Late last month Philippines Foreign Affairs Secretary Theresa Lazaro told the Philippine Senate that the nation has sufficient funds to evacuate the nearly 170,000 Filipino residents in Taiwan, 84 percent of whom are migrant workers, in the event of war. Agencies have been exploring evacuation scenarios since early this year, she said. She also observed that since the Philippines has only limited ships, the government is consulting security agencies for alternatives.
Filipinos are a distant third in overall migrant worker population. Indonesia has over 248,000 workers, followed by roughly 240,000 Vietnamese. It should be noted that there are another 170,000 Vietnamese in Taiwan married to locals. Hence, roughly 1 in every 33 Taiwanese residents is southeast Asian.
Photo: AFP
HOT WAR
Foreign Minister Lazaro’s testimony was a brave speech, intended to reassure, but it is a fantasy. Everyone in Taiwan will be trapped when the war begins. No one is getting out.
It is difficult to imagine that in the chaos of a hot war, with air and sea combat taking place across the South China Sea and in the Bashi Channel between Taiwan and Luzon, how 170,000 Filipinos are going to be evacuated. It is impossible to imagine how another half million or more Vietnamese and Indonesians are going to be evacuated — all at the same time as the Filipinos, along with the tens of thousands of Americans, Canadians, Japanese and other nationalities. Of course, hundreds of thousands of Taiwanese will be attempting to flee as well. Further, the Japanese will also be removing the roughly 120,000 civilians who live on the Japanese-owned islands east of Taiwan in the event of war with China, as they announced back in March of this year. Air and sealift to Japan will be at a premium.
Photo: EPA
Many readers have probably evolved some hazy vision of escape when the fighting begins. A flight out? Most of these fantasies are based on having weeks or months of warning. Not anymore. As incursions by the forces of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) into local air and sea space have become normalized, the warning period has shrunk. At a panel discussion organized by Taiwan Thinktank last week, military expert Kao Chih-jung (高志榮) said that the PRC will probably take up to two weeks to prepare its forces for an invasion.
Two weeks, perhaps even less. Imagine the chaos at Taiwan’s airports, which are inevitable targets of bombardment. A pro-Ukraine hacker group in July took down Aeroflot’s computer systems, crippling flights across Russia. Recall that in 2022 during then US House of Representatives speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taiwan, hackers from Russia and the PRC took control of screens across Taiwan, from 7-11s to the government, paralyzing them. Power outages will be easy for the PRC to arrange. In a real war, organized aviation in Taiwan will cease to exist hours, perhaps days, before the first drones and missiles hit the aircraft and equipment at Taiwan’s airports.
Well ok, the reader’s hazy fantasy might run, there are still fishing boats. Nope. Taiwan’s distant water fleet is almost entirely crewed by migrant workers, and their captains, usually far from Taiwan, will not return to enter a combat zone. The small fishing craft that ply the waters off Taiwan have a lower proportion of migrant workers, but they too will largely cease functioning as their crews melt away. They aren’t paid enough to run the gauntlet of drones and PRC ships. Moreover, fishing boats use fuels that will be restricted in the event of war, while sealift capable of transporting large quantities of people (like Taiwan’s inter-island ferries) is going to be reserved for military use or destroyed in the opening attacks. Sadly, Taiwan’s outlying islands will likely be cut off.
Photo: Reuters
BLOCKADE
It probably won’t come to war, right? It will be a blockade. Perfectly safe. Earlier this year the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) ran 26 wargames to explore various blockade scenarios.
“In most free-play games, despite a reluctance to escalate, teams responded to perceived escalations with minor escalations of their own and in two games spiraled to a general war,” the study’s summary said.
Casualties in fixed-escalation games were high. The focus in a blockade won’t be getting people out, but getting cargo in. Many ships will be damaged or sunk. The likelihood that the blockade will involve missile and drone attacks on Taiwan is high, especially since PRC doctrine calls for attacks on Taiwan in the event of a blockade. What happens to commercial airline flights at that point? Many flights will be halted even before attacks occur because airlines won’t want to risk Beijing’s ire.
