When Angelica Oung received the notification that her Xiaohongshu account had been blocked for violating the social media app’s code of conduct, her mind started racing.
The only picture she had posted on her account, apart from her profile headshot, was of herself wearing an inflatable polar bear suit, holding a sign saying: “I love nuclear.” What could be the problem with that, wondered Oung, a clean energy activist in Taiwan.
Was it because, at a glance, her picture looked like someone holding a placard at a protest? Was it because her costume looked a bit like the white hazmat suits worn by China’s Covid prevention workers during the pandemic, who became a widely reviled symbol of the lockdown? Or was it because in the background was Taipei 101, Taiwan’s iconic skyscraper?
Photo: AFP
Oung never found out.
“It is really opaque,” she said, “my theory is that Xiaohongshu just got slammed with so many new accounts.”
TIKTOK REFUGEES
Photo: Reuters
More than 3 million US users signed up to Xiaohongshu last week, according to Reuters. “TikTok refugees” have fled to the app, also known as RedNote, as TikTok was banned in the US on Sunday after refusing to divest from its Chinese parent company, ByteDance.
On Friday, the US Supreme Court upheld the ruling, rejecting an appeal against the ban from TikTok, which has more than 170 million American users.
Founded in 2013 as an online community focused on shopping and travel tips, the Shanghai-based Xiaohongshu has more than 300 million, predominantly female, users. It is reportedly valued at US$17 billion.
The surge of new users it is experiencing has forced Xiaohongshu’s moderators to scramble to keep the content on the platform in line with Beijing’s censorship requirements. Unlike TikTok, which is an international subsidiary and has a sister app for Chinese users, Xiaohongshu is a purely Chinese operation.
TikTok’s detractors argue that it is a danger to national security because the users’ data is at risk of being compromised by China. Some lawmakers have also raised concerns that the content on the platform is manipulated to suit Beijing’s interests.
TikTok denies both of those accusations.
But fearful of losing access to their favorite app — and perhaps just jumping on a new trend — users have defied the lawmakers’ concerns about the Chinese Communist party and flocked to another Chinese platform.
WATCHFUL EYE
Like all Chinese social media, Xiaohongshu’s content is strictly censored in line with Beijing’s laws, which prohibit content deemed counter to the government’s interests.
In 2022, a leaked internal document revealed how Xiaohongshu censored “sudden incidents” on its platform, such as discussion of natural disasters and political disturbances.
But its existing guidelines are for Chinese-language content. This week, the hashtag “Red Note is urgently recruiting English content moderators” trended on Weibo, and job listings for English-language Xiaohongshu moderators have been appearing on recruitment websites. Chinese officials have reportedly told the company to ensure that China-based users can’t see posts from US users.
While Chinese internet users are adept at finding their ways round censorship, they are also used to self-censorship, avoiding certain topics that could get them blocked. On Xiaohongshu, they have tips for the American newcomers.
“DON’T mention sensitive topics,” counseled a lifestyle influencer.
“Don’t talk about religion or politics,” said a British user in China, who said he has been on the platform for five years.
Christine Lu, an entrepreneur based in Los Angeles, was also blocked from Xiaohongshu last week. As a test of the app’s censors, she had posted pictures that featured the Tibetan flag and the Taiwan flag — both topics that are considered “sensitive” in China.
“As suspected, it’s going to be impossible to have fully self-expressed conversations with Chinese people in China via this app,” Lu said on X.
Eric Liu, a former content moderator for Weibo, said: “It is still very difficult for Chinese internet companies to conduct English censorship … censors mainly rely on the understanding of China’s political correctness that is cultivated in school and in ideological and political courses … you can’t just rely on translation software.”
Liu said Xiaohongshu’s lack of English-language capacity meant that censorship was likely to be “rough and indiscriminate … giving priority to satisfying the requirements of the authorities.”
The censorship, and banning of users, may pour cold water on the idea that the app could be a place for Chinese and US internet users to communicate and share jokes and memes.
“I do think it is an unalloyed good that people who are in countries that are geopolitically at odds, and perhaps for good reason, just get to connect with each other,” said Oung.
But there will be a “rude awakening eventually.”
Oung says: “It’s a really interesting test of whether the Chinese government feels confident enough to actually let it continue.”
Chenchen Zhang, an assistant professor at Durham University, said that the current enthusiasm for the uniting power of social media is a “surreal” throwback to the utopian ideals of the internet in the 1990s.
In the March 9 edition of the Taipei Times a piece by Ninon Godefroy ran with the headine “The quiet, gentle rhythm of Taiwan.” It started with the line “Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention.” I laughed out loud at that. This was out of no disrespect for the author or the piece, which made some interesting analogies and good points about how both Din Tai Fung’s and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) meticulous attention to detail and quality are not quite up to
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) hatched a bold plan to charge forward and seize the initiative when he held a protest in front of the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office. Though risky, because illegal, its success would help tackle at least six problems facing both himself and the KMT. What he did not see coming was Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) tripping him up out of the gate. In spite of Chu being the most consequential and successful KMT chairman since the early 2010s — arguably saving the party from financial ruin and restoring its electoral viability —
It is one of the more remarkable facts of Taiwan history that it was never occupied or claimed by any of the numerous kingdoms of southern China — Han or otherwise — that lay just across the water from it. None of their brilliant ministers ever discovered that Taiwan was a “core interest” of the state whose annexation was “inevitable.” As Paul Kua notes in an excellent monograph laying out how the Portuguese gave Taiwan the name “Formosa,” the first Europeans to express an interest in occupying Taiwan were the Spanish. Tonio Andrade in his seminal work, How Taiwan Became Chinese,
Toward the outside edge of Taichung City, in Wufeng District (霧峰去), sits a sprawling collection of single-story buildings with tiled roofs belonging to the Wufeng Lin (霧峰林家) family, who rose to prominence through success in military, commercial, and artistic endeavors in the 19th century. Most of these buildings have brick walls and tiled roofs in the traditional reddish-brown color, but in the middle is one incongruous property with bright white walls and a black tiled roof: Yipu Garden (頤圃). Purists may scoff at the Japanese-style exterior and its radical departure from the Fujianese architectural style of the surrounding buildings. However, the property
RSS