The largest primate ever to walk the Earth went extinct because it could not adapt to its changing environment, with the mighty beast reduced to living off bark and twigs before dying off, scientists said on Wednesday.
Gigantopithecus blacki, which stood three meters tall and weighed up to 300 kilograms, thrived in the forests of southern Asia until a little more than 200,000 years ago.
Exactly why the great ape died off after flourishing for hundreds of thousands of years has been one of the lasting mysteries of paleontology ever since a German scientist first stumbled on one of its teeth at a Hong Kong apothecary in the 1930s.
Photo: AFP
The molar was so massive it was being sold as a “dragon’s tooth.”
“It was three to four times bigger than the teeth from any great ape,” said Renaud Joannes-Boyau, a researcher at Australia’s Southern Cross University and a co-author of a new study in the journal Nature. “That intrigued him and that’s where all this research started.”
All that has been found of the Gigantopithecus since are four partial jawbones and around 2,000 teeth, hundreds of which were discovered inside caves in southern China’s Guangxi province.
Even after a decade of excavations in these caves, the cause of the ape’s extinction remained elusive, said the study’s co-lead author Yingqi Zhang of China’s Institute of Vertebrate Palaeontology and Palaeoanthropology.
HUGE APES CAN’T JUMP
Seeking to establish a timeline of the animal’s existence, the team of Chinese, Australian and US scientists collected fossilized teeth from 22 caves.
The team used six different techniques to determine the age of the fossils, including a relatively new method called luminescence dating which measures the last time minerals were exposed to sunlight.
The oldest teeth dated back more than two million years, while the most recent were from around 250,000 ago.
Now the researchers can tell “the complete story about Gigantopithecus’s extinction” for the first time, Zhang said in his office in Beijing.
They established that the animal’s “extinction window” was between 215,000 and 295,000 years ago, significantly earlier than previously thought.
During this time, the seasons were becoming more pronounced, which was changing the local environment. The thick, lush forest that Gigantopithecus had thrived in was starting to give way to more open forests and grassland. This increasingly deprived the ape of its favorite food: fruit.
The huge animal was bound to the ground, unable swing into the trees for higher food.
Instead, it “relied on less nutritious fall-back food such as bark and twigs,” said Kira Westaway, a geochronologist at Australia’s Macquarie University and co-lead author.
Zhang said this was a “huge mistake” which ultimately led to the animal’s extinction.
CLEVER RELATIVE
The primate’s size made it difficult to go very far to search for food — and its massive bulk meant that it needed plenty to eat.
Despite these challenges, “surprisingly G. blacki even increased in size during this time,” Westaway said.
By analyzing its teeth, the researchers were able to measure the increasing stress the ape was under as its numbers shrunk.
They also compared Gigantopithecus’ fate to its orangutan relative, Pongo weidenreichi, which handled the changing environment far better.
The orangutan was smaller and more agile, able to move swiftly through the forest canopy to gather a variety of food such as leaves, flowers, nuts, seeds and even insects and small mammals. It became even smaller over time, thriving as its massive cousin Gigantopithecus starved.
Westaway emphasized that it was important to understand the fate of the species that came before us — particularly “with the threat of a sixth mass extinction event looming over us.”
In the March 9 edition of the Taipei Times a piece by Ninon Godefroy ran with the headine “The quiet, gentle rhythm of Taiwan.” It started with the line “Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention.” I laughed out loud at that. This was out of no disrespect for the author or the piece, which made some interesting analogies and good points about how both Din Tai Fung’s and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) meticulous attention to detail and quality are not quite up to
April 21 to April 27 Hsieh Er’s (謝娥) political fortunes were rising fast after she got out of jail and joined the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in December 1945. Not only did she hold key positions in various committees, she was elected the only woman on the Taipei City Council and headed to Nanjing in 1946 as the sole Taiwanese female representative to the National Constituent Assembly. With the support of first lady Soong May-ling (宋美齡), she started the Taipei Women’s Association and Taiwan Provincial Women’s Association, where she
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) hatched a bold plan to charge forward and seize the initiative when he held a protest in front of the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office. Though risky, because illegal, its success would help tackle at least six problems facing both himself and the KMT. What he did not see coming was Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) tripping him up out of the gate. In spite of Chu being the most consequential and successful KMT chairman since the early 2010s — arguably saving the party from financial ruin and restoring its electoral viability —
It is one of the more remarkable facts of Taiwan history that it was never occupied or claimed by any of the numerous kingdoms of southern China — Han or otherwise — that lay just across the water from it. None of their brilliant ministers ever discovered that Taiwan was a “core interest” of the state whose annexation was “inevitable.” As Paul Kua notes in an excellent monograph laying out how the Portuguese gave Taiwan the name “Formosa,” the first Europeans to express an interest in occupying Taiwan were the Spanish. Tonio Andrade in his seminal work, How Taiwan Became Chinese,
RSS