Luke Haga has spent the past two years getting ready for the race of his life. Haga, a sprinter, is preparing for the Pacific Games which will be held in his home of Solomon Islands in November.
“It’s a time for sports, fun and to celebrate our togetherness, ” says the 23-year-old, who is training for his events in China.
Held every four years, athletes from 24 Pacific Island countries will compete in the Olympic-style tournament. While many share Haga’s excitement, the Games have also attracted controversy, primarily over the cost. Solomon Islands is one of the poorest nations in the Pacific and China, along with other countries, will foot most of the bill. The two-week event has been criticized for diverting funds from much-needed services in the country and prompting school closures. Questions have also been raised over how the new infrastructure will be maintained in the long term.
Photo: Reuters
CHINA’S ‘SHREWD DIPLOMACY’
National Hosting Authority executive director Christian Nieng says the Games will be funded 80 percent from foreign sources and the remainder by Solomon Islands.
China has spent one billion Solomon Islander dollars (SBD) (US$119 million) on facilities for the tournament, notably a 10,000-seat National Stadium, according to Solomon Islands and China’s government.
In addition to the stadium, Beijing has helped build sports facilities including a swimming pool, tennis courts and administration buildings.
At the opening of the stadium last month, China’s ambassador to Solomon Islands, Li Ming (李明), said the facility was “a gift from China.”
“The stadium now belongs to the people of the Solomon Islands. There are no political conditions attached,” Li said.
“It’s the largest facility in the Pacific and symbolizes the friendship between the PRC [People’s Republic of China] and Solomon Islands,” Li said, describing it as a “historic achievement under the Belt and Road initiative.”
Solomon Islands signed a security deal with China last year, prompting concern from western countries over Beijing’s rising influence in the Pacific region. Earlier this year prime minister Manasseh Sogavare met president Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing as the two countries appeared to draw closer. Sogavare switched diplomatic ties from Taiwan to Beijing in 2019.
“Our relationship has grown stronger in just a matter of a few years since the establishment of diplomatic relations,” Sogavare said at the stadium opening.
Associate professor at the University of Hawaii’s Center for Pacific Islands Studies, Tarcisius Tara Kabutaulaka, described China’s support for the games as “shrewd diplomacy.”
“The PRC’s investments in the construction of the stadium and other sports facilities for the Pacific Games is shrewd diplomacy on Beijing’s part.”
“Chinese officials may argue that there are no ‘political conditions’ attached to the assistance, there is no doubt that it strengthens China’s relationship with Solomon Islands,” he says.
Kabutaulaka said the stadium will be “highly visible” and therefore influential as a political tool, that may influence other Pacific nations.
“It is meant to amaze them on what Beijing can do and hence influence the region’s perception of China,” he says.
Many other countries are also chipping in, and last year Australia committed US$17 million to support the Games. Japan, India, Indonesia, South Korea and New Zealand also provided funding for the Games.
COUNTRY ‘NEGLECTED’
Sogavare described hosting the Games as “an investment in the future of our country.” Opposition leader Matthew Wale says the event will “enhance our nation’s image in the region” while voicing concerns about the government’s priorities. In August, critical shortages of medicines at hospitals and health centers were seen across the country.
“Games spending is concentrated in Honiara while the rest of the country is being neglected in terms of development and medical supplies,” Wale says.
Wale also questioned how the facilities will be maintained and funded in the longer term. Peter Kenilorea Jr, also a member of the opposition group, cautioned that maintaining what he described as “vanity infrastructure” facilities post-Games could pose significant financial challenges.
“The question of whether we can host has always been a concern. The simple answer is that we can’t afford it,” Kenilorea Jr says.
Sogavare said the government will develop a “plan for maintaining these facilities,” with China Civil Engineering Construction Corporation (CCECC) to oversee facility maintenance for the next two years.
Former Olympian Primo Higa, who is training Haga and 11 other athletes for the Games, shares enthusiasm for the event while also reflecting on the financial strain.
“Because of the love for the games, even though I have not enough support for my athletes, I keep training them. Sometimes I have to dig deep into my pockets just to keep us going,” he says.
EXCITEMENT TEMPERED WITH CONCERNS
As the Games approach, people in Honiara hold mixed feelings.
School teacher Derek Mai, 52, says many are “excited about the games [but] the high entrance fees make it unaffordable for ordinary citizens.”
“The government should provide reasonable entrance fees for everyone to enjoy the games,” Mai says.
Ticket prices range from SBD200 for the opening and closing ceremony to SBD30 a day for general admission to most venues.
Activist Lawrence Makili, 61, from Malaita Outer Islands, criticized a plan to shorten the academic year due to the Games.
Schools across the country will finish the year around a month earlier to allow some schools in Honiara to be used for Games accommodation, and also to enable people to take part in the event as volunteers or athletes.
“We seem to prioritize a two-week event over the future of our young people. Education shouldn’t be disturbed at all,” he says.
Still, competitor Haga says the Games are an important for the Pacific region.
“I simply can’t wait to meet our Pacific family,” he says.
“I am sure all Pacific athletes are well prepared for the games, and so we are. To me it’s a symbol of unity … We are one people,” he says.
Taiwan’s English education system is being pulled apart by three opposing forces. Bilingual Nation 2030 pulls students toward English and global communication. Artificial Intelligence (AI) readiness pulls them toward digital judgment, verification and AI-mediated work. But Taiwan’s old exam culture pulls them back toward memorization, grammar drills, timed reading and correct answers. If the education system keeps using old exams to define success, it risks producing graduates who are neither genuinely bilingual nor genuinely AI-ready, but trained for tasks machines can already perform. The first force is Bilingual Nation 2030. Launched in 2018, the policy aimed to “help Taiwan’s workforce connect
It seems every few days one bumps into one of those “real man” comments in which Taiwan is urged to “face reality” or similar, and “make a deal,” with the speaker implying that soon it will be too late. “Deal” advocates always present themselves as having a superior grip on reality, and the manly ability to make the “hard choice.” Their testosterone-laden language often echoes that of Taiwan sellout advocates. Note that such commentary always specifies a process (“make a deal, work with, make progress”), never the end state of what occupation by a violent authoritarian colonialist state will entail. In
There are shadowy cabals plotting to sell out Taiwan to be annexed by China, by invasion if necessary. Fortunately, they are buffoons. In 2019, former Bamboo Union gangster and founder of the China Unification Promotion Party (CUPP), Chang An-le (張安樂, colorfully known as “White Wolf”), led a protest at the Legislative Yuan against comments made by then-premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) that in the event of an attack by China, he would never surrender, but would protect the nation by fighting to the end, even if he only had a broom. Chang had party members bring a wooden casket that they
June 1 to June 7 "If all Taiwanese were as afraid of dying as you, then what would happen?” Physician Shih Chiang-nan (施江南) reportedly said this to his wife Chen Chiao-tung (陳焦桐) after she urged him to stop intervening on behalf of Taiwanese soldiers stranded overseas after serving in the Japanese Army during World War II. Shih had clashed with high-ranking officials over the issue, engaged in several heated arguments with Taiwan governor-general Chen Yi (陳儀) and allegedly shouted at general Ko Yuan-fen (柯遠芬), chief of staff of the Taiwan Garrison Command, over
RSS