (締造和平,幸福前行). One part of the graphic also features two hands in blue and white grasping olive branches in a stylized shape of Taiwan. Bonus points for
Last month, media outlets including the BBC World Service and Bloomberg reported that China’s greenhouse gas emissions are currently flat or falling, and that the economic giant appears to be on course to comfortably meet Beijing’s stated goal that total emissions will peak no later than 2030. China is by far and away the world’s biggest emitter of greenhouse gases, generating more carbon dioxide than the US and the EU combined. As the BBC pointed out in their Feb. 12 report, “what happens in China literally could change the world’s weather.” Any drop in total emissions is good news, of course. By