While global attention is finally being focused on the People’s Republic of China (PRC) gray zone aggression against Philippine territory in the South China Sea, at the other end of the PRC’s infamous 9 dash line map, PRC vessels are conducting an identical campaign against Indonesia, most importantly in the Natuna Islands.
The Natunas fall into a gray area: do the dashes at the end of the PRC “cow’s tongue” map include the islands? It’s not clear. Less well known is that they also fall into another gray area. Indonesia’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) claim and continental shelf claim are not coincident in that area, as Australian security and defense expert Euan Graham pointed out on X (Twitter) last week. “China knows how to exploit a grey zone when it sees one,” he observed.
The Natuna Regency, the Indonesian administrative name for the region, contains “at least” 154 islands, 127 of which are uninhabited, according to Wikipedia. As always, after supplying some facts to orient the reader, Wiki then moves on to the history, where, in the very first sentence, we are treated to an amazing nonsense artifact: “The Natuna Islands were discovered by I-Tsing in 671 A.D. and mentioned throughout his notes in A Record of Buddhist Practices Sent Home from the Southern Sea.”
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
I-Tsing (Yijing, 義淨), was a Tang Dynasty Buddhist scholar whose travel writings are important sources of information on the routes between India, China and the kingdoms of what is today Malaysia and Indonesia. He is famed for translating Buddhist texts, and for his commentaries on the state of Buddhism in the places he visited. He did not, however, “discover” anything. He was a monk, incapable of operating a ship or recording navigational information. The only difference between himself and the cargo aboard the vessels he rode on was that he was alive.
Anyone who wants to see what Wikipedia would be like if PRC propagandists had unlimited access need only visit Quora, which on matters related to the PRC is nigh-on useless, thanks to the 50-cent brigade. But despite Wikipedia’s generally sturdy editing work, pro-PRC statements and frames like this creep in. As the first sentence in the “history” section, it subtly supports the PRC claim to the area by attributing “discovery” to someone from China.
YIJING’S ACCOUNTS
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
As history the statement is absurd. Tang-era ships did not play the routes between India, China and southeast Asia. In the seventh century that was the domain of Near Eastern and Indian seafarers who had been part of extensive trade networks across seas of India and southeast Asia for at least a millennium. Yijing himself records that he left from Guangzhou aboard a Persian vessel and sailed to Srivijaya in what is now Indonesia. Along the way he kept running notes on the locations he passed, on their customs and their adherence to Buddhism. It is obvious from both his notes and his occasional references that the islands he passed were inhabited (as many are today).
Yijing’s notes are merely the oldest surviving written account of the area. Since tablets with writing from the Srivijaya kingdom are known from shortly after his time, it is highly plausible that even that state is simply the luck of archaeological practice. Sooner or later earlier inscribed objects discussing the area will be unearthed.
However, there must have been written accounts galore. The loss of so much of the Greco-Roman classical corpus is generally mourned, but the loss of writings from southeast Asia must have been just as great. Yijing records the habits of Buddhist monks wherever he went, describing in minute detail their variations in habits. Buddhism is a text-based religion, and must have been transmitted from literate to literate. With the thousand monks then in residence, Yijing himself extols Srivijaya as an excellent place to study Buddhist texts. All lost, today.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
Yijing admits he is uncertain of the size of the area, and remarks that the merchants who regularly plied these waters would know. Scholars and dilettantes of our own age tend to focus on the literati of a bygone age, a subtle class solidarity that reaches across time, distorting what it touches. Yet, also lost is another enormous corpus of records: the rutters used by local pilots to navigate.
A rutter is a set of notes a navigator compiles about routes, landmarks, the sea and its currents and tides, the sea bottom, astronomy, climate, wind conditions and other aspects of navigation and port activities. The word in English comes down from Arabic, indicating the importance of Arab rutters in the development of similar western texts. The Persian ship that took Yijing to Indonesia must have had a set of rutters describing the route and its associated land masses in detail, developed over numerous voyages.
HISTORICAL PROPAGANDA
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
These conclusions about Yijing are also true of every other “historical link” invented or appropriated by the PRC for its historical propaganda. The PRC often cites the scribblings of its literati in their travels as legitimating texts for its expansionist claims, appealing to the historical bias that treats literati as a superior source of knowledge. The truth is that the Chinese literati, landlubbers traveling long-established routes, were always the last to know of a place. Centuries before them, the masters of the ships on which they traveled already knew the routes and recorded them in their rutters. Most of these have been lost.
One of the ways our social biases toward the literate and toward history as the story of the upper class help the PRC erase the past is that we forget the existence of documents like rutters, and the non-Han sailors who compiled them (going all the way back to the Austronesians and Negritos who first settled southeast Asia). PRC discourse wants us to focus on the Chinese and their activities, which not only moves them into prominence, but conceals the expert navigators who carried them and their trade goods from one place to another.
Since mid-October a Norwegian survey ship contracted by Indonesia has been in the Natunas performing a fossil fuel survey, and the PRC coast guard has parked a ship there to shadow it. Indonesian navy vessels have been unable to eject the PRC ships and clear the area. Each time the Indonesian authorities have reported ejecting them, the PRC coast guard has returned. As the Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative (AMTI) observes, though PRC vessels and the Indonesian coast guard have clashed before, this is the first time the Indonesian government has been so prompt in releasing information on PRC activities.
Expect the Natunas, and Yijing’s name, to come up more often.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
Behind a car repair business on a nondescript Thai street are the cherished pets of a rising TikTok animal influencer: two lions and a 200-kilogram lion-tiger hybrid called “Big George.” Lion ownership is legal in Thailand, and Tharnuwarht Plengkemratch is an enthusiastic advocate, posting updates on his feline companions to nearly three million followers. “They’re playful and affectionate, just like dogs or cats,” he said from inside their cage complex at his home in the northern city of Chiang Mai. Thailand’s captive lion population has exploded in recent years, with nearly 500 registered in zoos, breeding farms, petting cafes and homes. Experts warn the
No one saw it coming. Everyone — including the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) — expected at least some of the recall campaigns against 24 of its lawmakers and Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) to succeed. Underground gamblers reportedly expected between five and eight lawmakers to lose their jobs. All of this analysis made sense, but contained a fatal flaw. The record of the recall campaigns, the collapse of the KMT-led recalls, and polling data all pointed to enthusiastic high turnout in support of the recall campaigns, and that those against the recalls were unenthusiastic and far less likely to vote. That
The unexpected collapse of the recall campaigns is being viewed through many lenses, most of them skewed and self-absorbed. The international media unsurprisingly focuses on what they perceive as the message that Taiwanese voters were sending in the failure of the mass recall, especially to China, the US and to friendly Western nations. This made some sense prior to early last month. One of the main arguments used by recall campaigners for recalling Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers was that they were too pro-China, and by extension not to be trusted with defending the nation. Also by extension, that argument could be
Aug. 4 to Aug. 10 When Coca-Cola finally pushed its way into Taiwan’s market in 1968, it allegedly vowed to wipe out its major domestic rival Hey Song within five years. But Hey Song, which began as a manual operation in a family cow shed in 1925, had proven its resilience, surviving numerous setbacks — including the loss of autonomy and nearly all its assets due to the Japanese colonial government’s wartime economic policy. By the 1960s, Hey Song had risen to the top of Taiwan’s beverage industry. This success was driven not only by president Chang Wen-chi’s
RSS