It’s a day ending in -y in Taiwan, so we all know what President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) satisfaction ratings must be doing: falling. Is that I Got You Babe playing on the radio?
Another round of polls has triggered a furious outbreak of stenography in the local and international media. The Taiwanese Public Opinion Foundation (TPOF) brought out a poll at the end of May which had Tsai’s satisfaction ratings hitting a 21-month low of 45.7 percent. This finding and its framing were widely reported in the media.
Foundation Chairman Michael You (游盈隆) said that such a large change — an 8.7 percent drop — in a short time was rare, but a glance back through the TPOF’s own polls shows such “large” changes are common.
Photo: Liu Hsin-de, Taipei Times
For example, in May of 2019, TPOF released a poll showing Tsai’s approval ratings had risen 8.5 percent in a month. Similarly in June of last year Tsai’s approval rating fell 8.9 percent, driven down by public dissatisfaction with the COVID-19 stimulus. A TPOF poll in September last year had Tsai’s approval falling over 11 percent.
Rapid changes reflect the public’s response to whatever issue has seized the public’s attention, and are hardly abnormal.
What is normal about the TPOF poll was its framing. In its presentation of TPOF polls, both foreign and local media typically omit mention of You’s longstanding beef with Tsai, and his support of presidential candidate William Lai (賴清德), who is currently vice president, in the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) primary before last year’s election.
You’s animus towards Tsai may not affect the numbers, but it does appear to affect the framing of TPOF presentations. The TPOF described the May poll number as a “21-month low,” but the Foundation had Tsai at 56 percent in October, 52 percent in December, and 51 percent in January.
This of course did not stop You from framing the numbers as a “serious alarm bell,” a framing that the foreign media dutifully reproduced, instead of challenging or contextualizing.
In other words, TPOF’s own numbers show that this “low” is in reality a gentle slide of 10 percent in the last 9 months and that the month-to-month variation is entirely unremarkable.
Of course, “entirely unremarkable” doesn’t make good news copy. Nor does TPOF’s polling record, which in May of 2019 had Lai beating Tsai by 12 points in the primary (she won by roughly 8 points) and Lai doing much better against Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) than Tsai.
In 2017, when Tsai’s approval rating dipped below 30 percent, and Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) approval exceeded 68 percent, Chairman You described Ko as a “Godzilla,” saying: “In the history of Taiwan, only one person had a similar level of popularity: James Soong (宋楚瑜).”
Soong would go on to lose in presidential elections more often than any major politician in Taiwanese history.
Meanwhile Tsai hit that level, twice, after the elections in 2016 and last year, as did Lai right after he became premier, in a Taiwan NextGen Foundation poll. Ko’s popularity, by contrast, has been … transient.
After the DPP’s loss in the 2018 local elections, You framed the results of the TPOF’s latest poll in which Tsai’s approval had fallen to 24.3 percent as showing that “the KMT has fully recovered from its bruising defeat in the 2016 elections, while the DPP has slid back to where it was 10 years ago.”
Tsai’s 24.3 percent? As transient as Ko’s popularity. Two years later the “slide back a decade” DPP under Tsai would crush Han in the presidential election and retain control of the legislature. Readers should keep that low number in mind whenever they reflect on Tsai’s current approval levels and the tiresome, antidemocratic glee with which the domestic and international media negatively reports on them.
The polls also vary widely. A February poll by My-Formosa.com, which is usually described as green-leaning in the media, had Tsai at 59 percent. A poll from Blue-leaning TVBS released last month had Tsai at 41 percent.
Simple truth: nothing out of the ordinary is happening. Tsai, like Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) before her, and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) before Ma, started out with high poll ratings, which over the next few months of their administrations fell to more reasonable numbers, then slowly fell from there.
Everyone seems to have forgotten that by September of 2008, not even half a year after his first inauguration, in a Global Views Monthly survey, Ma hit 24.9 percent. That was a year before his disastrous performance during Typhoon Morakot.
Contextualization of these numbers is desperately needed, and will be assiduously neglected by both local and international media. The simple truth is that the Tsai administration’s poll numbers are miraculous compared to the Ma administration’s.
