The canonical shot of an East Asian city is a night skyline studded with towering apartment and office buildings, bright with neon and plastic signage, a landscape of energy and modernity. Another classic image is the same city seen from above, in which identical apartment towers march across the city, spilling out over nearby geography, like stylized soldiers colonizing new territory in a board game. Densely populated dynamic conurbations of money, technological innovation and convenience, it is hard to see the cities of East Asia as what they truly are: necropolises.
Why is this? The East Asian development model, with its gaudy miracle economies that pile up impressive industrialization, innovation, dollar reserves and exports, has a flip side. In export-oriented economies with suppressed domestic consumption (wages are held low and domestic saving encouraged to finance investment), currency controls and artificially depressed currencies, profits end up being plowed into land development, because the domestic consumption economy is too small.
This simple equation has profound implications. A key outcome of a successful export-oriented economy is wild overdevelopment of domestic land, experienced as massive and irrational overbuilding of public and private infrastructure. Japan has become the canonical example of this, with monumental public construction projects including bridges to nowhere, highways that carry a tithe of their rated capacity and village train stations built like shopping malls, all fueled by a tsunami of public debt. Its 1992 construction budget reached US$700 billion, a sum the US defense budget would not reach until over a decade later.
Photo: AFP
In Taiwan, the rivers have been lined with concrete, while housing prices skyrocket even though vacant residences are common. Meanwhile new apartment buildings mushroom across Taiwan’s cities. According to 2020 figures from the Architecture and Urban Research Institute, 62 percent of housing in South Korea consists of apartment buildings.
The Miracle economy is thus really two supernatural events: a highly visible export miracle, and an overdevelopment curse, visible only to locals.
Central to the complex ecosystems of land developers, local gangsters, corrupt local officials, gravel and concrete firms and trucking companies that drive the domestic economy are high-rise apartment buildings, where the money is. Many years ago I was at an expert talk in Taipei in which a speaker estimated that for a developer to break even on a large apartment project, just half the units must be sold, so great are the direct and indirect subsidies available to developers.
Photo: AFP
TOTAL FERTILITY RATE
The forests of residential high-rises in East Asian cities have a simple consequence for the future: across Asia and elsewhere, high-rise apartment buildings are strongly correlated with plummeting birth rates, though scholars continue to debate the reasons.
An excellent piece at Aporia by Daniel Hess lays out the correlation between apartment towers and birth rates.
Photo: Reuters
“High rise apartment towers (as they are usually built these days) are catastrophic for birth rates, and the causes are clear: there is no yard for kids to play in; kids bother the neighbors; and most apartments are too small for families,” he writes.
In suburbs, populations can be relatively dense, but birth rates are much higher, Hess says.
“Consider Sydney and Perth in Australia, where the TFR [total fertility rate] is a healthy 2.0 in the expensive but family-friendly suburbs but is an ultra-low 1.0 in the apartment-centric core.”
Photo: Lo Pei-der, Taipei Times
Asia urbanized, he said, but didn’t build suburbs on the US or Australian models.
The result of this development model is clear. Tokyo, studded with high-rises, had a TFR of .99 in 2023. In Seoul there are several districts with TFRs below 0.5 as of 2023. In central Busan in South Korea one district had a TFR of just 0.32 in 2023, less than half the city’s already low 0.66 overall TFR. South Korea’s overall TFR is around 0.8. Taiwan’s overall TFR is below 0.9. Shanghai has a TFR of just 0.57, according to calculations posted by famed Chinese demographer Yi Fuxian (易富賢) on X. Beijing, at 0.71 is right behind, and Chongqing is closing in on 1.0.
To put those numbers in perspective, at a TFR of 0.8, a population suffers a decline of over 90 percent in just three generations, the lifetime of a single human being. Tokyo is thus not a place that “offers a template” for urban development, as a recent New York Times opinion piece contended. Just the opposite: Tokyo is the place where the population of Japan goes — to die.
The supreme irony of this situation is that the ongoing demographic collapse in the East Asian construction-industrial states is slowly choking their technology export sectors to death. A hidden aspect of the Miracle export economies is slavish devotion of the workers to their tech firms. Traditionally they faced brutal workloads and long hours. The population of dedicated engineers necessary to make the export model work has been gutted by the domestic economy’s apartment-centered development model and the ideals of convenience that underpin it.
LABOR SHORTAGES
Today labor shortages are widespread across the major East Asian economies, partly due to demographics, but also to cultural change. The young do not want the work lives of their parents. Taiwan thus has deep shortages of high-level talent and mid-level professionals.
A 2023 Taipei Times editorial, one of scores of such pieces from the region on labor shortages, describes the situation: “most serious was the shortage of 84,000 mid-level technical workers, which includes technicians and associate professionals, craft and trade workers, as well as plant and machine operators.”
Taiwan hosts 750,000 migrant workers, while Korea has over a million. Even famously xenophobic Japan is starting to import people. That well will dry up in the coming decades, as these workers are drawn from countries whose TFRs are also plummeting.
The East Asian innovation and production juggernaut is living, not on borrowed time, but on borrowed populations. Its development model, lauded by economists and policymakers the world over, is a suicide pact.
There is still time for us to change.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
Has the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) changed under the leadership of Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌)? In tone and messaging, it obviously has, but this is largely driven by events over the past year. How much is surface noise, and how much is substance? How differently party founder Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) would have handled these events is impossible to determine because the biggest event was Ko’s own arrest on multiple corruption charges and being jailed incommunicado. To understand the similarities and differences that may be evolving in the Huang era, we must first understand Ko’s TPP. ELECTORAL STRATEGY The party’s strategy under Ko was
It’s Aug. 8, Father’s Day in Taiwan. I asked a Chinese chatbot a simple question: “How is Father’s Day celebrated in Taiwan and China?” The answer was as ideological as it was unexpected. The AI said Taiwan is “a region” (地區) and “a province of China” (中國的省份). It then adopted the collective pronoun “we” to praise the holiday in the voice of the “Chinese government,” saying Father’s Day aligns with “core socialist values” of the “Chinese nation.” The chatbot was DeepSeek, the fastest growing app ever to reach 100 million users (in seven days!) and one of the world’s most advanced and
Before the recall election drowned out other news, CNN last month became the latest in a long line of media organs to report on abuses of migrant workers in Taiwan’s fishing fleet. After a brief flare of interest, the news media moved on. The migrant worker issues, however, did not. CNN’s stinging title, “Taiwan is held up as a bastion of liberal values. But migrant workers report abuse, injury and death in its fishing industry,” was widely quoted, including by the Fisheries Agency in its response. It obviously hurt. The Fisheries Agency was not slow to convey a classic government
It turns out many Americans aren’t great at identifying which personal decisions contribute most to climate change. A study recently published by the National Academy of Sciences found that when asked to rank actions, such as swapping a car that uses gasoline for an electric one, carpooling or reducing food waste, participants weren’t very accurate when assessing how much those actions contributed to climate change, which is caused mostly by the release of greenhouse gases that happen when fuels like gasoline, oil and coal are burned. “People over-assign impact to actually pretty low-impact actions such as recycling, and underestimate the actual carbon
RSS