In 2020, Lia Tsai (蔡利亞) decided to buy pet insurance after her Himalayan cat racked up a staggering NT$100,000 (US$3,340) in vet bills within its first year. A host of medical problems, including mold in its fluffy long fur, quickly became rows and rows of expenses tracked in her Excel spreadsheet.
After talking to an insurance agent who recommended the company’s most expensive plan, she sat down and began an intense one-night research session. Well versed in personal insurance, she read through each plan’s terms and conditions and realized that many of the advertised offerings were extraneous.
“If I don’t have a dog that roams outside or bites people, why would I need third-party liability insurance?” Tsai says.
Photo: Deanna Durben
That NT$200,000 provision made up 80 percent of the plan’s advertised maximum payout.
Pet insurance can save money and alleviate much of the financial stress around vet visits — but only if buyers are shrewd. With varying options and benefits, it’s easy to be misled by high maximums and flashy perks without considering if they actually suit your needs. Furthermore, insurance won’t cover common preventative care. Or cancer.
It raises the question of whether Taiwanese pet insurance in its current form is even worth it for the average cat or dog owner. (Iguana or clownfish owners are out of luck, as there’s no insurance for rarer pets.) Or if saving money the old-fashioned way is still better.
Photo: Deanna Durben
‘PEACE OF MIND’
Pet insurance is classified under property insurance, and mainly covers sickness or accidental damage. No preventative care is covered — vaccinations, deworming and needed nutritional supplements.
Furthermore, spaying/neutering and pregnancy-related care are considered elective. So is treatment for gum disease, which a majority of pets develop as they grow older.
Photo courtesy of Lia Tsai
Unlike human life insurance plans, yearly renewal is required. This means the companies can arbitrarily reject anyone deemed a liability, including any pet that has a chronic illness or racked up astronomical payouts the previous year.
Tsai originally settled on a cheap NT$600 plan with 50 percent coinsurance, to continue treating her cat’s myriad ongoing problems. When she applied for renewal the following year, they increased her premium to NT$900.
Seven companies offered pet insurance two years ago, when the industry was just beginning to gain traction, but the playing field has since thinned to three providers.
Photo: Deanna Durben
A typical plan costs around NT$3,000 for pets under 8. It includes up to NT$2,000 per vet visit, NT$10,000 for overnight stays and NT$50,000 for surgery. Other perks like liability, cremation fees or even locating a missing pet, vary widely between plans.
Halfway house Furiend (狗抵家) owner Hsiao Mei-fang (蕭媚方) also bought pet insurance after her dog had a series of skin problems. That year, they didn’t visit the vet once.
Nevertheless, Hsiao also insured her other two dogs the following year, after discovering a special mixed-breed policy (costing NT$$937 for their age bracket). It insures up to NT$1,100 per vet visit, but they’ve only had to go three times.
“Buying some peace of mind is definitely worth it,” Hsiao says. “Even though we didn’t use the insurance, at least we never had to worry about something happening to our pets.”
RAINY DAY FUND
However, having peace of mind means the exact opposite decision for Chiu Yan (邱雁).
Chiu, who owns four cats, says that “simply putting money aside is the most practical choice.” With varying coverage for different illnesses and treatments, it’s hard to predict what reimbursement applications will be accepted, she says, which can result in unexpected high costs.
“Your pet being sick is stressful and chaotic enough, without having to guess what procedures are covered,” Chiu says.
Furthermore, most plans stop coverage at the age of 10 or 12. Chiu couldn’t insure her oldest 14-year-old cat even if she wanted to.
Yet older pets are more likely to develop serious problems. Chiu’s cats had minimal expenses before the age of seven, then one major problem costing around NT$20,000 every two years.
Instead, Chiu has a bank account earmarked for pet care.
“Having the discipline to save regularly can be a challenge,” she says, but she believes it’s a better choice.
She saves NT$1,000 per month per cat.
“Twelve thousand per year may seem excessive in their young years, but it makes more sense than buying an insurance policy you don’t need,” she says, choosing to slowly accumulate an emergency fund.
Simple saving is an option that definitely bears consideration — and inevitably must happen as pets age out of coverage.
Insurance is a choice based on individual situations, although agents working on commission will inevitably try to convince you otherwise. In popular pet Facebook groups like Love Cat Club (愛貓聯盟), which has almost half a million members, posting anything about insurance will garner a barrage of enthusiastic comments or messages from agents.
Tsai made a popular post in 2020 detailing the restrictions and drawbacks of pet insurance — often hidden in the fine print. As thankful comments piled up, so did angry messages from insurance reps asking her to remove the post, even though she was just compiling publicly available information.
FINDING GOOD ADVICE
Good advice is hard to find. Other players in the pet care business, like pet stores and veterinary practices, don’t seem to get involved.
“It’s a purely economic decision for pet owners,” says veterinarian Yen chin-fang (顏進芳) of Tzu-en Animal Hospital (慈恩動物醫院), “so we don’t get involved.”
Clinics merely provide a receipt and diagnostic report, which can cost between NT$200 and NT$500.
When buying her current plan, Tsai asked a non-affiliated agent to present all the options, then went home to decide what policy actually fit her cat’s needs. She ended up with a NT$3,000 plan that has more than paid for itself.
Both dismissing insurance’s potential benefits and blindly buying can be foolish choices. Pet owners should analyze their own expenses and future expectations to see if any available insurance offerings match their needs.
Skipping careful consideration could leave someone missing out on major compensation or, as Tsai puts it, “subsidizing those of us who do use the insurance.”
This year will go down in the history books. Taiwan faces enormous turmoil and uncertainty in the coming months. Which political parties are in a good position to handle big changes? All of the main parties are beset with challenges. Taking stock, this column examined the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) (“Huang Kuo-chang’s choking the life out of the TPP,” May 28, page 12), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) (“Challenges amid choppy waters for the DPP,” June 14, page 12) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) (“KMT struggles to seize opportunities as ‘interesting times’ loom,” June 20, page 11). Times like these can
June 23 to June 29 After capturing the walled city of Hsinchu on June 22, 1895, the Japanese hoped to quickly push south and seize control of Taiwan’s entire west coast — but their advance was stalled for more than a month. Not only did local Hakka fighters continue to cause them headaches, resistance forces even attempted to retake the city three times. “We had planned to occupy Anping (Tainan) and Takao (Kaohsiung) as soon as possible, but ever since we took Hsinchu, nearby bandits proclaiming to be ‘righteous people’ (義民) have been destroying train tracks and electrical cables, and gathering in villages
Dr. Y. Tony Yang, Associate Dean of Health Policy and Population Science at George Washington University, argued last week in a piece for the Taipei Times about former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) leading a student delegation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that, “The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world” (“Ma’s Visit, DPP’s Blind Spot,” June 18, page 8). Yang contends that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has a blind spot: “By treating any
Swooping low over the banks of a Nile River tributary, an aid flight run by retired American military officers released a stream of food-stuffed sacks over a town emptied by fighting in South Sudan, a country wracked by conflict. Last week’s air drop was the latest in a controversial development — private contracting firms led by former US intelligence officers and military veterans delivering aid to some of the world’s deadliest conflict zones, in operations organized with governments that are combatants in the conflicts. The moves are roiling the global aid community, which warns of a more militarized, politicized and profit-seeking trend
RSS