Taiwan in Time: Jan. 18 to Jan. 24
After more than two years in an Allied prisoner of war camp on what is now South Korea’s Jeju Island, Lee Mao-jen (李茂仁) recalls the moment he was set free. His group of 30 fellow Chinese Communist soldiers stepped out of the barbed wire fences and posed for a photo.
“They told us to head right if we wanted to go to Taiwan, and left if we wanted to go elsewhere,” Lee says in an oral history book published by Academia Historica.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
It wasn’t a difficult decision. A former KMT soldier, Lee was captured by the communists at the end of the Chinese Civil War and forced to serve in the enemy’s army. Just a year later, he was ordered to aid the Korean communists in the Korean War, where he became one of about 21,300 Chinese soldiers placed in Allied prisoner of war camps. He thought about what would happen to him if he chose China.
Between Jan. 23 and Jan. 27, 1954, about 14,000 Chinese prisoners, including Lee, landed at Keelung harbor. Jan. 23 has been observed in Taiwan and South Korea as World Freedom Day (世界自由日) ever since.
Much of the peace talks after the ceasefire focused on prisoners of war, as the Allies had captured far more than their enemies. The Americans wanted to give the prisoners a choice where to go for “respecting personal choice, increasing the military force of the Republic of China and preventing these people from becoming victims of the Chinese Communist Party after they return,” writes historian Chou Hsiu-huan (周秀環) in a study. They also believed that this tactic would serve as incentive for future enemies to surrender.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
After two years of negotiation, the US got its way. About 7,000 prisoners decided to return to China, while the rest decided on Taiwan.
Chou writes that about two-thirds of the arrivals were originally KMT soldiers left behind in China, and that conflicts often erupted in the camps between pro-communist and anti-communist soldiers.
The reason so many decided on Taiwan isn’t an easy question to answer and depends on who you talk to. The official KMT version follows the rhetoric in those days of resisting the evil communists and running toward freedom. Some say they were unhappy about their treatment by the Chinese army and believed that Taiwan offered a better life. Some say that many who decided to return to China were either volunteer soldiers who never fought for the KMT, or teenagers who wanted to return to their families.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
Most prisoners had anti-communist tattoos on their body to show their loyalty to their new government, but reports also show that some of them were forcefully tattooed by anti-communist prisoners during their conflicts and had no choice but to choose Taiwan.
Of course, the Chinese side attributed it to the Allies “re-educating” the prisoners with anti-communism propaganda — which is not an empty accusation. Chang Pu-ting (張步庭), a former prisoner, recalls having to attend “political education classes” (政治教育) taught by instructors from Taiwan, along with mandatory Bible studies.
On Aug. 6, 1953, the KMT announced that citizens should refer to these prisoners as “respectable anti-communist martyrs,” “anti-communist warriors” and “our dear compatriots.”
The first term stuck, and later would be applied to Chinese soldiers who defected to Taiwan.
Tung Hsiang-lung (董翔龍), minister of the Veterans Affairs Council and former navy admiral, sums up the significance of these “martyrs” to the government back then in a 60th anniversary commemorative publication.
“They were like a boost to the heart during the country’s unstable early 1950s,” Tung writes. “They gave us confidence, hope and a chance for the international community to re-understand and accept us. Their spirit of choosing democracy over dictatorship and death over freedom is still a guiding force in human society today, and we should not forget about these people.”
Their story was made into a movie in 1961, and the soldiers were widely praised as heroes and examples of righteous citizens. A book of essays by the soldiers was published in 1986, mostly detailing their new lives and their love of freedom.
Most of them continued on as soldiers in Taiwan until they retired.
Taiwan in Time, a column about Taiwan’s history that is published every Sunday, spotlights important or interesting events around the nation that have anniversaries this week.
Recently the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and its Mini-Me partner in the legislature, the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), have been arguing that construction of chip fabs in the US by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) is little more than stripping Taiwan of its assets. For example, KMT Legislative Caucus First Deputy Secretary-General Lin Pei-hsiang (林沛祥) in January said that “This is not ‘reciprocal cooperation’ ... but a substantial hollowing out of our country.” Similarly, former TPP Chair Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) contended it constitutes “selling Taiwan out to the United States.” The two pro-China parties are proposing a bill that
March 9 to March 15 “This land produced no horses,” Qing Dynasty envoy Yu Yung-ho (郁永河) observed when he visited Taiwan in 1697. He didn’t mean that there were no horses at all; it was just difficult to transport them across the sea and raise them in the hot and humid climate. “Although 10,000 soldiers were stationed here, the camps had fewer than 1,000 horses,” Yu added. Starting from the Dutch in the 1600s, each foreign regime brought horses to Taiwan. But they remained rare animals, typically only owned by the government or
It starts out as a heartwarming clip. A young girl, clearly delighted to be in Tokyo, beams as she makes a peace sign to the camera. Seconds later, she is shoved to the ground from behind by a woman wearing a surgical mask. The assailant doesn’t skip a beat, striding out of shot of the clip filmed by the girl’s mother. This was no accidental clash of shoulders in a crowded place, but one of the most visible examples of a spate of butsukari otoko — “bumping man” — shoving incidents in Japan that experts attribute to a combination of gender
Last month, media outlets including the BBC World Service and Bloomberg reported that China’s greenhouse gas emissions are currently flat or falling, and that the economic giant appears to be on course to comfortably meet Beijing’s stated goal that total emissions will peak no later than 2030. China is by far and away the world’s biggest emitter of greenhouse gases, generating more carbon dioxide than the US and the EU combined. As the BBC pointed out in their Feb. 12 report, “what happens in China literally could change the world’s weather.” Any drop in total emissions is good news, of course. By
RSS