In 2014, after the Sunflower Movement and numerous other issues, then-Premier Jiang Yi-huah’s (江宜樺) ratings fell to 16.4 percent by December, according to Commonwealth Magazine. In 2010, the magazine also wrote that then-premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) had hit 36 percent, while Ma’s premier in 2009 (go ahead, see if you can remember his name) had satisfaction ratings of 27.9 percent.
These are normal numbers for premiers: Tsai’s first premier, Lin Chuan (林全) went out with a 25.9 percent rating in 2017, according to Commonwealth Magazine. Being premier is a thankless task.
The numbers above happened without a long drought, electric power supply troubles and a COVID-19 outbreak.
The recent TPOF poll trumpeting Tsai’s “21-month low” had approval for Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) falling 9.5 percent to around 45 percent. What was the Su cabinet’s satisfaction in March of 2019, according to TPOF? 48 percent.
The TPOF poll that had Tsai at a “21-month low” also had over three-fourths of adults rating the performance of the Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC) at 60 or above on a 0-100 scale, with only 18.9 percent rating it below 60.
In other words, the tale told by these numbers is not one of poll numbers that have “plummeted” or experienced a “sudden drop” as major international papers described it this month.
It is a story of an administration, which despite the usual abuses from China, the ractopork decision, drought, electric power struggles and a year mired in COVID-19 problems, from financial and aid issues to a dangerous outbreak, has managed to maintain ratings in the polls its predecessor administrations can only view with envy.
It is highly likely that Tsai’s poll numbers will continue to decline. COVID-19 case numbers are slowly falling at the moment, implying that there is some possibility the level 3 restrictions may be extended. President Tsai will take the hit for that. The reservoirs got a big boost from the rain this month, which won’t help her much because the public will perceive it as returning to normality.
The one thing we can count on, though, is that the local and international media will continue to report with glee on her perpetually falling poll numbers. I’ll turn over to smash that radio now.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
Sept. 1 to Sept. 7 In 1899, Kozaburo Hirai became the first documented Japanese to wed a Taiwanese under colonial rule. The soldier was partly motivated by the government’s policy of assimilating the Taiwanese population through intermarriage. While his friends and family disapproved and even mocked him, the marriage endured. By 1930, when his story appeared in Tales of Virtuous Deeds in Taiwan, Hirai had settled in his wife’s rural Changhua hometown, farming the land and integrating into local society. Similarly, Aiko Fujii, who married into the prominent Wufeng Lin Family (霧峰林家) in 1927, quickly learned Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese) and
The low voter turnout for the referendum on Aug. 23 shows that many Taiwanese are apathetic about nuclear energy, but there are long-term energy stakes involved that the public needs to grasp Taiwan faces an energy trilemma: soaring AI-driven demand, pressure to cut carbon and reliance on fragile fuel imports. But the nuclear referendum on Aug. 23 showed how little this registered with voters, many of whom neither see the long game nor grasp the stakes. Volunteer referendum worker Vivian Chen (陳薇安) put it bluntly: “I’ve seen many people asking what they’re voting for when they arrive to vote. They cast their vote without even doing any research.” Imagine Taiwanese voters invited to a poker table. The bet looked simple — yes or no — yet most never showed. More than two-thirds of those
In the run-up to the referendum on re-opening Pingtung County’s Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant last month, the media inundated us with explainers. A favorite factoid of the international media, endlessly recycled, was that Taiwan has no energy reserves for a blockade, thus necessitating re-opening the nuclear plants. As presented by the Chinese-language CommonWealth Magazine, it runs: “According to the US Department of Commerce International Trade Administration, 97.73 percent of Taiwan’s energy is imported, and estimates are that Taiwan has only 11 days of reserves available in the event of a blockade.” This factoid is not an outright lie — that
The People’s Republic of China (PRC) yesterday paraded its military hardware in an effort to impress its own population, intimidate its enemies and rewrite history. As always, this was paced by a blizzard of articles and commentaries in the media, a reminder that Beijing’s lies must be accompanied by a bodyguard of lies. A typical example is this piece by Zheng Wang (汪錚) of Seton Hall in the Diplomat. “In Taiwan, 2025 also marks 80 years since the island’s return to China at the end of the war — a historical milestone largely omitted in official commemorations.” The reason for its
RSS