It always nice to bask in the warm afterglow of another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) fubar, this time the defeat of all four of the referendums that it had promoted and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) had opposed.
The DPP displayed competence, changing strategies when it needed to and effectively motivating its somewhat younger base than the KMT, a base that is more likely to live far from where it has household registry than the older KMT base and thus, is more difficult to get out. Kudos to the DPP.
This was a performance that Taiwan needed: the ractopamine pork referendum might have caused unnecessary trouble with US, while re-opening the dilapidated and dangerous fourth nuclear plant was simply a bad idea. A defeat for the DPP might have invigorated the KMT as well; certainly it would have given that ally of Beijing an additional club with which to bash the pro-Taiwan side.
Photo: Liu Hsin-te, Taipei Times
Years ago, the midwife of Taiwan’s democracy, Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), remarked that if he was Moses leading Taiwan out of bondage, then Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), who succeeded him as president, was Joshua, leading Taiwan into the promised land. Lee, who used to criss-cross the island giving sermons on humility and public service, understood his place in history. But if the story of Taiwan’s democratization contains a Joshua to Lee’s Moses, that figure is President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), not Chen.
CULTIVATING RELATIONS
At home, Tsai has presided over a consolidation of the nation’s democracy with successful, clean, regular, even dull elections. Abroad, her calm demeanor and cultivation of good relations with the US and Japan and pursuit of relations with the world by other means has elevated Taiwan’s stance in the world, such as its city-to-city initiatives, highlighted last Wednesday in the Taipei Times (“Cities can expand Taiwan’s role,” Marcin Jerzewski and Huynh Tam Sang).
Photo: Lee Hui-chou, Taipei Times
As much as by what she has done, Tsai’s success has been defined by what she has not done, by things that didn’t happen. In February of 2008, as his presidency was in its final year, Chen flew out to Itu Aba Island (Taiping Island, 太平島), ostensibly for the opening ceremony of an airstrip there. It was a useless stunt that drew unnecessary attention to the island claims of the Republic of China (ROC). A piece in the international media called it a “stick-in-your-eye move by Chen” to the other South China Sea claimants, one that, even worse, aligned Taiwan with China.
Tsai has never engaged in stunts like that. Instead, she has made the ROC’s absurd and dangerous South China Sea claims largely disappear from public and international discourse. They have largely been a non-controversy.
Similarly, during the Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) era, the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) were a prominent irritant in relations between Taipei and Tokyo.
Aside from a couple of pro forma assertions of ROC sovereignty over the isles (most recently in June of last year), they too have gone into hibernation. Instead, on Friday the DPP and its counterpart ruling party in Japan, the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), had another 2+2 meeting to discuss trade. The meeting was just another signal of the warm relations between the two states.
China’s aggression, expansionism, and arrogant blustering, of course, are partly responsible for Taiwan’s surging profile on the world stage. Yet, it is easy to imagine what stunts Chen might have pulled with a similarly fecund ground to till, how he might have chilled support and drawn attention to himself rather than Taiwan. Instead, Tsai’s low profile has enabled Taiwan to shine.
SUCCESSFUL TRANSITION
At home, Tsai and Taiwan’s democracy have both been helped by China’s threats toward the nation, which have helped build a Taiwanese identity and make it increasingly difficult for the KMT, allied to Beijing, to compete at the national level.
Yet, Tsai served as DPP chair during the bleak opening years of the Ma era, when the DPP had to rebuild after the Chen chased the golden calf and Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) lost in the 2008 election. That period was also vital for another reason — it saw the transition of the party from the period when it had been led by the older generation of dissidents and lawyers to its current generation of leaders.
Had the DPP fallen apart at that time, things might have gone ill for Taiwan and its democracy.
Instead, as scholar Austin Wang observed in “The Emergence of Tsai Ing-wen and the Presidentialization of DPP, 2008-2016,” Tsai beat back the party factions and their centrifugal tendencies that threatened to tear the party apart and centralized the DPP into a machine led by the president. Again, Tsai should be honored for what didn’t happen.
A less remarked on aspect of Tsai’s effect on Taiwan’s democracy: I know women who had voted blue their whole lives, who switched to voting for Tsai because she was a female (will they switch back in 2024?). When voters switch parties, it opens up new possibilities. Tsai’s light blue appeal is not limited to females: for a brief moment in 2008 she was mentioned as a possible running mate for Ma!
Remember too when DPP elder Koo Kwang-ming (辜寬敏) ran against Tsai for DPP chairperson in 2008, saying that unmarried women shouldn’t lead? Few publicly say that anymore. Tsai struck a blow against sexism in politics.
‘WE VOTE’
During the Ma years, the nation became ever more Taiwanese even as he tried to nudge it closer to China. Tsai was the DPP leader during that period and its presidential candidate during the 2012 campaign. Nicknamed “Little Ing” (小英) during that election, it would not have been difficult, with good marketing, for her to try to get herself identified with the party and the cause, personality-cult style. She avoided attempting that, which would have been very damaging for the party and for Taiwan’s democracy.
Last week I asked my students how they knew they were Taiwanese. One young woman promptly offered: “We vote.” Voting, like the round the island bicycle ride, has become more than just a way to select leaders, it is now a form of participation in the Taiwanese identity.
That is due, in part, to Tsai’s quiet, competent management of the way the DPP and Taiwan’s democracy have interacted for the last 13 years, avoiding all the things that might have happened, but didn’t.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
In Taiwan there are two economies: the shiny high tech export economy epitomized by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) and its outsized effect on global supply chains, and the domestic economy, driven by construction and powered by flows of gravel, sand and government contracts. The latter supports the former: we can have an economy without TSMC, but we can’t have one without construction. The labor shortage has heavily impacted public construction in Taiwan. For example, the first phase of the MRT Wanda Line in Taipei, originally slated for next year, has been pushed back to 2027. The government
July 22 to July 28 The Love River’s (愛河) four-decade run as the host of Kaohsiung’s annual dragon boat races came to an abrupt end in 1971 — the once pristine waterway had become too polluted. The 1970 event was infamous for the putrid stench permeating the air, exacerbated by contestants splashing water and sludge onto the shore and even the onlookers. The relocation of the festivities officially marked the “death” of the river, whose condition had rapidly deteriorated during the previous decade. The myriad factories upstream were only partly to blame; as Kaohsiung’s population boomed in the 1960s, all household
Allegations of corruption against three heavyweight politicians from the three major parties are big in the news now. On Wednesday, prosecutors indicted Hsinchu County Commissioner Yang Wen-ke (楊文科) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), a judgment is expected this week in the case involving Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and former deputy premier and Taoyuan Mayor Cheng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is being held incommunicado in prison. Unlike the other two cases, Cheng’s case has generated considerable speculation, rumors, suspicions and conspiracy theories from both the pan-blue and pan-green camps.
Stepping inside Waley Art (水谷藝術) in Taipei’s historic Wanhua District (萬華區) one leaves the motorcycle growl and air-conditioner purr of the street and enters a very different sonic realm. Speakers hiss, machines whir and objects chime from all five floors of the shophouse-turned- contemporary art gallery (including the basement). “It’s a bit of a metaphor, the stacking of gallery floors is like the layering of sounds,” observes Australian conceptual artist Samuel Beilby, whose audio installation HZ & Machinic Paragenesis occupies the ground floor of the gallery space. He’s not wrong. Put ‘em in a Box (我們把它都裝在一個盒子裡), which runs until Aug. 18, invites