Dec. 18 to Dec. 24
Although his multiple uprisings barely got off the ground, Lo Fu-hsing (羅福星) stood defiant while facing his Japanese captors. Arrested in Tamsui on Dec. 18, 1913, he was sentenced to death the following March.
According to Japanese records, a prison guard asked him if he thought what he did was an unpardonable crime.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
“I’m just exercising my rights to freedom and equality,” Lo said. “I don’t think that constitutes criminal activity.
The guard told Lo that the Japanese government was providing Taiwanese with a good living, “but you claim the opposite, and that is merely your personal bias. Will you still not admit your crimes?”
Lo answered that he accepted the verdict and if he wasn’t put to death he would not be able to face his comrades who had already been executed.
Photo: Tsai Cheng-min, Taipei Times
“No matter how harsh the punishment, I do not think I committed any crime,” he repeated.
FAILURE TO LAUNCH
Lo was born in today’s Jakarta, the son of a Chinese businessman and a local woman with partial Dutch ancestry — hence his unique appearance. He returned to China at a young age, and in 1903 followed his grandfather to Taiwan at the age of 18. They settled in Miaoli.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
“Although he personally experienced the pain of Taiwanese suffering under Japanese rule, it had yet to awaken his revolutionary spirit,” writes Chin Yi-hui (覃怡輝) in A Study of Lo Fu-hsing’s Anti-Japanese Revolution (羅福星抗日事件革命研究). “His first response was to run away from the suffering, and that’s why he and his grandfather left Taiwan.”
The awakening happened when Lo returned to China in 1906 and joined the Tongmenghui (同盟會, “united league”), a secret society dedicated to the overthrow of the Qing Dynasty. He spent the next few years teaching in Southeast Asia while secretly recruiting troops, leading them back to China to take part in the Second Guangzhou Uprising in April 1911. Lo was among the few to survive this disastrous battle and the Qing Dynasty fell a year later.
He and a few comrades then took the revolution to Taiwan, setting up a Tongmenghui branch in Taipei and carrying out underground activities in today’s Dadaocheng (大稻埕) area in Taipei. Due to his personal connections during his time in Taiwan, Lo had been able to recruit 500 men by April 1913.
Photo: Shih Chih-ju, Taipei Times
“Lo returned to Taiwan a completely different man,” Chin writes.
His first three attempts were suppressed before they got off the ground because Japanese authorities learned of the plans. They were at least twice sold out by their comrades. In September 1913, rebels broke into a police station in today’s Dahu Township (大湖) in Miaoli and made off with a cache of weapons. The police immediately searched the area and captured eight rebels, who were tortured into leaking information. By October, they had essentially thwarted the entire plan.
Lo fled to Tamsui and was waiting for a chance to sail to China when authorities caught him and found on him a notebook containing a list of comrades, leading to mass arrests.
SHIFT IN LEGACY
As customary for Taiwan’s historical figures, Lo’s legacy has stirred controversy throughout the decades, especially due to his ties to China. Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) officially commended him and he was considered a national hero that all schoolchildren learned about. On the 100th anniversary of his execution, then-president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) paid his respects, noting that “from these events in history, we can see the close ties between Taiwan and the Republic of China.”
Critics, on the other hand, maintain that Lo’s heroic image was built up by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) to further their ideology. This ideological struggle has led to the obscuring of Lo’s full story.
Sung Pei-fen (宋佩芬) and Chang Wei-hsi (張韡曦) look at the shift in Lo’s portrayal in the study The Narrative Changes of Taiwanese History(台灣史的詮釋轉變) by examining several junior high textbooks.
History (歷史), published in 1997, emphasizes Lo’s connections with Sun Yat-sen’s (孫逸仙) revolution and cites his exploits as the prime example for anti-Japanese armed revolts during the early years of colonial rule.