The CSIS wargames showed that “rapidly acquiring ships to run the blockade was critical because regular shipping companies would not take the risk of getting involved.” It is true that the fleet of Taiwanese-owned vessels is large, but the crews are not Taiwanese. Indeed, in many cases officers and crews of Taiwanese-owned ships may be Chinese (hello, sabotage). The problem thus isn’t going to be finding hulls, but crewing them. There is simply no great reserve of Taiwanese mariners.
Moreover, unlike migrant workers who make minimum wage and lack the savings to bribe their way out of Taiwan, the foreign crews of Taiwanese cargo vessels will often have the wherewithal to fly home from wherever in the world they make port, even at the risk of contractual punishment.
The Philippines is the world’s leading source of migrant mariners. For example, over a third of the mariners in the US fleet are Filipinos (roughly 9 percent are Chinese). In time of war how many would stay on ships being shot at, when they can easily find work in the ships of neutral nations or stay at home for a few months? Rotating home, after all, is totally normal for Filipino mariners. It is true that Filipinos also comprise roughly a third of Russian shadow fleet crews, but nobody is sinking those ships at the moment.
In an invasion, Taiwan will be a nation of ships without crews, while the Philippines will be a nation of crews without ships. Seems like a match made in heaven, but it must be fashioned into a joint policy. Being able to remove its people from Taiwan should be a powerful incentive for Manila to strike a deal on providing volunteer crews for blockade running. Taiwan also needs to begin expanding and hardening its ports in the south and on the east coast with an eye to handling mass quantities of incoming cargo and outgoing humans. In a conflict with the PRC, even tiny ports like Houbihu (後壁湖) and Houwan (後灣) in Kenting will assume critical importance.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
Recently the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and its Mini-Me partner in the legislature, the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), have been arguing that construction of chip fabs in the US by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) is little more than stripping Taiwan of its assets. For example, KMT Legislative Caucus First Deputy Secretary-General Lin Pei-hsiang (林沛祥) in January said that “This is not ‘reciprocal cooperation’ ... but a substantial hollowing out of our country.” Similarly, former TPP Chair Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) contended it constitutes “selling Taiwan out to the United States.” The two pro-China parties are proposing a bill that
March 9 to March 15 “This land produced no horses,” Qing Dynasty envoy Yu Yung-ho (郁永河) observed when he visited Taiwan in 1697. He didn’t mean that there were no horses at all; it was just difficult to transport them across the sea and raise them in the hot and humid climate. “Although 10,000 soldiers were stationed here, the camps had fewer than 1,000 horses,” Yu added. Starting from the Dutch in the 1600s, each foreign regime brought horses to Taiwan. But they remained rare animals, typically only owned by the government or
Institutions signalling a fresh beginning and new spirit often adopt new slogans, symbols and marketing materials, and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is no exception. Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), soon after taking office as KMT chair, released a new slogan that plays on the party’s acronym: “Kind Mindfulness Team.” The party recently released a graphic prominently featuring the red, white and blue of the flag with a Chinese slogan “establishing peace, blessings and fortune marching forth” (締造和平,幸福前行). One part of the graphic also features two hands in blue and white grasping olive branches in a stylized shape of Taiwan. Bonus points for
“M yeolgong jajangmyeon (anti-communism zhajiangmian, 滅共炸醬麵), let’s all shout together — myeolgong!” a chef at a Chinese restaurant in Dongtan, located about 35km south of Seoul, South Korea, calls out before serving a bowl of Korean-style zhajiangmian —black bean noodles. Diners repeat the phrase before tucking in. This political-themed restaurant, named Myeolgong Banjeom (滅共飯館, “anti-communism restaurant”), is operated by a single person and does not take reservations; therefore long queues form regularly outside, and most customers appear sympathetic to its political theme. Photos of conservative public figures hang on the walls, alongside political slogans and poems written in Chinese characters; South
RSS