Taiwanese chip-making giant Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) plans to invest a whopping US$100 billion in the US, after US President Donald Trump threatened to slap tariffs on overseas-made chips.
TSMC is the world’s biggest maker of the critical technology that has become the lifeblood of the global economy.
This week’s announcement takes the total amount TSMC has pledged to invest in the US to US$165 billion, which the company says is the “largest single foreign direct investment in US history.”
Photo: Bloomberg
It follows Trump’s accusations that Taiwan stole the US chip industry and his threats to impose tariffs of up to 100 percent — and Taipei’s promises to invest more in the US.
The following is a look at what TSMC’s investment could mean for Taiwan.
‘SILICON SHIELD’
Photo: AFP
Semiconductor chips are used in everything from smartphones and televisions to electric vehicles and missiles — and more than half of them are made in Taiwan.
The concentration of chip manufacturing has long been seen as a “silicon shield” protecting the country from an invasion or blockade by China — and an incentive for the US to defend it.
China has upped military pressure on Taiwan in recent years to press its unfounded claim of sovereignty over the country, where TSMC has its headquarters and the bulk of its fabrication plants.
That has fueled calls for the firm to move more of its production out of the country to avoid supply disruptions if China did attack. Trump recently warned of import levies of 25 percent, or higher, on overseas-made chips, which one analyst has said could trigger a recession in the industry.
While TSMC’s latest investment might deflect the threat of tariffs, there are fears it could hurt Taiwan’s economy and weaken its “silicon shield.”
“The more TSMC produces in the United States, the less important Taiwan will be in geopolitics and the less incentives the United States will have to help Taiwan in the future,” said Ko Ju-chun (葛如鈞), a lawmaker with the main opposition Chinese Nationalist Party.
CONTROL OF TSMC
Taiwan’s leaders are aware of the risks as they try to stay onside with their most important security backer Washington and protect the nation’s status as a chip-making powerhouse.
President William Lai (賴清德) office said Tuesday the government would review TSMC’s deal “in accordance with the law” and ensure that the “most advanced” chip-making processes stayed in Taiwan.
TSMC had already pledged to invest more than US$65 billion in three factories in the US state of Arizona, one of which began production late last year. The US$100 billion investment will be used to expand its US footprint further, with three new fabrication plants, two advanced packaging facilities and a research and development team center.
Richard Hu (胡瑞舟), deputy director of the Taiwan Center for Security Studies think tank, said Trump wanted to prevent TSMC from falling into China’s hands and to make it a “technological asset of the United States.”
“Trump’s ultimate goal is to ensure that the US can fully or critically control TSMC’s semiconductor production, making it a de facto part of America’s chip industry,” Hu said.
DEFENSE GUARANTEES
Taipei security analyst Su Tzu-yun (蘇紫雲) was more optimistic, saying that TSMC’s investment would make Taiwan “safer” and help grow the chip industry.
It would also build trust between Taipei and Washington, and ease Trump’s concerns about US economic security, said Su, from the Institute for National Defense and Security Research.
“I think the importance of Taiwan is not only TSMC but also the geostrategy,” Su said, noting the importance of global shipping lanes near Taiwan.
However, James Yifan Chen of Tamkang University said higher manufacturing costs in the US would drive up prices of products using TSMC chips.
And there were no guarantees the investment would make the mercurial Trump more inclined to defend Taiwan.
“The deal’s effect on US willingness to defend Taiwan is unclear,” said Sung Wen-Ti (宋文笛), a nonresident fellow with the Atlantic Council’s Global China Hub.
“It really depends on how Trump feels on any particular day, and whether Beijing will attempt to outbid Taiwan subsequently.”
Taiwan has next to no political engagement in Myanmar, either with the ruling military junta nor the dozens of armed groups who’ve in the last five years taken over around two-thirds of the nation’s territory in a sprawling, patchwork civil war. But early last month, the leader of one relatively minor Burmese revolutionary faction, General Nerdah Bomya, who is also an alleged war criminal, made a low key visit to Taipei, where he met with a member of President William Lai’s (賴清德) staff, a retired Taiwanese military official and several academics. “I feel like Taiwan is a good example of
March 2 to March 8 Gunfire rang out along the shore of the frontline island of Lieyu (烈嶼) on a foggy afternoon on March 7, 1987. By the time it was over, about 20 unarmed Vietnamese refugees — men, women, elderly and children — were dead. They were hastily buried, followed by decades of silence. Months later, opposition politicians and journalists tried to uncover what had happened, but conflicting accounts only deepened the confusion. One version suggested that government troops had mistakenly killed their own operatives attempting to return home from Vietnam. The military maintained that the
“M yeolgong jajangmyeon (anti-communism zhajiangmian, 滅共炸醬麵), let’s all shout together — myeolgong!” a chef at a Chinese restaurant in Dongtan, located about 35km south of Seoul, South Korea, calls out before serving a bowl of Korean-style zhajiangmian —black bean noodles. Diners repeat the phrase before tucking in. This political-themed restaurant, named Myeolgong Banjeom (滅共飯館, “anti-communism restaurant”), is operated by a single person and does not take reservations; therefore long queues form regularly outside, and most customers appear sympathetic to its political theme. Photos of conservative public figures hang on the walls, alongside political slogans and poems written in Chinese characters; South
Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) announced last week a city policy to get businesses to reduce working hours to seven hours per day for employees with children 12 and under at home. The city promised to subsidize 80 percent of the employees’ wage loss. Taipei can do this, since the Celestial Dragon Kingdom (天龍國), as it is sardonically known to the denizens of Taiwan’s less fortunate regions, has an outsize grip on the government budget. Like most subsidies, this will likely have little effect on Taiwan’s catastrophic birth rates, though it may be a relief to the shrinking number of
RSS