Earlier this year former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) lead a delegation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), proclaiming for the millionth time that the people on both sides of the strait are “Chinese” and arguing for “peace.” This month, he lead an “exchange” program of students and teachers from the PRC to Taiwan to visit major tourist sites and have exchanges with students.
Ma said in his application to the government that the purpose of the trip was that the PRC participants “would learn about the local culture and people of Taiwan, and pass on positive messages to promote the better development of cross-strait relations.”
Note that, for Ma, Taiwan has only “local culture.” It has long been his policy to treat Taiwan’s unique culture as a subset of Chinese culture. Ironically, the party is visiting Sun Moon Lake (日月潭) and Jioufen (九份), two sites whose modern configuration is a bequest of Japanese colonialism, one of the many sources of Taiwan’s difference.
Photo: Hua Meng-ching, Taipei Times
‘UNITED FRONT’ WORK
The final group, approved by the government, consisted of 37 teachers and students from five universities in China. A legislator from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) quoted in the Taipei Times said last month that: “Our understanding is that some of the students were chosen in their early years at universities by Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officers at each school to be groomed for party membership.”
These contentions probably have some basis in fact, since there is no way random students and teachers from the PRC would ever be permitted to visit Taiwan in a group like this. As John Dotson noted in an excellent piece published in April by the Global Taiwan Institute, these exchanges are “carefully controlled and stage-managed by organizations within the CCP’s ‘united front work’ (統戰工作) bureaucracy. Within this framework, ‘youth exchanges’ (青年交流) are a major focus of united front work.”
Photo courtesy of the KMT
Since this is an obvious “united front” operation against Taiwan, the phrase “better development of cross-strait relations” can only mean movement toward the annexation of Taiwan. This phrase is a common high-sounding euphemism: whenever the words “cross-strait progress” or similar are invoked, one should ask “toward what end?”
Less often challenged is Ma’s absurd claim that the students learning about the “local culture and people of Taiwan” will promote better relations. It seems almost axiomatic, one widely repeated by commentators, and yet it is utter nonsense.
Consider: it’s 2023 and there are over 300,000 wives from the PRC married to local men. Some of them have even formed their own pro-PRC political party. Did they communicate nothing about the PRC to locals? Taiwan’s universities once hosted thousands of PRC students as well.
Consider too: millions of Taiwanese have lived, worked, run factories and businesses and toured in the PRC. Remember when the Hong Kong-Taipei air route was the busiest on earth? There’s a large population of Taiwanese expats there today, in addition to people working temporarily. Tens of billions in trade takes place annually.
Taiwanese have been visiting China since the 1990s in large numbers, but family visits have been permitted since 1987. That decision, as several scholars have noted, was the moment Taiwanese began to realize how deeply different the two societies were, a key factor in the democratic and culture shifts of the 1990s.
All these Taiwanese know China well.
Even if no one ever crossed the strait, Taiwanese would still know China intimately. The media reports on the PRC incessantly. PRC entities advertise on most major social media platforms, and own many of the social media that Taiwanese use daily, including shopping and video platforms. Taiwanese gamers play an enormous variety of PRC-made video games, through which they interact with official interpretations of Chinese history and culture, along with innumerable PRC citizens. Taiwanese encounter PRC nationals as they travel, do business and attend universities all over the world.
This experience calls into question the unspoken assumption of such exchanges that if the two sides know each other better, the tensions will ease. Reality is just the opposite. The more the Taiwanese see of the PRC, the less they want to be part of it. Witness the recent exodus of Taiwanese from the PRC in the wake of the horrible lockdowns and the increasingly stringent security state.
UNFAVORABLE VIEWS
They are hardly alone. A widely-cited Pew poll released on Wednesday showed that Americans of Chinese origin had extremely unfavorable views of China, unlike other immigrant groups who generally held their homelands in high regard. Chinese regularly emigrate to freer countries.
Of course, Hong Kong residents are now voting with their feet, with large numbers either leaving or looking for a way out. Hong Kong is often cited as an analogue of Taiwan’s future.
Nor can the PRC be said to be ignorant of Taiwan. They have similarly wide contacts with Taiwanese. Taiwanese and PRC researchers study every aspect of each other’s culture, politics, economy and military. The two sides know each other well.
All these intimate, variegated contacts of Taiwanese with the PRC have taken place even as the PRC has ramped up tensions with Taiwan and built up its military for the last two decades. It is not difficult to see that mutual copious, fine-grained knowledge has not lead to reductions in tensions. Quite the opposite.
People-to-people exchanges cannot reduce tensions because tensions are caused by the desire of CCP elites to kill Taiwanese (and their own people) to annex Taiwan. When those decisions change, tensions will ease.
Ma’s reasonable-sounding excuses for the “exchange” trip must be viewed in that light. Ma does not need to engage in stunts to stay relevant politically as he remains a potent force within the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) — his hatchet man, former KMT secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰), is the party’s presidential campaign manager. He certainly knows his trip will have no effect on the PRC-Taiwan relationship. Is he openly leading a training trip for future Taiwan experts of the PRC, helping them to cultivate contacts and spread disinformation?
Surely he must know that this exchange is merely another “united front” operation to the PRC. In other words, it sure looks like just another indicator of the willingness of the KMT leadership to front for CCP interests in Taiwan.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
It starts out as a heartwarming clip. A young girl, clearly delighted to be in Tokyo, beams as she makes a peace sign to the camera. Seconds later, she is shoved to the ground from behind by a woman wearing a surgical mask. The assailant doesn’t skip a beat, striding out of shot of the clip filmed by the girl’s mother. This was no accidental clash of shoulders in a crowded place, but one of the most visible examples of a spate of butsukari otoko — “bumping man” — shoving incidents in Japan that experts attribute to a combination of gender
The race for New Taipei City mayor is being keenly watched, and now with the nomination of former deputy mayor of Taipei Hammer Lee (李四川) as the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate, the battle lines are drawn. All polling data on the tight race mentioned in this column is from the March 12 Formosa poll. On Christmas Day 2010, Taipei County merged into one mega-metropolis of four million people, making it the nation’s largest city. The same day, the winner of the mayoral race, Eric Chu (朱立倫) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), took office and insisted on the current
Last week the government announced that by year’s end Taiwan will have the highest density of anti-ship missiles in the world. Its inventory could exceed 1,400, or enough for the opening two hours of an invasion from the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Snark aside, it sounds impressive. But an important piece is missing. Lost in all the “dialogues” and “debates” and “discussions” whose sole purpose is simply to dawdle and delay is what the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) alternative special defense budget proposal means for the defense of Taiwan. It is a betrayal of both Taiwan and the US. IT’S
March 16 to March 22 Hidden for decades behind junk-filled metal shacks, trees and overgrowth, a small domed structure bearing a Buddhist swastika resurfaced last June in a Taichung alley. It was soon identified as a remnant of the 122-year-old Gokokuzan Taichuu-ji (Taichung Temple, 護國山台中寺), which was thought to have been demolished in the 1980s. In addition, a stone stele dedicated to monk Hoshu Ono, who served as abbot from 1914 to 1930, was discovered in the detritus. The temple was established in 1903 as the local center for the Soto school
RSS