Published the same year, Understanding Taiwan (認識台灣) merely lists Lo among the 20 people who were executed for their role in the Miaoli Incident, but notes that the incident was minzu (民族) in nature. Minzu is a politically-charged phrase that is often used to represent ethnic Chinese worldwide, but can also mean ethnic in general or nationalist. It’s unclear what the author means here, as many educated Taiwanese did see China as the motherland before they became disillusioned by KMT misrule.
The 2008 history textbooks also downplay the China connection, showing Lo simply as a revolutionary in Taiwan. However, regarding Lo’s uprising, a social studies textbook states: “Due to the influence of the revolution in China, there were many anti-Japanese revolts that carried minzu characteristics.” Again, this raises more questions than answers.
With textbooks unreliable, fortunately there are primary sources. It’s clear that Lo fully identified with the Republic of China (ROC) and sought to “recover” Taiwan on behalf of China and liberate his fellow Han Chinese from foreign rule. But in his written confession, he cites the various injustices the Japanese inflicted on the Taiwanese as the main impetus for his actions, which he details at length.
“If we compare Taiwan to the human body, the Japanese are only stripping away at its skin right now. In four or five years, they will surely move on to the flesh and bones, and in eight or 10 years, they will be sucking on the marrow.”
His concerns did come true as Japanization policies began in the 1930s that sought to completely eradicate Taiwanese culture.
No matter his political ideology, Lo seemed to be a fearless man who did care for the people of Taiwan. He left the following words to the Japanese:
“To the governors of Taiwan: I accept my death penalty, there is no need for a trial … There’s no need to panic, just wait and see what [my comrades] will do next year. I guarantee that from this day on, you won’t enjoy one day of peace.”
Taiwan in Time, a column about Taiwan’s history that is published every Sunday, spotlights important or interesting events around the nation that have anniversaries this week.
Jason Han says that the e-arrival card spat between South Korea and Taiwan shows that Seoul is signaling adherence to its “one-China” policy, while Taiwan’s response reflects a reciprocal approach. “Attempts to alter the diplomatic status quo often lead to tit-for-tat responses,” the analyst on international affairs tells the Taipei Times, adding that Taiwan may become more cautious in its dealings with South Korea going forward. Taipei has called on Seoul to correct its electronic entry system, which currently lists Taiwan as “China (Taiwan),” warning that reciprocal measures may follow if the wording is not changed before March 31. As of yesterday,
The Portuguese never established a presence on Taiwan, but they must have traded with the indigenous people because later traders reported that the locals referred to parts of deer using Portuguese words. What goods might the Portuguese have offered their indigenous trade partners? Among them must have been slaves, for the Portuguese dealt slaves across Asia. Though we often speak of “Portuguese” ships, imagining them as picturesque vessels manned by pointy-bearded Iberians, in Asia Portuguese shipping between local destinations was crewed by Asian seamen, with a handful of white or Eurasian officers. “Even the great carracks of 1,000-2,000 tons which plied
It’s only half the size of its more famous counterpart in Taipei, but the Botanical Garden of the National Museum of Nature Science (NMNS, 國立自然科學博物館植物園) is surely one of urban Taiwan’s most inviting green spaces. Covering 4.5 hectares immediately northeast of the government-run museum in Taichung’s North District (北區), the garden features more than 700 plant species, many of which are labeled in Chinese but not in English. Since its establishment in 1999, the site’s managers have done their best to replicate a number of native ecosystems, dividing the site into eight areas. The name of the Coral Atoll Zone might
Nuclear power is getting a second look in Southeast Asia as countries prepare to meet surging energy demand as they vie for artificial intelligence-focused data centers. Several Southeast Asian nations are reviving mothballed nuclear plans and setting ambitious targets and nearly half of the region could, if they pursue those goals, have nuclear energy in the 2030s. Even countries without current plans have signaled their interest. Southeast Asia has never produced a single watt of nuclear energy, despite long-held atomic ambitions. But that may soon change as pressure mounts to reduce emissions that contribute to climate change, while meeting growing power needs. The
RSS