It is not often to hear someone talk about how much they enjoyed their time in quarantine — but Pichet Klunchun, a Thai dancer/choreographer/artist, has built his career by going against convention and conventional thinking.
I caught up with Pichet — who is back in town to perform his latest work, No. 60, this weekend as part of the Taipei Arts Festival — by telephone on Saturday last week, just after he had moved out of his quarantine hotel.
Spending 14 days in isolation — even from the other dancer who will be performing with him — was a chance for some quiet reflection, Pichet said.
Photo courtesy of Hideto Maezawa
“I really enjoyed it, because in my life I am always in the studio, always practicing,” he said before adding one very large caveat: “But if this was before 2020, I think I would have died — no Internet, no Messenger, nothing.”
And this from a man who when he is not choreographing, performing, teaching or running his own theater in Bangkok, has also become a well-known painter.
It is a good thing he came through quarantine with a positive outlook, because he and his team face another round of 14 days in quarantine when they return to Bangkok.
Photo courtesy of Hideto Maezawa
But first, there are two shows to do for the festival, only the second time — technically — that his company has presented No. 60, which had its world premiere in Japan at TPAM (Performing Arts Meeting in Yokohama) on Feb. 15.
It was presented in October last year as a “work-in-progress” at the Esplanade — Theatres on the Bay in Singapore as part of the da:ns festival.
While the show is very new, the ideas behind it date back to 2001.
“The concept of No. 60 was trying to find a way to understand my dance technique, from the traditional movements. I am looking back into my work: I am a demon, Black & White, Chui Chai,” he said.
Pichet began training in Thailand’s classical Khon mask dance when he was 16 and earned a bachelor’s degree in traditional Thai dance, spending years learning the Theppanom canon of basic poses and movements.
However, by the time he won an Asian Cultural Council fellowship for stays in New York City and at UCLA, he was looking for ways to deconstruct Khon and introduce contemporary movements to it — and his exposure to the Western modern dance world in the Big Apple galvanized him.
He has said before that he found freedom in deconstruction.
For example, in 2006’s I am a demon, he explored different facets of the Khon characters and using various scientific ideas to demonstrate the vitality of each character. In 2011’s Black & White, he used battle scenes familiar to generations of Thais from temple murals of the Ramayana to explore the equilibrium of opposing forces.
More than a decade ago, he also started drawing, making diagrams as a way of figuring out the ways dancers shape and form their bodies in Thai classical dance, a practice that has become a crucial component of his research and explorations.
His notebooks of the drawings and diagrams have been published in book form and displayed in exhibitions about his work.
“In 2016, I wrote all the diagrams [for No. 60], and started production in 2019 to create the show,” Pichet said.
He explored six concepts that are central to his life as a dancer, to all dancers, he said.
The first is freedom — “freedom of mind, body, movement;” second is understanding the body as a dancer; third is beauty; fourth is independent solos, improvisation; fifth is thinking of something new and sixth is acceptance of yourself, of other people, “allowing each other to be part of the creation, of the world,” he said.
So how did you get from six to the 60 in the title, I asked.
In the traditional Khon vocabulary there are 59 poses that every dancer must memorize, he said.
It is their toolbox, so to speak.
By rethinking and reimagining the basics, Pichet said he hoped he might come up with a new set of principles, a new philosophy for young Thai classical dancers.
“I was looking for No. 60 — the concept of knowledge, of a way to take you back into the movement,” he said. “Unfortunately, I could not find it.”
So the search for No. 60 could perhaps be a metaphor for life?
“Your No. 60 and my No. 60 are different,” he said with a laugh.
While Pichet uses Kornkarn Rungsawang from his Pichet Klunchun Dance Company in the piece, he turned to London-born, Singapore-based freelance sound artist Zai Tang for the soundscape and young Taiwanese lighting designer Ray Tseng (曾睿琁) for the set design and lighting — a reflection of his long-time interest in intercultural exchange.
His willingness to push boundaries, explore different media and cultures has been what has brought him so often to Taiwan over the years, from his first appearance with the Novel Hall Dance Series with French choreographer Jerome Bel in Pichet Klunchun and Myself, to his company’s terrific Dancing With Death at the Cloud Gate Theater in August 2017, to his various collaborations with Taiwanese dancer/choreographer Chen Wu-kang (陳武康) in the past few years.
Pichet said that he and Zai worked together in Bangkok as No. 60 took shape, discussing what Khon music is and how it relates to the traditional movements and how to use each element.
However, that does not mean that audiences will be hearing a lot of “traditional” music from Zai, who shares the stage with Pichet and Kornkarn.
“I love the music, he worked very hard on it,” Pichet said.
No. 60 runs 60 minutes, without intermission, and comes with the warning that latecomers will not be admitted.
This story has been updated since it was first published.
Taiwan’s English education system is being pulled apart by three opposing forces. Bilingual Nation 2030 pulls students toward English and global communication. Artificial Intelligence (AI) readiness pulls them toward digital judgment, verification and AI-mediated work. But Taiwan’s old exam culture pulls them back toward memorization, grammar drills, timed reading and correct answers. If the education system keeps using old exams to define success, it risks producing graduates who are neither genuinely bilingual nor genuinely AI-ready, but trained for tasks machines can already perform. The first force is Bilingual Nation 2030. Launched in 2018, the policy aimed to “help Taiwan’s workforce connect
It seems every few days one bumps into one of those “real man” comments in which Taiwan is urged to “face reality” or similar, and “make a deal,” with the speaker implying that soon it will be too late. “Deal” advocates always present themselves as having a superior grip on reality, and the manly ability to make the “hard choice.” Their testosterone-laden language often echoes that of Taiwan sellout advocates. Note that such commentary always specifies a process (“make a deal, work with, make progress”), never the end state of what occupation by a violent authoritarian colonialist state will entail. In
“Taiwan’s Opposition Leader Comes to US With a Message Straight Out of Beijing” read a May 31 headline in the Wall Street Journal. Top US administration officials and members of Congress almost certainly read the WSJ, and if there was a bullet point takeaway that people in Washington should absorb ahead of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chair Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) arrival in DC on June 9, that headline is it. The last few columns have discussed this very topic, and the timing is not coincidental. While those top officials likely do not read the Taipei Times, judging by the number
As someone who normally steers clear of books with “transcendence” or “metaphysics” in their subtitles, this reviewer — a casual observer of local belief systems since the 1990s — found Fabian Graham’s Money God Temples in Taiwan a challenging read. Those who’ve only dipped their toes into temple culture will likely need to parse several sections with special care if they’re to keep up with the author, a British ethnographic researcher whose previous books have investigated religious practices among ethnic Chinese in Southeast Asia. This scholarly volume examines a facet of Taiwan’s religious landscape that didn’t exist a century ago, and