The largest primate ever to walk the Earth went extinct because it could not adapt to its changing environment, with the mighty beast reduced to living off bark and twigs before dying off, scientists said on Wednesday.
Gigantopithecus blacki, which stood three meters tall and weighed up to 300 kilograms, thrived in the forests of southern Asia until a little more than 200,000 years ago.
Exactly why the great ape died off after flourishing for hundreds of thousands of years has been one of the lasting mysteries of paleontology ever since a German scientist first stumbled on one of its teeth at a Hong Kong apothecary in the 1930s.
Photo: AFP
The molar was so massive it was being sold as a “dragon’s tooth.”
“It was three to four times bigger than the teeth from any great ape,” said Renaud Joannes-Boyau, a researcher at Australia’s Southern Cross University and a co-author of a new study in the journal Nature. “That intrigued him and that’s where all this research started.”
All that has been found of the Gigantopithecus since are four partial jawbones and around 2,000 teeth, hundreds of which were discovered inside caves in southern China’s Guangxi province.
Even after a decade of excavations in these caves, the cause of the ape’s extinction remained elusive, said the study’s co-lead author Yingqi Zhang of China’s Institute of Vertebrate Palaeontology and Palaeoanthropology.
HUGE APES CAN’T JUMP
Seeking to establish a timeline of the animal’s existence, the team of Chinese, Australian and US scientists collected fossilized teeth from 22 caves.
The team used six different techniques to determine the age of the fossils, including a relatively new method called luminescence dating which measures the last time minerals were exposed to sunlight.
The oldest teeth dated back more than two million years, while the most recent were from around 250,000 ago.
Now the researchers can tell “the complete story about Gigantopithecus’s extinction” for the first time, Zhang said in his office in Beijing.
They established that the animal’s “extinction window” was between 215,000 and 295,000 years ago, significantly earlier than previously thought.
During this time, the seasons were becoming more pronounced, which was changing the local environment. The thick, lush forest that Gigantopithecus had thrived in was starting to give way to more open forests and grassland. This increasingly deprived the ape of its favorite food: fruit.
The huge animal was bound to the ground, unable swing into the trees for higher food.
Instead, it “relied on less nutritious fall-back food such as bark and twigs,” said Kira Westaway, a geochronologist at Australia’s Macquarie University and co-lead author.
Zhang said this was a “huge mistake” which ultimately led to the animal’s extinction.
CLEVER RELATIVE
The primate’s size made it difficult to go very far to search for food — and its massive bulk meant that it needed plenty to eat.
Despite these challenges, “surprisingly G. blacki even increased in size during this time,” Westaway said.
By analyzing its teeth, the researchers were able to measure the increasing stress the ape was under as its numbers shrunk.
They also compared Gigantopithecus’ fate to its orangutan relative, Pongo weidenreichi, which handled the changing environment far better.
The orangutan was smaller and more agile, able to move swiftly through the forest canopy to gather a variety of food such as leaves, flowers, nuts, seeds and even insects and small mammals. It became even smaller over time, thriving as its massive cousin Gigantopithecus starved.
Westaway emphasized that it was important to understand the fate of the species that came before us — particularly “with the threat of a sixth mass extinction event looming over us.”
June 23 to June 29 After capturing the walled city of Hsinchu on June 22, 1895, the Japanese hoped to quickly push south and seize control of Taiwan’s entire west coast — but their advance was stalled for more than a month. Not only did local Hakka fighters continue to cause them headaches, resistance forces even attempted to retake the city three times. “We had planned to occupy Anping (Tainan) and Takao (Kaohsiung) as soon as possible, but ever since we took Hsinchu, nearby bandits proclaiming to be ‘righteous people’ (義民) have been destroying train tracks and electrical cables, and gathering in villages
Dr. Y. Tony Yang, Associate Dean of Health Policy and Population Science at George Washington University, argued last week in a piece for the Taipei Times about former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) leading a student delegation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that, “The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world” (“Ma’s Visit, DPP’s Blind Spot,” June 18, page 8). Yang contends that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has a blind spot: “By treating any
Swooping low over the banks of a Nile River tributary, an aid flight run by retired American military officers released a stream of food-stuffed sacks over a town emptied by fighting in South Sudan, a country wracked by conflict. Last week’s air drop was the latest in a controversial development — private contracting firms led by former US intelligence officers and military veterans delivering aid to some of the world’s deadliest conflict zones, in operations organized with governments that are combatants in the conflicts. The moves are roiling the global aid community, which warns of a more militarized, politicized and profit-seeking trend
This year will go down in the history books. Taiwan faces enormous turmoil and uncertainty in the coming months. Which political parties are in a good position to handle big changes? All of the main parties are beset with challenges. Taking stock, this column examined the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) (“Huang Kuo-chang’s choking the life out of the TPP,” May 28, page 12), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) (“Challenges amid choppy waters for the DPP,” June 14, page 12) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) (“KMT struggles to seize opportunities as ‘interesting times’ loom,” June 20, page 11). Times like these can
RSS