In 2002, Cheng Hsing-tse (鄭性澤) was convicted of killing a policeman in a gunfight at a karaoke bar. He was sentenced to death by the Supreme Court in 2006. But a decade later, Cheng walked out a free man after the Taiwan High Court overturned his conviction.
Cheng is one of eight defendants who have been exonerated through the work of the Taiwan Innocence Project (台灣冤獄平反協會, TIP). Inspired by the Innocence Project in the US, the non-government organization was established in 2012 and provides legal assistance to defendants in cases where they have been wrongfully convicted.
Cheng’s story, as well as the plight of other wrongfully convicted individuals and the impact on their loved ones and society are the focus of the first Innocence Film Festival organized by the TIP, which opens tomorrow. Admission is free for all screenings, which will take place at the Spot Huashan Cinema.
Photo courtesy of Taiwan Innocence Project
The theme of “What If” goes back to the pivotal moment when the lives of these defendants changed forever, and invites audiences to consider what the world would be like if the truth is not always as it appears to be.
In Cheng’s case, the TIP identified issues of unlawful interrogation, forced confession and misapplication of forensic science analysis in the original trial. A key detail was the flawed gunshot trajectory analysis used in his trial. After re-examining the evidence, the prosecution filed for retrial, and Cheng was eventually cleared of his crime.
“The judiciary must deeply engrave this in its the soul: how humble people become when they are before you. The way that autumn frost disappears without a sound, that’s also how people are before the judiciary,” writer and activist Chang Chuan-fen (張娟芬) said of the incident, as a reminder of the sacred power of the judiciary. Chang was one of the earliest individuals to start working on Cheng’s case.
Photo courtesy of Taiwan Innocence Project
Documentary Cheng Hsing-tse’s 48 Hours (鄭性澤的48小時) will screen as part of a Taiwan short film selection at 2:30pm on Saturday. Other cases explored in the selection are that of Chen Yen-fei (陳燕飛) in On the Flyway Home (飛燕歸巢), Su Bing-kun (蘇炳坤) in Where Can the Dust Alight (何處惹塵埃) and Lu Chin-kai (呂金鎧), who is still serving out a 20-year prison sentence for rape and murder, in The Sound of Silence (無聲時刻).
Other films look at how wrongful convictions have unfolded around the world. The Central Park Five is an award-winning documentary by US filmmakers Ken Burns, David McMahon and Sarah Burns that follows the fates of four African American and two Hispanic American teenagers convicted for the rape and assault of a white female jogger.
The case became a lightning rod for discussions of racial discrimination in the justice system, and received renewed attention when it became the subject of a Netflix drama series earlier this year.
Photo courtesy of Taiwan Innocence Project
Out of Thin Air looks at the 1974 Guomundur and Geirfinnur case in Iceland, when two manual laborers disappeared under mysterious circumstances. Despite a lack of any bodies, six people were convicted for the murders. Five were acquitted last year.
From Japan, the documentary Gokutomo, or “prison friends,” follows the unlikely friendship that formed between five men, all convicted of murder, who found solace and support in each other throughout their years in prison, despite maintaining their innocence. Promise: The Nabari Poisoned Wine Case, the Life of a Death-row Inmate looks at a death-row prisoner who was still fighting a 1961 conviction for murder when he died in prison in 2015.
While an interest in true crime may be enough to draw audiences in, the films will also invite deeper reflection on how the legal system and society at large carry out justice, and how grace is maintained in the face of injustice.
When Taiwan was battered by storms this summer, the only crumb of comfort I could take was knowing that some advice I’d drafted several weeks earlier had been correct. Regarding the Southern Cross-Island Highway (南橫公路), a spectacular high-elevation route connecting Taiwan’s southwest with the country’s southeast, I’d written: “The precarious existence of this road cannot be overstated; those hoping to drive or ride all the way across should have a backup plan.” As this article was going to press, the middle section of the highway, between Meishankou (梅山口) in Kaohsiung and Siangyang (向陽) in Taitung County, was still closed to outsiders
US President Donald Trump may have hoped for an impromptu talk with his old friend Kim Jong-un during a recent trip to Asia, but analysts say the increasingly emboldened North Korean despot had few good reasons to join the photo-op. Trump sent repeated overtures to Kim during his barnstorming tour of Asia, saying he was “100 percent” open to a meeting and even bucking decades of US policy by conceding that North Korea was “sort of a nuclear power.” But Pyongyang kept mum on the invitation, instead firing off missiles and sending its foreign minister to Russia and Belarus, with whom it
President William Lai (賴清德) has championed Taiwan as an “AI Island” — an artificial intelligence (AI) hub powering the global tech economy. But without major shifts in talent, funding and strategic direction, this vision risks becoming a static fortress: indispensable, yet immobile and vulnerable. It’s time to reframe Taiwan’s ambition. Time to move from a resource-rich AI island to an AI Armada. Why change metaphors? Because choosing the right metaphor shapes both understanding and strategy. The “AI Island” frames our national ambition as a static fortress that, while valuable, is still vulnerable and reactive. Shifting our metaphor to an “AI Armada”
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has a dystopian, radical and dangerous conception of itself. Few are aware of this very fundamental difference between how they view power and how the rest of the world does. Even those of us who have lived in China sometimes fall back into the trap of viewing it through the lens of the power relationships common throughout the rest of the world, instead of understanding the CCP as it conceives of itself. Broadly speaking, the concepts of the people, race, culture, civilization, nation, government and religion are separate, though often overlapping and intertwined. A government
RSS