California next year will become one of the few US states to teach students media literacy, a move experts say is imperative at a time when distrust in the media is at an all-time high and new technologies pose unprecedented challenges to identifying false information.
A state bill signed into law this fall mandates public schools to instruct media literacy, a set of skills that includes recognizing falsified data, identifying fake news and generating responsible Internet content.
Researchers have long warned that the current digital ecosystem has had dire consequences on young people, and have argued that such instruction could make a difference. The US surgeon general has cited digital and media literacy support as one way to combat the youth mental health crisis spurred by social media.
Photo courtesy of Pexels
The American Psychological Association already has urged parents and schools to teach media literacy before they expose young people to social media platforms.
‘REAL-WORLD IMPACTS’
“What happens online can have the most terrifying of real-world impacts,” the California assembly member Marc Berman, who sponsored the bill, said in a statement.
Photo courtesy of Pexels
“This instruction will help students to be more responsible digital citizens, more intentional about what they put online, and better understand online safety and privacy.”
Just 18 states have enacted formal media literacy education standards or requirements so far. Those that have made it a focus — ranging from New Jersey and Delaware to Texas and Florida — cut across the political spectrum. When Assembly Bill 873 passed this fall, it was with nearly unanimous bipartisan support.
Erin McNeill, the founder and CEO of advocacy group Media Literacy Now, says that shows the broad appeal of teaching young people these skills.
“There is recognition from both sides that this really is essential,” McNeill said. “I can’t think of anything that’s more critical in education right now.”
California has been gradually incorporating media literacy into its education legislation for more than a decade.
Since 2010, media literacy has been part of its Model School Library Standards, which suggest — but do not enforce — curriculum goals. Another law passed in 2018 required that the state make instructional resources on media literacy available for educators, but did not mandate the materials to be used or the subjects to be covered.
The new bill takes things a step further, said Alice Huguet, an education researcher and policy professor for kindergarten through 12th grade at the Rand Corporation.
MEDIA LITERACY
For one thing, it recognizes the sweeping applications of media literacy.
“A lot of coverage focuses on media literacy as fact-checking, but it’s more complex than that,” Huguet said, explaining that a lot of the skills involve recognizing emotional manipulation, factual absence and author intent. “It’s about being a critical thinker.”
It also explicitly calls for the teaching of good digital citizenship, which, Huguet explained, means interacting responsibly with others online, recognizing the importance of digital privacy and “engaging in civil dialogue” with peers. The lessons will ask students to think about their contributions to the media ecosystem.
“They’re putting things out into the world. In that sense, the bill is more well-rounded,” Huguet said.
Rather than having media literacy as a standalone course, the bill requires that schools incorporate media and digital literacy lessons into existing core subjects, from language arts and history to science and mathematics. That should not only make the integration more feasible for teachers and friendly for budgets, experts and advocates say, but will also convey how media literacy is a fundamental life skill.
GUIDANCE
What classes ultimately look like will be up to individual districts and educators.
“It’s just guidance,” said Mike Torres, the director of the California department of education’s curriculum frameworks and instructional resources division. Because schools receive untethered funding, Torres explained, they can use as much or as little of it as they’d like on media literacy education, and may choose to use any materials to do so, as long as they’ve been evaluated.
For Torres, the true value of the bill is in the attention it draws to media literacy as an issue.
“It’s important to get the word out,” he said.
By that measure, the legislation has already been successful.
“We’ve gotten dozens and dozens of inquiries about media literacy. It’s bringing that conversation to the forefront,” Torres said.
Others worry that its vague language may limit the bill’s effectiveness.
“Getting the bill passed is just half the battle,” said Huguet. “There needs to be effective communication and collaboration with stakeholders, as well as ongoing monitoring if they’re serious about it.”
Jessica Lee, the district library coordinator at the Berkeley Unified School District (BUSD), on the other hand, is concerned that unequal resources across the state will make it hard for implementation to be uniform. In Berkeley, for instance, local measures pull from property taxes to fund libraries and other services. Districts without such measures, or where property values are lower, don’t have the same luxury. “We can do this because our district has the funding,” Lee said.
EFFECTIVE
Despite those operational challenges, research points to the effectiveness of teaching media literacy early and often. According to Sam Wineburg, a psychologist and professor of education at Stanford University, skills like digital fact-checking can’t just be presumed, especially in a media environment that encourages speed over accuracy — they need to be explicitly instructed.
What’s more, students like learning media literacy skills, he said.
“They really enjoy anything where you’re looking behind the screen and lifting the curtain on how things work.”
For Chris Albeck, the director of curriculum and instruction at the BUSD, teaching media literacy is about meeting the current moment.
“Students have a lot more access now than they have before,” he said. “Kids will be kids. Kids will do things. But kids can also be taught the right ways to interface with the digital world, [including] outside of school, when their teachers aren’t looking.”
Huguet said she has heard a greater sense of urgency surrounding the topic in the lead-up to the next election cycle. “The vast majority of high school students don’t vote, but they will,” she said.
Cheng Ching-hsiang (鄭青祥) turned a small triangle of concrete jammed between two old shops into a cool little bar called 9dimension. In front of the shop, a steampunk-like structure was welded by himself to serve as a booth where he prepares cocktails. “Yancheng used to be just old people,” he says, “but now young people are coming and creating the New Yancheng.” Around the corner, Yu Hsiu-jao (饒毓琇), opened Tiny Cafe. True to its name, it is the size of a cupboard and serves cold-brewed coffee. “Small shops are so special and have personality,” she says, “people come to Yancheng to find such treasures.” She
In July of 1995, a group of local DJs began posting an event flyer around Taipei. It was cheaply photocopied and nearly all in English, with a hand-drawn map on the back and, on the front, a big red hand print alongside one prominent line of text, “Finally… THE PARTY.” The map led to a remote floodplain in Taipei County (now New Taipei City) just across the Tamsui River from Taipei. The organizers got permission from no one. They just drove up in a blue Taiwanese pickup truck, set up a generator, two speakers, two turntables and a mixer. They
The low voter turnout for the referendum on Aug. 23 shows that many Taiwanese are apathetic about nuclear energy, but there are long-term energy stakes involved that the public needs to grasp Taiwan faces an energy trilemma: soaring AI-driven demand, pressure to cut carbon and reliance on fragile fuel imports. But the nuclear referendum on Aug. 23 showed how little this registered with voters, many of whom neither see the long game nor grasp the stakes. Volunteer referendum worker Vivian Chen (陳薇安) put it bluntly: “I’ve seen many people asking what they’re voting for when they arrive to vote. They cast their vote without even doing any research.” Imagine Taiwanese voters invited to a poker table. The bet looked simple — yes or no — yet most never showed. More than two-thirds of those
Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu’s (洪秀柱) attendance at the Chinese Communist Party’s (CPP) “Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War” parade in Beijing is infuriating, embarrassing and insulting to nearly everyone in Taiwan, and Taiwan’s friends and allies. She is also ripping off bandages and pouring salt into old wounds. In the process she managed to tie both the KMT and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) into uncomfortable knots. The KMT continues to honor their heroic fighters, who defended China against the invading Japanese Empire, which inflicted unimaginable horrors on the
RSS